This article develops the thesis that normative social orders are always fore-structured by horizons of possibilities. The thesis is spelled out against the background of a criticism of ethnomethodology for its hermeneutic deficiency in coping with radical reflexivity. The article contributes to the debates concerning the status of normativity problematic in the cultural disciplines. The concept of hermeneutic pre-normativity is introduced to connote the interpretative fore-structuring of normative inter-subjectivity. Radical reflexivity is reformulated in terms of hermeneutic phenomenology.
ArcherM. S. (2010) ‘The Reflexive Re-turn’, in ArcherM. S. (ed.) Conversations about Reflexivity. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–15.
2.
ArminenI. (2008) ‘Scientific and “Radical” Ethnomethodology: From Incompatible Paradigms to Ethnomethodological Sociology’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences38: 167–91.
3.
BakerG. P.HackerM. S. (2009) Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity. Cambridge, MA and Oxford, Oxon: Wiley-Blackwell.
4.
CzyzewskiM. (1994) ‘Reflexivity of Actors versus Reflexivity of Accounts’, Theory, Culture & Society11: 161–8.
5.
GarfinkelH. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
GarfinkelH. (2007) ‘Four Relations between Literatures of the Social Scientific Movement and their Specific Ethnomethodological Alternates’, in HesterS.FrancisD. (eds) Orders of Ordinary Action: Respecifying Sociological Knowledge. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, pp. 13–32.
7.
GinevD. (2006) The Context of Constitution: Beyond the Edge of Justification. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 247. Dordrecht and Boston, MA: Springer.
8.
HallJ. (1999) Cultures of Inquiry: From Epistemology to Discourse in Sociohistorical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
HarrisM. (1999) Theories of Culture in Postmodern Times. London: Altamira Press.
10.
HeideggerM. (1962[1927]) Being and Time, trans. MacquarrieJ.RobinsonE.. San Francisco, CA: Harper.
11.
HeritageJ. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press.
12.
JayyusiL. (1991) ‘Values and Moral Judgement: Communicative Practice as Moral Order’, in ButtonG. (ed.) Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–51.
13.
JohnsonR.ChamberD.RaghuramP.TincknellE. (2004) The Practice of Cultural Studies. London: Sage.
14.
LynchM. (1992) ‘Extending Wittgenstein: The Pivotal Move from Epistemology to the Sociology of Science’, in PickeringA. (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
LynchM. (1999) ‘Silence in Context: Ethnomethodology and Social Theory’, Human Studies22: 211–33.
16.
LynchM. (2001) ‘Ethnomethodology and the Logic of Practice’, in SchatzkiT. R.KnorrK.Cetinavon SavignyE. (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 131–48.
