Agamben’s political philosophy claims to offer an ontological account of the problem of state violence and the ‘desubjectification’ involved in our idea of citizenship, which manifested itself in the emergency measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Agamben’s theory of the homo sacer traces a constitutive potential, lurking at the heart of all forms of Occidental politics, for suspending the rule of law, exposing the lives of its subjects to a violence that is both legally permissible and free of legal sanction. The article criticizes Agamben’s logic of potentiality, as it appears in several crucial junctures of his theory: his ontologization of historical configurations of political violence; his concept of form of life; and the way his messianic vision is based on a problematic notion of the destituent potential of human life. The article ends by examining a more promising treatment of potentiality, offered by political theories centered around the notion of human dependency, and the potential abuse or exploitation thereof.
AdornoTheodor W.1973. The Jargon of Authenticity. Northwestern University Press.
2.
AgambenGiorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford University Press.
3.
AgambenGiorgio. 1999. Remnants of Auschwitz, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Zone Books.
4.
AgambenGiorgio. 2000. Means Without End: Notes on Politics, trans. Vincenzo Binetti and Cesare Casarino. University of Minnesota Press.
5.
AgambenGiorgio. 2005. The Time that Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans, trans. Patricia Dailey. Stanford University Press.
6.
AgambenGiorgio. 2009. What is an Apparatus and Other Essays, trans. David Kishik and Stefan Pedatella. Stanford University Press.
7.
AgambenGiorgio. 2013. The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life, trans. Adam Kotsko. Stanford University Press.
8.
AgambenGiorgio. 2014. The Use of Bodies, trans. Adam Kotsko. Stanford University Press.
9.
AgambenGiorgio. 2021. Where are We Now? the Epidemic as Politics, trans. Valeria Dani. ERIS.
10.
BalibarÉtienne. 2019. Towards a New Critique of Political Economy: from Generalized Surplus Value to Total Subsumption. In Capitalism: Concept, Idea, Image Aspects of Marx’s Capital, edited by OsbornePeterAlliezÉricRussellEric-John, 36–57. CRMEP Books.
11.
BernsteinJ. M. (2006) Intact and Fragmented Bodies: Versions of Ethics ‘After Auschwitz’. New German Critique97(33:1): 31–52.
12.
BettaMichela. 2016. “Foucault’s Overlooked Organisation: Revisiting His Critical Works.” Culture, Theory and Critique57: 251–73.
13.
BourdieuPierre. 1992. The Logic of Practice. trans. Richard Nice. Stanford University Press.
14.
BrittainChristopher Craig. 2010. “Political Theology at a Standstill: Adorno and Agamben on the Messianic.” Thesis Eleven102 (1): 39–56.
15.
ButlerJudith. 2004. Precarious Life. Verso.
16.
ButlerJudith. 2012. “Can One Lead a Good Life in a Bad Life.” Radical Philosophy176: 9–18.
17.
DeanJodi. 2009. “Politics Without Politics.” Parallax15 (3): 20–36.
18.
DerridaJacques.2009. The Beast and the Sovereign Volume 1, ed. Michel Lisse, Marie-Louise Mallet, and Ginette Michaud, trans. Geoffrey Bennington. The University of Chicago Press.
19.
KalyvasAndreas. 2005. “The Sovereign Weaver: Beyond the Camp.” In Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben's Homo sacer, edited by NorrisAndrew, 107–34. Duke University Press.
20.
KenaanHagiSenderowiczYaron. 2022. “Making Sense with Death: a Response to Heidegger.” Angelaki27 (1): 82–92.
21.
LindholmSamuel. 2024. “Giorgio Agamben’s Critique of the Covid-19 Response Has Little to Do with Biopolitics.” Critical Horizons25 (3): 199–212.
22.
LiskaVivian. 2008. Giorgio Agambens Leerer Messianismus. Schlebrügge.
23.
ListLotte. 2021. “Political Theology and Historical Materialism: Reading Benjamin Against Agamben.” Theory, Culture & Society38 (3): 117–40.
24.
MarmontGiovanniPrimeraGerman E.. 2020. “Propositions for Inoperative Life.” Journal of Italian Philosophy3: 9–21.
25.
MarxKarl. 1991. Capital Volume 3, trans. David Fembach. Penguin.
26.
MarxKarl.1996. ‘Preface’ to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. In Later Political Writings. ed. and trans. Terrell Carver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 158–162.
27.
MauSøren. 2023. Mute Compulsion: A Marxist Theory of the Economic Power of Capital. Verso.
McLuhanMarshall. 1994. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. MIT Press.
30.
MulajJeta. 2024. “Ontology as Ideology: a Critique of Butler's Theory of Precariousness.” Constellations31: 491–505.
31.
OphirAdi. 2006. “The Two-State Solution: Providence and Catastrophe.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law8 (1): 117–60.
32.
PrimeraGerman Eduardo. 2019. The Political Ontology of Giorgio Agamben. Bloomsbury.
33.
ProzorovSergei. 2023. “A Farewell to Homo Sacer? Sovereign Power and Bare Life in Agamben’s Coronavirus Commentary.” Law and Critique34: 63–80.
34.
ShenhavYehouda (2012) Imperialism, Exceptionalism and the Contemporary World. In: SvirskyMarceloBignallSimone (eds). Agamben and Colonialism. Edinburgh University Press, 17–31.
35.
StettlerMatteo J. 2025. “Beyond Agamben’s Bare Life: Understanding Acts of Resistance in the Camp with Levi and the Late Foucault.” Philosophy & Social Criticism. Published online 17 April 2025.
36.
WhyteJessica. 2013. Catastrophe and Redemption: The Political Thought of Giorgio Agamben. State University of New York Press.
37.
ŽižekSlavoj (2007) Multitude, Surplus, and Envy. Rethinking Marxism19(1): 46–58.
