The article will argue that neither what may be called ‘multiple legitimacies’ nor what Leigh Jenco refers to as the hybrid view of legitimacy provides substantial guidance in reconceiving legitimacy in the increasingly pluralistic region of East Asia. Instead, a more helpful view of political legitimacy can be drawn from John Rawls’s liberal principle of legitimacy. I will demonstrate that Rawls’s classic formulation can be deprived of its liberal connotation by taking constitutional essentials as the source of legitimation for political authority. On the basis of this principle of pluralistic legitimacy, it will become clear that a pluralistic understanding of political legitimacy does not rule out Confucian meritocracy, but it does make a strong case for an antiperfectionist state, even if it might be nondemocratic.
BaiTongdong. 2009. The New Mission of an Old State: The Contemporary and Comparative Relevance of Classical Confucian Political Philosophy. Beijing: Peking University Press.
3.
BaiTongdong. 2012. “A Confucian Improvement to Democracy.” New Perspectives Quarterly29, no. 1: 12–39.
4.
BaiTongdong. 2013. “A Confucian Version of Hybrid Regime: How Does It Work, and Why Is It Superior?” In The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, edited by BellDaniel A.LiChenyang, 55–87. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BellDaniel. 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6.
BellDaniel. 2015. The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
7.
CaneySimon. 1998. “Liberal Legitimacy, Reasonable Disagreement and Justice.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy1, no. 3: 19–36.
8.
ChanJoseph. 2013. “Political Meritocracy and Meritocratic Rule: A Confucian Perspective.” In The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, edited by BellDaniel A.LiChenyang, 31–54. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ChanJoseph. 2014. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10.
Confucius. 2003. Analects with Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Translated by SlingerlandEdward. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
11.
EstlundDavid. January1998. “The Insularity of the Reasonable: Why Political Liberalism Must Admit the Truth.” Ethics108, no. 2: 252–75.
12.
FanRuiping. 2013. “Confucian Meritocracy for Contemporary China.” In The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, edited by BellDaniel A.LiChenyang, 88–115. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FerraraAlessandro. 2014. The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
FerraraAlessandro. 2020. “Authority, Legitimacy and Democracy: Narrowing the Gap Between Normativism and Realism.“Constellations: 1–15.
15.
JencoLeigh. 2016. “Legitimacy as a Hybrid Phenomenon.” In East Asian Perspectives on Political Legitimacy, edited by ChanJosephShinDoh ChullWilliamsMelissa, 238–56. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
JiangQing. 2013. A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future, Edited by BellDanielFanRuiping, Translated by RydenEdmund. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
17.
KimSungmoon. 2015. “Public Reason Confucianism: A Construction.” American Political Science Review109, no. 1: 187–200.
18.
KimSungmoon. 2016. Public Reason Confucianism: Democratic Perfectionism and Constitutionalism in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
KimSungmoon. 2017. “Pragmatic Confucian Democracy: Rethinking the Value of Democracy in East Asia.” The Journal of Politics79, no. 1: 237–49.
20.
LiZhuoyao. 2019. “Political Confucianism and Multivariate Democracy in East Asia.” The Review of Politics81, no. 3: 459–83.
21.
LiZhuoyao. 2020. Political Liberalism, Confucianism, and the Future of Democracy in East Asia. Switzerland: Springer.
22.
MangFranz. 2018. “Confucianism, Perfectionism, and Liberal Society.” Dao17: 29–49.
23.
Mencius. 2008. Mengzi with Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Translated by Van NordenBryan W.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
24.
MichelmanFrank. 2010. “Legitimation by Constitution (and the News from South Africa).” Valparaiso University Law Review44, no. 4: 1015–34.
NussbaumMartha. 2011. “Perfectionist Liberalism and Political Liberalism.” Philosophy & Public Affairs39, no. 1: 3–45.
27.
PinesYuri. 2013. “Between Merit and Pedigree: Evolution of the Concept of ‘Elevating the Worthy’ in Pre-imperial China.” In The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, edited by BellDaniel A.LiChenyang, 161–202. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
QuongJonathan. 2011. Liberalism Without Perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
RawlsJohn. 2005. Political Liberalism, expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
ShinDoh Chull. 2012. Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
WallSteven. 2014. “Perfectionism, Reasonableness, and Respect.” Political Theory42, no. 4: 468–89.
32.
WeberMax. 1964. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Edited by ParsonsTalcott. New York: Free Press.
