In this article, I combine political philosophy and film to examine the problematic of the ‘mystical’ foundation of authority and democracy as represented in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance. Ford’s filmic vision is interpretable as a parable of the passage from the state of nature to the modern republic and the deconstruction of American democratic progressivism. To analyse it, I proceed in two steps: first, I defend a middle-way critical Enlightenment perspective between the democratic-progressivist and the deconstructive approach to the question of foundations. Second, in dialogue with this critical Enlightenment perspective, I argue that Ford’s cinematic vision of the foundation remains ambivalent, given that its deconstruction of the mythology of American democratic progressivism is premised on the nostalgic mythologizing of the pre-democratic age. Moreover, I take issue with Robert Pippin’s interpretation of the movie as a cautionary tale against Enlightenment rationalism, and which poses at its center the key psychological role of myths in politics (2011). In contrast, I argue that Ford’s cinematic vision cautions against decoupling the socio-political and personal life from the vital connection to truth and acting upon truth. From this standpoint, a “politics of truth” is, against Pippin’s interpretation of Ford’s vision, compatible with taking into account the constitutive role of narratives in building political legitimacy and authority.
ArendtHannah. 1965. On Revolution. New York: Viking Press.
2.
ArendtHannah. 1968. Between Past and Future. New York: Viking Press.
3.
BazinAndré. 1971. What Is Cinema, Vol. 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
BogdanovichPeter. 1967. John Ford. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
BöhnkeMichael. 2001. “Myth and Law in the Films of John Ford.” Journal of Law and Society 28, no. 1: 47–63.
6.
BordwellDavidJanetStaigerKristinThompson. 1988. The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960. London: Routledge.
7.
BotticiChiara. 2007. A Philosophy of Political Myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BradatanCosticaCamilUngureanu. 2014 (eds). Religion in the Contemporary European Cinema: the Postecular Constellation. New York: Routledge.
9.
BradatanCosticaCamilUngureanu. 2016 (eds). Cinema and Sacrifice. New York: Routledge.
10.
BrunkhorstHauke.2006. “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance— Von der rachenden zur revolutionären Gewalt.” Paragrana: Internationale Zeitschrift für Historische Anthropologie15, no. 1: 159–67.
11.
CrithleySimon. 2014. The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas, 3rd revised ed.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
12.
CapdevillaPol. 2023. Desafíos del tiempo. Estética del tiempo histórico en el arte contemporáneo, Barcelona, Gedisa(forthcoming).
13.
CookeMaeve. 1997. Language and Reason: A Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
DerridaJacques. 1986. “Declarations of Independence.” New Political Science7, no. 1: 7–15.
15.
DerridaJacques. 1992. “Force of Law.” In Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, edited by CornellDrucillaRosenfeldMichaelCarlsonDavid Gray, 3–67. New York: Routledge.
16.
DerridaJacques. 2005. Rogues. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
17.
EaglemanBrian. 2017. The Brain. The Story of you. New York: Vintage.
18.
FerraraAlessandro. 2001. “Of Boats and Principles, Reflections on Habermas’ ‘Constitutional Democracy’.” Political Theory26, no. 6: 33–56.
19.
FloodChristopher G. 2013. Political Myth. London and New York: Routledge.
20.
GallagherTom. 1988. John Ford: The Man and His Films. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
HabermasJürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Massachussets: MIT Press.
22.
HabermasJ.2001. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” Political Theory29, no. 6: 3–20.
23.
HabermasJürgen. 2003. Truth and Justification. Cambridge: Polity.
24.
HermanEdward S.ChomskyNoam. 1988. Manufacturing Consent. New York: Pantheon Books.
25.
HonigBonie. 1991. “Declarations of Independence: Arendt and Derrida on the Problem of Founding a Republic.” The American Political Science Review85, no. 1: 97–113.
26.
HonigBonie. 2001. “Dead Rights, Live Futures. A Reply to Habermas’ ‘Constitutional Democracy’.” Political Theory26, no. 6: 31–50.
27.
HustvedtSiri. 2012. Living, Thinking, Looking: Essays. New York: Picador Paper.
28.
KeaneJohn. 2000. Václav Havel: A Political Tragedy in Six Acts. New York: Basic Books.
29.
KrausPeter. 2021. “Popular Republicanism versus Populism: Articulating the People.” Social Sciences10, no. 366: 1–16.
30.
LakoffGeorge. 2016. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. 3rd ed.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
31.
