The present inquiry concerns ‘affective governmentality’ and is guided by the following question: How did affects become intelligible objects of knowledge and what enabled a scientific conception of affect to turn into a distinctive government of affect? In answering this question, the article first outlines how a lineage of thinkers used the speculative tools of geometry to conceptualize and deduce human affects. Through an analysis of Spinoza’s Political Treatise, the article then investigates how this geometric conception of affect enabled a productive and indirect government of affect. The article’s contribution to the study of affective governmentality is twofold: First, it advances the methodological claim that the proper register to study affects in governmentality is anatomo-political rather than biopolitical. Second, the analysis of the Political Treatise exemplifies, nuances and substantiates our understanding of how desires and affects were reconceptualized geometrically to conceive a government of bodies and souls.
AgambenGiorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press.
2.
AndersonBen. 2012. “Affect and Biopower: Towards a Politics of Life.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers37 (1): 28‐43.
3.
AubreyJohn. 2020. ‘Brief Lives’, Chiefly of Contemporaries, Set down by John Aubrey, between the Years 1669 and 1695, edited by ClarkAndrew. Oxford: Cosimo Classics.
4.
HobbesThomas. 1996. Leviathan or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiaticall and Civil. Edited by RichardTuck. Cambridge University Press.
5.
GueroultMartial. 1984. Descartes’ Philosophy Interpreted According to the Order of Reasons. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
BalibarÉtienne. 1998a. Spinoza and Politics. New York: Verso.
7.
de BeisteguiMiguel. 2021. “The Politics of Indignation: A Spinozist Perspective.” Crisis & Critique8 (1); 12‐50.
8.
DeleuzeGilles. 1988a. Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
DeleuzeGilles. 1988b. Spinoza, Practical Philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights.
10.
DeleuzeGilles. 1990. Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza. New York: Zone Books.
11.
DescartesRené. 2003. Meditations and Other Metaphysical Writings. 3rd ed. Penguin.
12.
FoucaultMichel. 1978. The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.
13.
FoucaultMichel. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975‐75. New York: Picador
14.
FoucaultMichel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. Springer.
15.
FoucaultMichel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collége de France, 1978‐1979. New York: Picador.
16.
HobbesThomas. 1998. On the Citizen. Cambridge University Press.
17.
JamesSusan. 2018. “Politically Mediated Affects: Envy in Spinoza’s Tractatus Politicus.” in Spinoza’s Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, 61-77. Edited by, MelamedYitzhakSharpHasana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
JaquetChantal. 2018b. “Longing (Desiderium) for Vengeance as the Foundation of the Commonwealth.”, in Spinoza’s Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, 78-92. Edited by, MelamedYitzhakSharpHasana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
MatheronAlexandre. 2020a. “Passions and Institutions According to Spinoza.”, in Politics, Ontology and Knowledge in Spinoza, 136-162. Edited by, Filippo Del Lucchese, David Maruzzella, Gil Morejon. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
20.
MatheronAlexandre. 2020b. “Spinoza and the Breakdown of Thomist Politics: Machiavelli and Utopia.” In Politics, Ontology and Knowledge in Spinoza, 319-52. Edited by, Filippo Del Lucchese, David Maruzzella, Gil Morejon. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
21.
McCormickTed. 2022a. Human Empire: Mobility and Demographic Thought in the British Atlantic World, 1500–1800. Cambridge University Press.
22.
MontagWarren. 1999. Bodies, Masses, Power: Spinoza and His Contemporaries. Verso.
23.
MoreauPierre-François. 2011. “Imitation Of The Affects And Interhuman Relations.” Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary, 187-178. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History 196. Leiden: Brill.
24.
MoreauPierre-François. 2022. Experience and Eternity in Spinoza. Translated by Robert Boncardo. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
25.
MühlhoffRainer. 2020. “Affective Disposition, or: Reading Spinoza With Foucault. Towards an Affect Theory of Subjectivation and Power.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3729364.
26.
PettyWilliam. 1928. The Petty-Southwell Correspondence 1676-1687. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
SpinozaBenedictus de. 1987. Spinoza Opera: Im Augtrag Der Heidelberger Akademie Der Wissenschaften Herausgegeben von Carl Gebhardt edited by GebhardtCarl. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitætsbuchhandlung.
28.
SpinozaBenedictus de. 2016. The Collected Works of Spinoza. Translated by E. M. Curley. Vol. II. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
29.
BalibarÉtienne. 1989. “Spinoza, the Anti-Orwell: The Fear of the Masses,” in Rethinking Marxism2 (3): 104-139.
30.
de BeisteguiMiguel. 2018. The Government of Desire: A genealogy of the liberal subjectChicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, ISBN 9780226547374
31.
BillecoqAlain. 2009. Spinoza: Questions Politiques: Quatre Études Sur l’actualité Du Traité Politique. Editions L’Harmattan.
