The article criticizes the idea that we can find the ‘real meaning’ of populism and focuses instead on six psychological attitudes and political programmes that the term ‘populism’ can invoke: Lake Wobegon populism, short-termism, Trumpism, the attraction of simple solutions, responses to inequality, and direct democracy. While conceptually distinct, these are often found together and can reinforce each other.
D’AngeloJamesRannaliBrent. 2019. “How Transparency Helps Lobbyists and Hurts the Public.” Foreign Affairs, May/June.
4.
ElsterJon2013. Securities Against Misrule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
FernandezRaquelRodrikDani. 1991. “Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty.” American Economic Review81, no. 5: 1146–155.
6.
KempSimon.2007. “Psychology and the Opposition to Free Trade.” World Trade Review6, no. 1: 25–44.
7.
KingAnthonyCreweIvor. 2014. The Blunders of Our Government. London: Oneworld Publications.
8.
RodrikDani2018. “Populism and the Economics of Globalization.” Journal of International Business Policy1, no. 2: 12–33.
9.
StarrJohn Bryan1972. “Revolution in Retrospect: The Paris Commune Through Chinese Eyes.” China Quarterly49: 106–25.
