I will critically explore Arato and Cohen’s work on populism acknowledging areas of agreement while noting gaps in their reasoning particularly regarding the complex relations between capitalism and democracy and the recent erosion of democracy replacing it with authoritarian regimes that are better suited for neoliberal policies.
AratoA.CohenJ. L.2022. Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
ArendtH.1963. On Revolution. New York: Penguin.
3.
ChambersSimoneKopsteinJeffrey. 2022. “Wrecking the Public Sphere: The New Authoritarian Attack on Pluralism and Truth.” Constellations30 (3): 225–240.
4.
Di TellaT. S.1965. “Populism and Reform in Latin America.” In Obstacles to Change in Latin America, edited by VélizC., 47–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
FedericiS.2020. Reencantar el mundo: El Feminismo y la Política de los Comunes. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.
6.
GermaniG.1962. Política y sociedad en una época de transición: De la sociedad tradicional a la sociedad de masas. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
7.
GermaniG.1978. Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
8.
HabermasJ.1996. “Popular Sovereignty as Procedure.” In Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, edited by HabermasJ., 463–40; W. Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
9.
HardtM.NegriA.2005. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.
10.
LaclauE.2005. On Populist Reason. New York and London: Verso.
11.
LefortC.2006. “The Permanence of the Theologico-Political?” In Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World, edited by de VriesH.SullivanL. E., 148–17. New York: Fordham University Press.
12.
RonsavallonP.2008. Counter-Democracy: Politics in the Age of Distrust (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
