This paper examines Hannah Arendt’s critique of classical social contract theory through her analysis of the twentieth-century crisis of personal judgement. Whereas scholarship often attributes the crisis of judgement to the collapse of traditional standards, this study argues, on the contrary, that the reluctance to exercise judgement stems from tradition’s enduring influence – particularly the epistemological and political legacies of Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. By closely analysing Arendt’s engagements with these thinkers, I demonstrate how the classical contract tradition systematically subordinates or suppresses individual judgement by framing it as unreliable without external criteria, thereby undermining political agency. The paper concludes by emphasizing that recovering judgement as a central faculty of political life requires critically confronting – and overcoming – the conceptual frameworks inherited from social contract theory.
ArendtHannah. 1969. Between past and Future. Viking Press.
2.
ArendtHannah. 1972. Crises of the Republic. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
3.
ArendtHannah. 1976. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Harcourt Brace & Company.
4.
ArendtHannah. 1978. The Life of the Mind. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
5.
ArendtHannah. 1990. On Revolution. Penguin.
6.
ArendtHannah. 1992. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
7.
ArendtHannah. 1998. The Human Condition. 2nd ed.University of Chicago Press.
8.
ArendtHannah. 2003. Responsibility and Judgment. Schocken.
9.
ArendtHannah. 2005. The Promise of Politics. Schocken.
10.
ArendtHannah. 2006. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Penguin.
11.
BeinerRonald. 2010. Political Judgment. Routledge.
12.
BenhabibSeyla. 2003. The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Rowman and Littlefield.
13.
BerkowitzPeter. 2010. “Why We Must Judge.” Democracy18: 56–69.
14.
BernsteinJ. M.2010. “Promising and Civil Disobedience.” In Thinking in Dark Times, edited by BerkowitzRogerKatzJeffreyKeenanThomas, 115–27. Fordham University Press.
15.
BirminghamPeg. 2011. “Arendt and Hobbes: Glory, Sacrificial Violence, and the Political Imagination.” Research in Phenomenology41, no. 1: 1–22.
16.
BirminghamPeg. 2021. “Thomas Hobbes: the Emancipation of the Political-Economic.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Arendt, edited by GrattonPeterSariYasemin, 34–43. Bloomsbury.
17.
Blumenthal-BarbyMartin. 2023. Arendt, Kant, and the Enigma of Judgment. Evanston. Northwestern University Press.
18.
CanovanMargaret. 1983. “Arendt, Rousseau, and Human Plurality in Politics.” The Journal of Politics45, no. 2: 286–302.
19.
DeutscherMax. 2006. Judgment After Arendt. Ashgate.
20.
FlikschuhKatrin. 2008. “Reason, Right, and Revolution: Kant and Locke.” Philosophy and Public Affairs36 (4): 375–404.
21.
GadamerHans-Georg. 2013. Truth and Method. Bloomsbury.
22.
GarstenBryan (2009) Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Harvard University Press.
23.
HabermasJürgen. 1977. “Hannah Arendt’s Communications Concept of Power.” Social Research44, no. 1: 3–24.
24.
HobbesThomas. Leviathan. Hackett, 1994. Originally published 1651.
25.
HonigBonnie. 2023. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Cornell University Press.
26.
HonnethAxel. 2021. Recognition: A Chapter in the History of European Ideas. Cambridge University Press.
27.
IngramDavid. 1988. “The Postmodern Kantianism of Arendt and Lyotard.” The Review of Metaphysics42, no. 1: 51–77.
28.
KatebGeorge. 1983. “Arendt and Representative Democracy.” Salmagundi60: 20–59.
29.
KoselleckReinhart. 1988. Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. MIT Press.
30.
LockeJohn. 1996. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press. Originally published 1690.
31.
LockeJohn. 2003. A Letter Concerning Toleration. Hackett. Originally published 1689.
32.
Maira SotomayorM.2025. Enacting Selves: Responsibility and Judgment in Arendt and Cavell. PhD Thesis. Boston College.
33.
MartelJames. 2010. “Can There Be Politics Without Sovereignty? Arendt, Derrida, and the Question of Sovereign Inevitability.” Law, Culture and the Humanities6, no. 2: 153–66.
34.
MuhlmannGeraldine. 2007. “Hannah Arendt and the Liberal Tradition.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal28, no. 2: 117–38.
35.
NorrisAndrew. 2017. “Skepticism and Critique in Arendt and Cavell.” Philosophy and Social Criticism44, no. 1: 81–99.
36.
PetherbridgeDanielle. 2016. “Between Thinking and Action: Arendt on Conscience and Civil Disobedience.” Philosophy and Social Criticism42, no. 10: 971–81.
37.
PitkinHanna. 1981. “Justice: on Relating Private and Public.” Political Theory9, no. 3: 327–52.
38.
Popp-MadsenBenjamin Ask. 2021. Visions of Council Democracy. Edinburgh University Press.
39.
RodowickD. N.2024. “Ethics and Politics: on Some Common Themes in Hannah Arendt and Stanley Cavell.” Arendt Studies8, no. 1: 23–34.
40.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 2002a. “Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Mankind.” In The Social Contract and the First and Second Discourses, edited by DunnSusan, 69–148. Yale University Press. Originally published 1755.
41.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 2002b. “The Social Contract.” In The Social Contract and the First and Second Discourses, edited by DunnSusan, 149–254. Yale University Press. Originally published 1762.
42.
SchwartzJonathan Peter. 2016. Arendt’s Judgment: Freedom, Responsibility, Citizenship. University of Pennsylvania Press.
43.
SmithBrian. 2015. “‘On Revolution’: Arendt, Locke, and Republican Revisionism.” History of Political Thought36, no. 3: 560–79.
44.
SoniVivasvan. 2010. “Introduction: the Crisis of Judgment.” The Eighteenth Century51, no. 3: 261–88.
45.
StraehleEdgar. 2019. “The Problem of Sovereignty: Reading Hobbes Through the Eyes of Hannah Arendt.” Hobbes Studies32, no. 1: 71–91.
46.
StraussLeo. 1953. Natural Right and History. University of Chicago Press.
47.
VetlesenArne Johan. 1992. Perception, Empathy, and Judgment: An Inquiry into the Preconditions of Moral Performance. Pennsylvania State University Press.
48.
VillaDana. 2021. Arendt. Routledge.
49.
ZerilliLinda M. G.2016. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. University of Chicago Press.