LeutratJean-Louis. 1997. L’Homme qui tua Liberty Valance: John Ford, Étude critique. Paris: Édition Nathan.
32.
LlevadotLaura. 2020. Jacques Derrida: Democracia y soberanía. Barcelona: Gedisa.
McBrideJoseph. 2011. Searching for John Ford. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
35.
MichelmanFrank. 1997. “How Can Ever People Make the Laws? A Critique of Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Democracy, edited by JamesBohmanRehgWilliam, 34–50. Cambridge: MIT Press.
36.
MichelmanFrank. 2001. “Constitutional Legitimation for Political Acts.” Modern Law Review66, no. 1: 1–15.
37.
MihaiMihaela. 2022. Political Memory and the Aesthetics of Care: The Art of Complicity and Resistance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
38.
MulhallStephen. 2016. On Film. 3rd ed.Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
39.
NussbaumMartha. 1992. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Ochoa EspechoPaulina. 2011. The Time of Popular Sovereignty. Process and the Democratic State. University Park, PA, USA: The Pennsylvania University Press.
41.
Pía LaraMaria. 2020. Beyond the Public Sphere: Film and the Feminist Imaginary. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
42.
PippinRobert B. 2011. Hollywood Westerns and American Myth: The Importance of Howard Hawks and John Ford for Political Philosophy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
PippinRobert B. 2020. Filmed Thought Cinema as Reflective Form. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
44.
RancièreJacques. 2009. The Future of the Image. London: Verso Books.
45.
RawlsJohn.1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
46.
Rosàs TosasMar. 2016. Mesianismo en la filosofía contemporánea. Barcelona: Herder.
47.
RenanErnest. 2015. What Is a Nation? And Other Political Writings. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
48.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 2018.‘The Social Contract’ and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
RuizCollantesXavierF. 2019. La construcción del relato político. Crear historias para ganar votos. Barcelona: The Publishing House of the Autonomous University of Barcelona (in Spanish).
50.
SarrisAndrew. 1962. “Cactus Rosebud, or The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.” Film Culture5, no. 1: 23–40.
51.
SarrisAndrew. 1975. The John Ford Movie Mystery. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
52.
SchmittCarl. 2006. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: Cicago University Press.
53.
ScrutonRoger. 2002. The Meaning of Conservatism. Chicago, USA: St. Augustines Press.
54.
SegalRobert. 2015. Myth: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
SenAmartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, Massachussetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
56.
Serrano ZamoraJ.2021. Democratization and Struggles Against Injustice. A Pragmatist Approach to the Epistemic Practices of Social Movements. London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield International.
57.
ShillerRobert J.2019. Narrative Economics: How Stories Go Viral and Drive Major Economic Events. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
58.
SirczukMatías. 2018. Fundación y Legitimidad en la Modernidad Política: Carl Schmitt, Hannah Arendt y Claude Lefort. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
StudlarGaylynMatthewBernstein (eds). 2001. John Ford Made Westerns. Filming the Legend in the Sound Era. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
61.
TaylorCharles. 1989. Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
62.
UngureanuCamil. 2008. “Derrida on Decision: Between Habermas’ Discursivism and Schmitt’s Decisionism.” Journal of Political Philosophy16, no. 3: 293–25.
63.
UngureanuCamil. 2013. “Derrida’s Tense Bow.” The European Legacy18, no. 6: 727–39.
64.
UngureanuCamilIvanSerrano. 2018. “Populismo como Relato y la Crisis de la Democracia Representativa.” The CIDOB Journal of International Affairs119: 13–33.
65.
UngureanuCamil. 2019a. “Jacques Derrida on Religion and Universalizing Faith.” Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies18, no. 54: 18–32.
66.
UngureanuCamil. 2019b. “Philosophy of History.” In The Cambridge Habermas-Lexicon, edited by AllenAmyMendietaEduardo, 296–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
UngureanuCamil. 2020. Cine y Política: Una Inmersión Rápida. Barcelona: Tibidabo Editions (in Spanish).
68.
UngureanuCamilAlexandraPopartan. 2020. “Populism as Narrative, Myth-Making, and the “Logic” of Political Emotions.” Journal of the British Academy8, no. (s1): 37–43. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/008s1.037
69.
UngureanuCamilMontiPaolo. 2018. Contemporary Political Philosophy and Religion. London: Routledge.
70.
WellmerAlbrecht. 1998. “The Debate About Truth: Pragmatism Without Regulative Ideas.” Critical Horizons4, no. 1: 29–56.
71.
WittgensteinLudwig. 1974. Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
