In a recent article, Iris Marion Young raises several challenges to deliberative democracy on behalf of political activists. In this paper, the author defends a version of deliberative democracy against the activist challenges raised by Young and devises challenges to activism on behalf of the deliberative democrat.
Ackerman, Bruce (1989) ‘Why Dialogue?’ , Journal of Philosophy86: 16-27 .
2.
Ackerman, Bruce and Fishkin, James (2003) ‘Deliberation Day’, in Fishkin and Laslett, 2003, pp. 7-30.
3.
Barber, Benjamin (1984) Strong Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press .
4.
Barber, Benjamin (1998) A Place for Us. New York: Hill & Wang .
5.
Benhabib, Seyla , ed. (1996a) Democracy and Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
6.
Benhabib, Seyla (1996b) ‘Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy’, in Benhabib, 1996a, pp. 67-94.
7.
Benhabib, Seyla (2002) The Claims of Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
8.
Bessette, Joseph M. (1994) The Mild Voice of Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
9.
Bohman, James (1996) Public Deliberation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
10.
Bohman, James (1998) ‘The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy’ , Journal of Political Philosophy6, 4: 400-425 .
11.
Bohman, James and Rehg, William , eds (1997) Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
12.
Cohen, Joshua (1996) ‘Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy’, in Benhabib, 1996a, pp. 95-119.
13.
Cohen, Joshua (1997) ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy’, in Bohman and Rehg, 1997, pp. 67-92.
14.
Connolly, William (1993) Identity/Difference. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
15.
Dryzek, John (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press .
16.
Dryzek, John (2001) ‘Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy’ , Political Theory29, 5: 651-669 .
17.
Estlund, David (1990) ‘Democracy Without Preference’ , The Philosophical Review49: 397-423 .
18.
Estlund, David (1997) ‘Beyond Fairness and Deliberation’, in Bohman and Rehg, 1997, pp. 173-204.
19.
Fish, Stanley (1999) ‘Mutual Respect as a Device of Exclusion’, in Macedo, 1999, pp. 88-102.
20.
Fishkin, James S. (1991) Democracy and Deliberation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
21.
Fishkin, James S. and Laslett, Peter , eds (2003) Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing .
22.
Forst, Rainer (2001) ‘The Rule of Reasons’ , Ratio Juris14, 4: 345-378 .
23.
Freeman, Samuel (2000) ‘Deliberative Democracy: a Sympathetic Comment’ , Philosophy & Public Affairs29, 4: 371-418 .
24.
Friedman, Marilyn (2000) ‘Rawls and the Political Coercion of Unreasonable People’, in Victoria Davion and Clark Wolf (eds) The Idea of a Political Liberalism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield .
25.
Galston, William (1999) ‘Diversity, Toleration, and Deliberative Democracy’, in Macedo, 1999, pp. 39-48.
26.
George, Robert (1999) ‘Law, Democracy, and Moral Disagreement’, in Macedo, 1999, pp. 184-197.
27.
George, Robert and Wolfe, Christopher , eds (2000) Natural Law and Public Reason. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press .
28.
Goodin, Robert E. (2003) Reflective Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press .
29.
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis (1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
30.
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis (2000) ‘Why Deliberative Democracy is Different’, in Ellen Frankel Paul , Fred Miller and Jeffrey Paul (eds) Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Habermas, Jürgen (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
33.
Hampshire, Stuart (2000). Justice is Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
34.
Honig, Bonnie (1993) Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
35.
Hunold, Christian and Young, Iris (1998) ‘Justice, Democracy, and Hazardous Sitting’ , Political StudiesXLVI: 82-95 .
36.
Knight, Jack (1999) ‘Constitutionalism and Deliberative Democracy’, in Macedo, 1999, pp. 159-169.
37.
Knight, Jack and Johnson, James (1994) ‘Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy’ , Political Theory22: 277-296 .
38.
Larmore, Charles (1996) The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
39.
List, Christian and Goodin, Robert (2001) ‘Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem’ , Journal of Political Philosophy9, 3: 277-306 .
40.
Macedo, Stephen , ed. (1999) Deliberative Politics. New York: Oxford University Press .
41.
Manin, Bernard (1987) ‘On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation’ , Political Theory15, 3: 338-368 .
42.
Mansbridge, Jane (1980) Beyond Adversarial Democracy. New York: Basic Books .
43.
Mill, John Stuart (1991) On Liberty and Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press .
44.
Miller, David (2003) ‘Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice’, in Fishkin and Laslett, 2003, pp. 182-199.
Mouffe, Chantal (1996) ‘Democracy, Power, and the “Political”’, in Benhabib, 1996a, pp. 245-256.
47.
Mouffe, Chantal (2000) The Democratic Paradox. New York: Verso .
48.
Nagel, Thomas (1991) Equality and Partiality. New York: Oxford University Press .
49.
Nino, Carlos (1996) The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
50.
Pettit, Philip (2003) ‘Deliberative Democracy, the Discursive Dilemma, and Republican Theory’, in Fishkin and Laslett, 2003, pp. 138-162.
51.
Przeworski, Adam (1998) ‘Deliberation and Ideological Domination’, in Jon Elster (ed.) Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
52.
Rawls, John (1996) Political Liberalism, paperback edn. New York: Columbia University Press .
53.
Rawls, John (1999) ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’, in Samuel Freeman (ed.) John Rawls: Collected Papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
54.
Richardson, Henry (1997) ‘Democratic Intentions’, in Bohman and Rehg, 1997, pp. 349-382.
55.
Sandel, Michael (1998) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Scheffler, Samuel (2001) Boundaries and Allegiances. New York: Oxford University Press .
58.
Shapiro, Ian (2003) The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
59.
Stokes, Susan (1998) ‘Pathologies of Deliberation’, in Jon Elster (ed.) Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
60.
Sunstein, Cass (1991) ‘Preferences and Politics’ , Philosophy & Public Affairs20: 3-34 .
61.
Sunstein, Cass (2001a) Republic.com. New Jersey: Princeton University Press .
62.
Sunstein, Cass (2001b) Designing Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press .
63.
Sunstein, Cass (2003) ‘The Law of Group Polarization’, in Fishkin and Laslett, 2003, pp. 80-101.
64.
Swain, Carol (2002) The New White Nationalism in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
65.
Swain, Carol and Nieli, Russ , eds (2003) Contemporary Voices of White Nationalism in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
66.
Talisse, Robert (2003) ‘Rawls on Pluralism and Stability’ , Critical Review15, 1-2: 173-194 .
67.
Tebble, Adam James (2003) ‘Does Inclusion Require Democracy?’ , Political Studies51: 197-214 .
68.
Valadez, Jorge M. (2001) Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitimacy, and Self-Determination in Multicultural Societies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
69.
Young, Iris (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
70.
Young, Iris (1996) ‘Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy’, in Benhabib, 1996a, pp. 120-136.
71.
Young, Iris (1997) ‘Difference as a Resource for Democratic Communication’, in Bohman and Rehg, 1997, pp. 383-406.
72.
Young, Iris (1999) ‘Justice, Inclusion, and Deliberative Democracy’, in Macedo, 1999, pp. 151-158.
73.
Young, Iris (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press .
74.
Young, Iris (2003) ‘Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy’, in Fishkin and Laslett, 2003, pp. 102-120.
