In his most recent work, McDowell argues that the oscillation between the Myth of the Given and coherentism can be avoided only by an ‘equipoise’ between the objective and the subjective. However, I argue that Adorno’s ‘cognitive utopia’ is a genuine 4th option distinct from equipoise and from the oscillation between the Myth of the Given and coherentism. McDowell’s inability to acknowledge the cognitive utopia is traced to his overly abstract conception of the disenchantment of nature, in contrast to Adorno’s emphasis on the domination of nature. This difference is traced to their different interpretations of Hegel.
AdornoT. (1973) Negative Dialectics, trans. AshtonE. B.. New York: Continuum.
2.
AdornoT. (1982) Against Epistemology: A Metacritique, trans. DomingoW.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
3.
AdornoT. (1994) ‘The Experiential Content of Hegel’s Philosophy’, in Hegel: Three Studies, trans. NicholsenS.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 53–88.
4.
AdornoT. (1998) ‘On Subject and Object’, in Critical Models: Intervention and Catchwords, trans. PickfordH.. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 245–58.
5.
AdornoT. (2001) Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, trans. LivingstoneR.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
BernsteinJ. M. (2001) Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BernsteinJ. M. (2002) ‘Re-enchanting Nature’, in SmithN. S. (ed.) Reading McDowell: On Mind and World. New York: Routledge, pp. 217–45.
8.
BernsteinR. J. (2002) ‘McDowell’s Domesticated Hegelianism’, in SmithN. S. (ed.) Reading McDowell: On Mind and World. New York: Routledge, pp. 9–24.
9.
BilgramiA. (2010) ‘The Wider Significance of Naturalism: A Genealogical Essay’, in de CaroM.MacarthurDavid (eds) Naturalism and Normativity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BowieA. (2009) ‘“Unreduced Experience in the Medium of Conceptual Reflection”: Adorno and the Future of Post-analytical Philosophy’, Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, vol. 44. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen, pp. 7–33.
11.
DeVriesW. A.TriplettT. (2000) Knowledge, Mind, and the Given. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
12.
FinkeS. (2001) ‘Concepts and Intuitions: Adorno after the Linguistic Turn’, Inquiry44: 171–200.
13.
FosterR. (2007) Adorno: The Recovery of Experience. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
14.
GaskinR. (2006) Experience and the World’s Own Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
HaddockA. (2008) ‘McDowell and Idealism’, Inquiry51
(1): 79–96.
16.
HammerE. (2000) ‘Minding the World: Adorno’s Critique of Idealism’, Philosophy & Social Criticism26
(1): 71–92.
17.
HammerE. (2005) Adorno and the Political. New York: Routledge.
18.
HannaR. (2001) Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
HegelG. (1977) Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. MillerA. V.. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
HoulgateS. (2008) ‘Thought and Experience in Hegel and McDowell’, in LindgaardJ. (ed.) John McDowell: Experience, Norm, and Nature. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 92–111.
21.
LovibondS. (2008) ‘Practical Reason and Its Animal Precursors’, in LindgaardJ. (ed.) John McDowell: Experience, Norm, and Nature. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 112–23.
22.
MacdonaldG. (2006) ‘The Two Natures: Another Dogma?’, in MacdonaldCynthiaMacdonaldGraham (eds) McDowell and His Critics. New York: Blackwell, pp. 222–35.
23.
MaherC. (2012) The Pittsburgh School of Philosophy: Sellars, McDowell, Brandom. New York: Routledge.
24.
McDowellJ. (1996) Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
McDowellJ. (2002) ‘Response to Bernstein’, in SmithN. (ed.) Reading McDowell: On Mind and World. New York: Routledge, pp. 297–305.
26.
McDowellJ. (2006) ‘Response to Macdonald’, in MacdonaldCynthiaMacdonaldGraham (eds) McDowell and His Critics. New York: Blackwell, pp. 235–7.
27.
McDowellJ. (2009a) ‘Experiencing the World’, in McDowellJ., The Engaged Intellect. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 243–56.
28.
McDowellJ. (2009b) ‘Naturalism in Philosophy of Mind’, in McDowellJ., The Engaged Intellect. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 257–75.
29.
McDowellJ. (2009c) ‘Sellars on Perceptual Experience’, in McDowellJ., Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 3–22.
30.
McDowellJ. (2009d) ‘Hegel’s Idealism as Radicalization of Kant’, in McDowellJ., Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 69–89.
31.
McDowellJ. (2009e) ‘The Apperceptive I and the Empirical Self: Towards a Heterodox Reading of “Lordship and Bondage” in Hegel’s Phenomenology’, in McDowellJ., Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 147–65.
32.
McDowellJ. (2009f) ‘Avoiding the Myth of the Given’, in McDowellJ., Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 256–72.
33.
O’ConnorB. (2004) ‘Adorno and the Problem of Givenness’, Revue Internationale De Philosophie58
(227): 85–99.
34.
PinkardT. (2008) ‘What is a “Shape of Spirit”?’, in MoyarDeanQuanteMichael (eds) Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: A Critical Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–29.
35.
ReddingP. (2007) Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
SachsC. (2012) ‘Resisting Disenchantment: McDowell and the Question of Animal Minds’, Inquiry55: 131–47.
37.
SedgwickS. (1997) ‘McDowell’s Hegelianism’, European Journal of Philosophy5: 21–38.
38.
ShortJ. (2007) ‘Experience and Aura: Adorno, McDowell, and “Second Nature”’, in BurkeD.. (eds) Adorno and the Need in Thinking: New Critical Essays. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 181–200.
39.
SternR. (1999) ‘Going beyond the Kantian Philosophy: On McDowell’s Hegelian Critique of Kant’, European Journal of Philosophy7: 247–69.
40.
StoneA. (2006) ‘Adorno and the Disenchantment of Nature’, Philosophy & Social Criticism32
(2): 231–53.
41.
TaggartA. (2009) ‘Adorno and the Question of Metaphysics’, in DrakeA. (ed.) New Essays on the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. New York: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 210–35.
42.
TestaI. (2007) ‘Criticism from within Nature: The Dialectic between First and Second Nature from McDowell to Adorno’, Philosophy & Social Criticism33
(4): 473–97.
43.
WestphalK. (2008) ‘Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell’, in LindgaardJ. (ed.) John McDowell: Experience, Norm, and Nature. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 124–51.
44.
WestphalK. (2011) ‘Self-Consciousness, Anti-Cartesianism, and Cognitive Semantics in Hegel’s 1807 Phenomenology’, in HoulgateS.BaurMichael (eds) A Companion to Hegel. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 68–90.
45.
WillF. (1997) ‘Thoughts and Things’, in WestphalK. (ed.) Pragmatism and Realism. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 1–19.
