The plural, impure or discordant nature of time has become an important theme in recent critical social and political theory. Against Althusser’s dismissal of Sartre’s presumedly Hegelian understanding of time and history, this article establishes Jean-Paul Sartre as a key figure in this debate on the plurality of temporalities. Especially in the Critique of Dialectical Reason, Sartre understands history and the social in terms of a multiplicity of uneven and non-synchronous temporalisations, rejecting an notion of time as a universal container within which events take place. The originality of Sartre’s approach is that it establishes a link between the notion of the plurality of temporalities and the problem of freedom and domination. His mature social and political theory allows us to understand temporalisation as a strategy for domination, and objective social temporality (e.g. the time of the economy or of machine systems) as key to a form of anonymous or structural domination. A reconstruction of this highly complex and sophisticated approach to thinking domination through time can also shed an original light on the temporal dimension of democracy and totalitarianism.
AlthusserLouis. 1973. Réponse à John Lewis. Paris: Maspero.
2.
AlthusserLouis. 2005. For Marx. London: Verso.
3.
AlthusserLouisBalibarEtienne. 1970. Reading Capital. London: New Left Books.
4.
BenjaminWalter. 2007. “Theses on the Philosophy of History.” In Illuminations, edited by ArendtHannah, 253–64. New York: Schocken Books.
5.
BensaïdDaniel. 1995. La Discordance des Temps. Essais sur les Crises, les Classes, l’Histoire. Paris: Les Editions de la Passion.
6.
BensaïdDaniel. 1996. Marx l’Intempestif: Grandeurs et Misères d’une Aventure Critique (XIXe-XXe siècles). Paris: Fayard.
7.
BensaïdDaniel. 1997a. Le pari mélancolique. Métamorphoses de la politique, politiques des métamorphoses. Paris: Fayard.
8.
BensaïdDaniel. 1997b. Qui est le Juge? Pour en Finir avec le Tribunal de l’Histoire. Paris: Fayard.
9.
BensaïdDaniel. 2008. Eloge de la Politique Profane. Paris: Albin Michel.
10.
BlochErnst. 1991. Heritage of Our Times. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
CallinicosAlex. 2004. Making History. Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory. Leiden: Brill.
12.
ChamberSamuel A.2014. Bearing Society in Mind. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
13.
De BeauvoirSimone. 1994. The Ethics of Ambiguity. New York: Citadel Press.
14.
DerridaJacques. 1993. Spectres de Marx. L’Etat de la dette, le travail du deuil et la nouvelle Internationale. Paris: Galilée.
15.
FlynnThomas R.1992. “Sartre and the poetics of history.” In The Cambridge Companion to Sartre, edited by HowellsChristina, 213–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FlynnThomas R.1997. Sartre, Foucault and Historical Reason 1: Towards an Existentialist Theory of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
GiddensAnthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Houndmills: Macmillan.
18.
GikandiSimon. 2004. “Poststructuralism and Postcolonial Discourse.” In The Cambridge Companion to Postcolonial Literary Studies, edited by LazarusNeil, 97–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
KoselleckReinhart. 2000. Zeitschichten. Studien zur Historik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Lévi-StraussClaude. 1966. The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
22.
LievensMatthias. 2017. “Carl Schmitt’s Concept of History.” In The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, edited by MeierhenrichJensSimonsOliver, 401–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
LievensMatthias2019. “L’hypothèse machiavélienne de Sartre. Le conflit comme garant de la liberté.” Études Sartriennes23: 85–108.
24.
LöwyMichael. 2010. The Politics of Combined and Uneven Development. The Theory of Permanent Revolution. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
25.
LukácsGeorg. 1970. Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein. Studien über marxistische Dialektik. Neuwied/Rhein: Luchterhand.
26.
MarcucciNicola. 2017. “Modern Times: Sociological Temporality Between Multiple Modernities and Postcolonial Critique.” In The Government of Time. Theories of Plural Temporality in the Marxist Tradition, edited by MorfinoVittorioThomasPeter D., 265–80. London: Brill.
27.
MorfinoVittorio. 2014. Plural Temporality. Transindividuality and the Aleatory Between Spinoza and Althusser. Leiden: Brill.
28.
MorfinoVittorioThomasPeter D., eds. 2017. The Government of Time. Theories of Plural Temporality in the Marxist Tradition. Leiden: Brill.
29.
OlsonNiklas. 2012. History in the Plural: An Introduction to the Work of Reinhart Koselleck. New York: Berghahn.
30.
PaciEnzo. 1972. The Function of the Sciences and the Meaning of Man. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
31.
SartreJean-Paul. 1968a. The Communists and Peace. With a Reply to Claude Lefort. New York: George Braziller.
32.
SartreJean-Paul. 1968b. Search for a Method. New York: Vintage Books.
33.
SartreJean-Paul. 1972. “Je – Tu – Il.” In Situations 9, 277–315. Paris: Gallimard.
34.
SartreJean-Paul. 1985a. Critique de la raison dialectique. Tôme 1: Théorie des ensembles pratiques. Paris: Gallimard.
35.
SartreJean-Paul. 1985b. Critique de la raison dialectique. Tôme II: L’intelligibilité de l’histoire. Paris: Gallimard.
36.
SartreJean-Paul. 1992. Notebook for an Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
SartreJean-Paul. 1993a. Being and Nothingness. An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. New York: Washington Square Press.
38.
SartreJean-Paul. 1993b. The Family Idiot. Gustave Flaubert 1821-1857. Volume 5. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
SartreJean-Paul. 2003. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. London: Routledge.
40.
SartreJean-Paul. 2004. Critique of Dialectical Reason. Volume 1: Theory of Practical Ensembles. London: Verso.
41.
SartreJean-Paul. 2006. Critique of Dialectial Reason. Volume II (Unfinished). London: Verso.
42.
SartreJean-Paul. 2015. “Les racines de l’éthique.” Etudes Sartriennes19: 1–216.
43.
SchmittCarl. 2007. “The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations.” In The Concept of the Political, 80–96. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
ThomasPeter D.2017. “The Plural Temporalities of Hegemony.” Rethinking Marxism29, no. 2: 281–302.
TombazosStavros. 2014. Time in Marx: The Categories of Time in Marx’s Capital. Leiden: Brill.
47.
ToscanoAlberto. 2017. “Notes on Late Fascism.” Historical Materialism blog. 2 April 2017.
48.
VerstraetenPierre. 1991. ““I Am No Longer a Realist”: An Interview with Jean-Paul Sartre.” In Sartre Alive, edited by AronsonRonaldden HovenAdrian Van, 83–99. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
49.
YoungIris Marion. 1999. “Gender as Seriality. Thinking About Women as a Social Collective.” In Feminist Interpretations of Jean-Paul Sartre, edited by MurphyJulien S., 200–27. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
50.
YoungRobert J.C.2008. White Mythologies. Abingdon: Routledge.
