Social philosophy is a somewhat broad and imprecise term. In this article I discuss the social philosophy of Habermas, Foucault and Honneth, arguing that the latter’s work is an interesting, but not unproblematic, conception of the discipline. Following Habermas and Honneth, I argue that social philosophy should be reconstructive, but incorporate insights from Foucault. Specifically, reconstructive social philosophy can be both normative and descriptive, and at the same time establish a dialectical relationship between philosophy and the social sciences, thus fulfilling the ambition for social philosophy originally put forward by Horkheimer. The thesis I defend in this article is that reconstructive social philosophy in Habermasian or Honnethian fashion has the resources available to accomplish this ambitious task.
AshendenSamanthaOwenDavid (1999) Foucault contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory. London: Sage.
2.
BrinkBert van denOwenDavid (2007) ‘Introduction’, in Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–30.
DerantyJean-Philippe (2009) Beyond Communication: A Critical Study of Axel Honneth’s Social Philosophy. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.
6.
DubielHelmut (1978) Wissenschaftorganisation und politische Erfahrung. Studien zur frühen kritischen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. English-language edn (1985) Theory and Politics: Studies in the Development of Critical Theory, intro. Martin Jay, trans. B. Gregg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
FarsethåsHans Christian (2006) ‘Forsørgelsesbyrden. En samtale med Foucault om biopolitikk, rasjonalitet og regjeringskunst’[The Burden of Support: a Conversation with Foucault on Biopolitics, Rationality and Governmentality], Mastergradsoppgave [Master’s thesis], Filosofisk institutt [Department of Philosophy], University of Bergen.
FoucaultMichel (1990) The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage.
10.
FoucaultMichel (1991a) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth, Mx: Penguin.
11.
FoucaultMichel (1991b) ‘Truth and Power’, in The Foucault Reader, ed. RabinowPaul. Harmondsworth, Mx: Penguin, pp. 51–75.
12.
FoucaultMichel (1991c) ‘What is Enlightenment’,, in The Foucault Reader, ed. RabinowPaul. Harmondsworth, Mx: Penguin, pp. 32–50.
13.
FoucaultMichel (2008) ‘My Body, this Paper, this Fire’, in FoucaultMichel, History of Madness. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 550–74.
14.
FraserNancy (1989) ‘Foucault on Modern Power: Empirical Insights and Normative Confusions’, in FraserNancy, Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Oxford: Polity Press, pp. 17–34.
15.
GeussRaymond (2008) Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
16.
GrimenHarald (2010) ‘Michel Foucault: Styring, makt og motstand’ [Michel Foucault: Government, Power, Resistance], in PedersenJørgen (ed.) Moderne Politisk Teori[Contemporary Political Theory]. Oslo: Pax forlag, pp. 226–47.
17.
HabermasJürgen (1974) ‘The Classical Doctrine of Politics in Relation to Social Philosophy’, in Theory and Practice, trans. ViertelJ.. London: Heinemann, pp. 41–81.
18.
HabermasJürgen (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Heinemann.
19.
HabermasJürgen (1983) ‘Interpretive Social Science vs. Hermeneuticism’, in HaanNormaBellahRobert N.RabinowPaulSullivanWilliam M., Social Science as Moral Inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 251–69.
20.
HabermasJürgen (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, volume One, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
HabermasJürgen (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
HabermasJürgen (2005) ‘Concluding Comments on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics’, Acta Politica40(3): 384–92.
23.
HeathJoseph (1998) ‘What is a Validity Claim?’, Philosophy & Social Criticism24(4): 23–41.
24.
HonnethAxel (1991) The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
HonnethAxel (1995a) The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26.
HonnethAxel (1995b) The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
HonnethAxel (2002) ‘Grounding Recognition: a Rejoinder to Critical Questions’, Inquiry45(4): 499–519.
28.
HonnethAxel (2007a) ‘Pathologies of the Social: The Past and Present of Social Philosophy’, in Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 3–48.
29.
HonnethAxel (2007b) ’Rekonstruktive Gesellschaftskritik unter genealogischem Vorbehalt. Zur Idee der Kritik in der Frankfurter Schule’, in HonnethAxel, Pathologien der Vernunft. Geschicthe und Gegenwart der Kritische Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 57–69. English-language edn (2009) see below.
30.
HonnethAxel (2007c) ‘Moral Consciousness and Class Domination: Some Problems in the Analysis of Hidden Morality’, in Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 80–94.
31.
HonnethAxel (2008) Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
HonnethAxel (2009) ‘Reconstructive Social Criticism with a Genealogical Proviso: On the Idea of Critique in the Frankfurt School’, in HonnethAxel, Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory. New York. Columbia University Press, ch. 3.
HorkheimerMax (1993) ‘The Present Situation of Social Philosophy and the Task of an Institute for Social Research’, in Between Philosophy and Social Science: Selected Early Writings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–14.
35.
HorkheimerMaxAdornoTheodor (2002) Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
IserMattias (2008) Empörung und Fortschritt. Grundlagen einer kritischen Theorie der Gesellschaft[Indignation and Progress: Foundations for a Critical Social Theory]. Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag.
38.
KellyMichael ed. (1994) Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
KingMatthew (2009) ‘Clarifying the Foucault–Habermas Debate: Morality, Ethics and “Normative Foundations”’, Philosophy & Social Criticism35(3): 287–314.
40.
KroghThomas (1991) Fra Frankfurt til Hollywood. Frankfurterskolen fra 1930–1945[From Frankfurt to Hollywood: The Frankfurt School from 1930 to 1945]. Oslo: Aschehoug.
41.
McCarthyThomas (1990) ‘The Critique of Impure Reason: Foucault and the Frankfurt School’, Political Theory18(3): 437–69.
42.
McCarthyThomas (1991) Ideals and Illusions. On Reconstruction and Deconstruction in Contemporary Critical Theory. Cambridge. MIT Press.
43.
NeumannIver B. (2001) Mening, materialitet, makt. En innføring i diskursanalyse[Meaning, Materiality, Power: An Introduction to Discourse Analysis]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
44.
PedersenJørgen (2008) Habermas' method: Rational reconstruction. InPhilosophy of the Social Sciences. 38(4): 457–485.
45.
PedersenJørgen (2009) ‘Habermas and the Political Sciences: The Relationship between Theory and Practice’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences39: 381–407.
46.
PedersenJørgen (2010) Book Review: Jean-Phillippe Deranty's Beyond Communication. A Critical Study of Axel Honneth's Social Philosophy. InCritical Horizons. 10(3): 497–500.
47.
RortyRichard (1989) Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
RortyRichard (2000) ‘Response to Jürgen Habermas’, in BrandomRobert B. (ed.) Rorty and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, ch. 3.
49.
RöttgersKurt (2002) Kategorien der Sozialphilosophie[Categories in Social Philosophy]. Magdeburg: Scriptum Verlag.
50.
SöllnerAlfons (1979) Geschichte und Herrschaft: Studien zur Materialistischen Sozialwissenschaft 1929–1942[History and Domination: Studies in Materialist Social Science 1929–1942]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
51.
VeynePaul (1993) ‘The Final Foucault and his Ethics’, Critical Inquiry20(1): 1–9.
