My aim in this article is to compare traditional multiculturalist political theory with a new paradigm in which the usual strategies for dealing with cultural diversities are replaced by the tools provided by inferential semantics as developed by Robert Brandom. The upshot is the transition from a landscape which is highly demanding with respect to the common assumptions among different views of the world to a dialogical context in which contrasting beliefs can come to light more freely.
BächtigerA.NiemeyerS.NebloM.SteenbergenM. R.SteinerJ. (2010) ‘Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities’, Journal of Political Philosophy18: 32–63.
2.
BenhabibS. (2002) The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BenhabibS. (2006) ‘Another Cosmopolitanism’, in BenhabibS., Another Cosmopolitanism, com. Jeremy Waldron, ed. Robert Post. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–80.
4.
BohmanJ. (2000) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
BrandomR. B. (1994) Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BrandomR. B. (2000) Articulating Reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BrandomR. B. (2009) Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CliffordJ. (1988) The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
DeveauxM. (2000) Cultural Pluralism and the Dilemmas of Justice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
FerraraA. (2012) ‘Hyper-pluralism and the Multivariate Democratic Polity’, Philosophy & Social Criticism38: 435–44.
ForstR. (2001) ‘The Rule of Reasons: Three Models of Deliberative Democracy’, Ratio Juris14: 348–75; reprinted (2011) in his The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 155–87.
13.
ForstR. (2013) Toleration in Conflict: Past and Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
FossenT. (forthcoming) ‘Politicizing Brandom’s Pragmatism: Normativity and the Agonal Character of Social Practice’, European Journal of Philosophy.
15.
GaleottiA. E. (2002) Toleration as Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GrönertP. (2005) ‘Brandom’s Solution to the Objectivity Problem’, Pragmatics and Cognition13: 161–75.
17.
HabermasJ. (1989[1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.
HabermasJ. (1994) Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
HabermasJ. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
HabermasJ. (2000) ‘From Kant to Hegel: On Robert Brandom’s Pragmatic Philosophy of Language’, European Journal of Philosophy8: 322–55; reprinted (2003) in HabermasJ., Truth and Justification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 131–74.
21.
HabermasJ. (2003) Truth and Justification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
HabermasJ. (2006) ‘Religion in the Public Sphere’, European Journal of Philosophy14: 1–25.
23.
HannerzU. (1992) Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Organization of Meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
KymlickaW. (1995) Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
LaurierD. (2005) ‘Pragmatics, Pittsburgh Style’, Pragmatics and Cognition13: 141–60.
26.
MarchettoniL. (2009) ‘Meaning, Dispositions and Supervenience’, in AmorettiC.PencoC.PittoF. (eds) Towards an Analytic Pragmatism: Workshop on Bob Brandom’s Recent Philosophy of Language, CEUR Workshop Proceedings444, pp. 100–11, accessible @: http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-444/
27.
MarchettoniL. (2012) Relativismo e differenza culturale [Relativism and Cultural Difference]. Rome: Nuova Cultura.
28.
ParekhB. (2006) Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
PrienB. (2010) ‘Robert Brandom on Communication, Reference and Objectivity’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies18: 433–58.
30.
RawlsJ. (1996) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
RazJ. (1994) ‘Multiculturalism: a Liberal Perspective’, Dissent41: 67–79.
32.
RouseJ. (2006) ‘Practice Theory’, in TurnerS.RisjordM. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, vol. 15, The Philosophy of Sociology and Anthropology. Dordrecht: Elsevier, pp. 639–82.
33.
SchwartzmanM. (2012) ‘The Ethics of Reasoning from Conjecture’, Journal of Moral Philosophy9: 521–44.
34.
TaylorC. M. (1994) ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in GutmanA. (ed.) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 25–74.
35.
TullyJ. (2002) ‘The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy’, Modern Law Review65: 204–28.
36.
WandererJ. (2008) Robert Brandom. Stocksfield, Northd: Acumen.
37.
WeissB.WandererJ. (2010) Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit. London: Routledge.
38.
YoungI. M. (2002) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