32.
BotticiChiarade BeisteguiMiguel. 2018. “Spinoza and the Hydraulic Discipline of Affects: From the Theologico-Political to the Economic Regime of Desire.” In Spinoza’s Authority Volume II: Resistance and Power in the Political Treatises, edited by Kiarina KordelaA.VardoulakisDimitris, 167-192. London: Bloomsbury.
33.
CarneraAlexander. 2012. “The Affective Turn: The Ambivalence of Biopolitics within Modern Labour and Management.” Culture and Organization18 (1): 69-84.
34.
CasarinoCesare. 2017. “Grammars of Conatus; or, On the Primacy of Resistance in Spinoza, Foucault, and Deleuze.” In Spinoza’s Authority Volume II: Resistance and Power in Ethics, Edited by KiarinaKordela A.DimitrisVardoulakis, 57-85. London: Bloomsbury.
35.
DeanMitchell. 1999. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. Sage publications.
36.
Del LuccheseFilippo. 2009. Conflict, Power, and Multitude in Machiavelli and Spinoza: Tumult and Indignation. Bloomsbury Publishing.
37.
DescartesRené. 1954. The Geometry. Dover Publications.
38.
DiderotDennis. 2008. “Political Arithmetic.” The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d’Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. translated by Matthew A’Auria, 1, 678–80. Michigan Publishing. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0000.597.
39.
EspositoRoberto. 2008. Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy. University of Minnesota Press.
40.
FoucaultMichel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. 2nd ed. Vintage Books.
41.
GatensMoiraSteinbergJustinArmstrongAureliaJamesSusanSaarMartin. 2021. “Spinoza: Thoughts on Hope in Our Political Present.” Contemporary Political Theory20: 200-231.
42.
GrattonPeter. 2013. “Spinoza and the Biopolitical Roots of Modernity.” Angelaki18 (3): 91‐102.
43.
GueroultMartial. 1973. “Spinoza’s Letter on the Infinite.” In Spinoza. A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by GreneMarjorie, 182-212. New York: Anchor/Doubleday.
44.
HirschmanAlbert O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Twentieth Anniversary Edition. Princeton University Press.
45.
HobbesThomas. 1966. Elements of Philosophy: The First Section, Concerning Body, edited by William Molesworth. 2nd ed.The English Works of Thomas Hobbes. Darmstadt: Scientia Verlag Aalen.
46.
JamesSusan. 1997. Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
47.
JaquetChantal. 2018a. Affects, Actions and Passions in Spinoza: The Unity of Body and Mind. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
48.
JessephDouglasM. 1999. Squaring the Circle: The War Between Hobbes and Wallis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
JuniperJamesJoseJim. 2008. “Foucault and Spinoza: philosophies of immanence and the decentred political subject.” Foucault and Spinoza: Philosophies of Immanence and the Decentred Political Subject History of the Human Sciences21, 2: 1‐20.
50.
KantolaAnuSeeckHanneleMannevuoMona. 2019. “Affect in Governmentality: Top Executives Managing the Affective Milieu of Market Liberalisation.” Organization26, 6: 761‐82.
51.
KordelaKiarina. 2017. ‘Spinoza’s Biopolitics: Commodification of Substance and Secular Immortality’. In Spinoza’s Authority: Resistance and Power in Ethics, I:197–217. 2017.
52.
KoyréAlexandre. 1968. “Galileo and the Scientific Revolution.” In Metaphysics and Measurement: Essays in Scientific Revolution, Vol. 1–16. London: Chapman & Hall.
53.
LachtermanDavid Rapport. 1989. The Ethics of Geometry: A Genealogy of Modernity. Routledge.
54.
LemkeThomas. 2019. A Critique of Political Reason: Foucault’s Analysis of Modern Governmentality. Verso.
55.
MachereyPierre. 2011. Hegel or Spinoza. Translated by Susan Ruddick. University of Minnesota Press.
56.
MatheronAlexandre. 1969. Individu et Communauté Chez Spinoza. Editions de Minuit.
57.
McCormickTed. 2009. William Petty and the Ambitions of Political Arithmetic. Oxford University Press.
58.
MontagWarren. 1995. “The Soul Is the Prison of the Body”: Althusser and Foucault, 1970-1975.” Yale French Studies88: 53‐77.
59.
MoreauPierre-François. 2006. Les Passions à l’âge Classique: Théories et Critiques Des Passiones. Léviathan. PUF.
60.
MühlhoffRainer. 2018. Immersive Macht: Affekttheorie Nach Spinoza Und Foucault. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
61.
NegriAntonioHardtMichael. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
PenzOttoSauerBirgit, eds. 2019. Governing Affects: Neoliberalism, Neo-Bureaucracies, and Service WorkRoutledge.
