Abstract
In this article, I identify – and clear up – two problems for contemporary neo-Aristotelian ethical naturalism. The first I call the problem of alienation; the second the problem of conservatism. I argue that these problems will persist, both for ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ forms of ethical naturalism, unless ethical naturalists adopt what I call ‘Practical Realism’ about essential human form. Such a Practical Realism leaves open the possibility of radical social and political criticism – I therefore suggest that contemporary ethical naturalists ought to be more interested in exploring the affinities their view shares with Marxist political thought.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anscombe
G. E. M.
(1958 ) ‘Modern Moral Philosophy ’, Philosophy 33 : 1 –19 .
2.
Anscombe
G. E. M.
(2000 ) Intention . Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
3.
Davidson
Donald
(1978 ) ‘Intending ’, Philosophy of History and Action 11 : 41 –60 .
4.
De Caro
Mario
Macarthur
David
, eds (2004 ) Naturalism in Question . Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
5.
Fink
Hans
(2008 ) ‘Three Sorts of Naturalism ’, in
Lindgaard
J.
(ed.) John McDowell: Experience, Norm, and Nature . Oxford : Blackwell , pp. 52 –72 .
6.
Foot
Philippa
(2001 ) Natural Goodness . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
7.
Freyenhagen
Fabian
(2013 ) Adorno’s Practial Philosophy: Living Less Wrongly Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
8.
Harris
Sam
(2010 ) The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values . New York : Free Press .
9.
Marx
Karl
(2000 ) ‘Alienated Labour ’, in
McLellan
D.
(ed.) Karl Marx: Selected Writings . Oxford : Oxford University Press , pp. 85 –95 .
10.
McDowell
John
(1996 ) Mind and World . Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
11.
McDowell
John
(1998 ) ‘Two Sorts of Naturalism’ , in his Mind, Value, & Reality . Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press , pp. 167 –97 .
12.
McDowell
John
(2002 ) ‘Response to J. M. Bernstein ’, in
Smith
N. H.
(ed.) Reading McDowell: On Mind and World . London : Routledge , pp. 219 –25 .
13.
McDowell
John
(2008 ) ‘Response to Halbig ’, in
Lindgaard
Jakob
(ed.) John McDowell: Experience, Norm, and Nature . Oxford : Blackwell , pp. 219 –25 .
14.
Thompson
Michael
(2013 ) ‘Forms of Nature: “first,” “second,” “living,” “rational” and “phronetic” , accessed 17 March 2015, accessible @ : http://academia.edu/9666637/Forms_of_nature_first_second_living_rational_and_phronetic
15.
Whyman
Tom
(2016 ) ‘Understanding Adorno on Natural-Hitory ’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24 (4 ): 452 –72 .
16.
Whyman
Tom
(2017 ) ‘Adorno’s Aristotle Critque and Ethical Naturalism ’, European Journal of Philosophy via Early View .