People are stereotyped according to multiple identities—or social categories—at once, giving rise to “intersectional stereotypes” about warmth and competence. Most work on the structural roots of stereotype content—especially intergroup inequalities and divisions of labor—focuses on whole social categories rather than intersectional identities, so it is an open question whether these theories account for intersectional stereotype content as well. I define 96 intersectional “strata” based on gender, sexuality, age, and race/ethnicity and examine the relationships between socioeconomic status (SES) and occupations of people with those identities in census data and survey experiment participants’ perceptions and stereotypes of those identities. Results support a model in which SES, roles, and perceived competitiveness of people with varying intersectional identities lead to intersectional stereotypes that rationalize existing intersectional inequalities and divisions of labor. Findings suggest that intersectional methods and theorizing can improve understanding of stereotypes without sacrificing parsimony.
AbeleAndrea E.HaukeNicolePetersKimLouvetEvaSzymkowAleksandraDuanYanping. 2016. “Facets of the Fundamental Content Dimensions: Agency with Competence and Assertiveness-Communion with Warmth and Morality.” Frontiers in Psychology7:1810. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810.
BauerGreta R.ChurchillSiobhan M.MahendranMayuriWalwynChantelLizotteDanielAngelica Villa-RuedaAlma. 2021. “Intersectionality in Quantitative Research: A Systematic Review of Its Emergence and Applications of Theory and Methods.” SSM – Public Health14:10798. doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798.
5.
BoboLawrence D.1999. “Prejudice as Group Position: Microfoundations of a Sociological Approach to Racism and Race Relations.” Journal of Social Issues55(3):455–72.
6.
BoboLawrence D.CharlesCamille Z.KrysanMariaSimmonsAlicia D.FredericksonGeorge M.2012. “The Real Record of Racial Attitudes.” Pp. 38–83 in Social Trends in American Life: Findings from the General Social Survey Since 1972.
7.
BoutylineAndreiSoterLaura K.2021. “Cultural Schemas: What They Are, How to Find Them, and What to Do Once You’ve Caught One.” American Sociological Review86(4):728–58.
8.
BrewerMarilynn B.LuiLayton. 1989. “The Primacy of Age and Sex in the Structure of Person Categories.” Social Cognition7(3):262–74.
9.
BrowneIreneMisraJoya. 2003. “The Intersection of Gender and Race in the Labor Market.” Annual Review of Sociology29:487–513.
10.
ChandlerJesseRosensweigCheskieMossAaron J.RobinsonJonathanLitmanLeib. 2019. “Online Panels in Social Science Research: Expanding Sampling Methods beyond Mechanical Turk.” Behavior Research Methods51:2022–38.
11.
CollinsPatricia Hill. [2000] 2009. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed.London, UK: Routledge.
12.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2019. Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13.
Di StasioValentinaLarsenEdvard N.2020. “The Racialized and Gendered Workplace: Applying an Intersectional Lens to a Field Experiment on Hiring Discrimination in Five European Labor Markets.” Social Psychology Quarterly83(3):229–50.
14.
DurkheimEmile. 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. New York, NY: The Free Press.
15.
EaglyAlice H.SteffenValerie J.1984. “Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution Women and Men into Social Roles.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46(4):735–54.
16.
Else-QuestNicole M.Shibley HydeJanet. 2016. “Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research: II. Methods and Techniques.” Psychology of Women Quarterly40(3):319–36.
17.
EvansClare R.WilliamsDavid R.OnnelaJukka-PekkaSubramanianS. V.2018. “A Multilevel Approach to Modeling Health Inequalities at the Intersection of Multiple Social Identities.” Social Science and Medicine203:64–73.
18.
FiskeSusan T.CuddyAmy J. C.GlickPeterXuJun. 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82(6):878–902.
19.
HallErika A.HallAlison V.GalinskyAdam D.PhillipsKatherine W.2019. “MOSAIC: A Model of Stereotyping through Associated and Intersectional Categories.” Academy of Management Review44(3):643–72.
20.
HarknessSarah. 2022. “Construction and the Spread of Status.” Pp. 132–54 in Unequals: The Power of Status and Expectations in Our Social Lives, edited by WebsterM.WalkerL. S.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
HauserOliver P.NortonMichael I.2017. “(Mis)Perceptions of Inequality.” Current Opinion in Psychology18:21–25.
22.
HeisermanNicholas. 2023. “Intersectional Complexity in Stereotype Content.” American Journal of Sociology129(3):753–95.
23.
HeisermanNicholasSimpsonBrent. 2021. “Measures of Perceived Economic Inequality and Justice: An Empirical Assessment.” Social Justice Research34:119–45.
KochAlexImhoffRolandUnkelbachChristianNicolasGandalfFiskeSusanTeracheJulieCarrierAntoninYzerbytVincent. 2020. “Groups’ Warmth Is a Personal Matter: Understanding Consensus on Stereotype Dimensions Reconciles Adversarial Models of Social Evaluation.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology89:103995. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103995.
26.
KoenigAnne M.EaglyAlice H.2014. “Evidence for the Social Role Theory of Stereotype Content: Observations of Groups’ Roles Shape Stereotypes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology107(3):371–92.
27.
KoenigAnne M.EaglyAlice H.2019. “Typical Roles and Intergroup Relations Shape Stereotypes: How Understanding Social Structure Clarifies the Origins of Stereotype Content.” Social Psychology Quarterly82(2):205–30.
28.
KrausMichael W.Won ParkJunTanJacinth J. X.2017. “Signs of Social Class: The Experience of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life.” Perspectives on Psychological Science12(3):422–35.
29.
LeiRyan F.LeshinRachel A.RhodesMarjorie. 2020. “The Development of Intersectional Social Prototypes.” Psychological Science31(8):911–26.
30.
LitmanLeibRobinsonJonathan. 2021. Conducting Online Research on Amazon Mechanical Turk and beyond. London, UK: Sage.
31.
LizotteDaniel J.MahendranMayuriChurchillSiobhan M.BauerGreta. 2020. “Math Versus Meaning in MAIHDA: A Commentary on Multilevel Statistical Models for Quantitative Intersectionality.” Social Science & Medicine245:112500. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112500.
32.
McCallLeslie. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs30(3):1771–800.
33.
MizeTrenton D.ManagoBianca. 2018. “The Stereotype Content of Sexual Orientation.” Social Currents5(5):458–78.
34.
MonkEllis. 2022. “Inequality without Groups: Contemporary Theories of Categories, Intersectional Typicality, and the Disaggregation of Difference.” Sociological Theory40(1):3–27.
35.
NavarreteCarlos DavidMcDonaldMelissa M.MolinaLudwin E.SidaniusJim. 2010. “Prejudice at the Nexus of Race and Gender: An Outgroup Male Target Hypothesis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98(6):933–45.
36.
NicolasGandalfde la FuenteMalenaFiskeSusan T.2017. “Mind the Gap in Multiple Categorization: A Review of Crossed Categorization, Intersectionality, and Multiracial Perception.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations20(5):621–31.
37.
NicolasGandalfFiskeSusan T.2023. “Valence Biases and Emergence in the Stereotype Content of Intersecting Social Categories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General152(9):2520–43.
PedullaDavid S.2014. “The Positive Consequences of Negative Stereotypes: Race, Sexual Orientation, and the Job Application Process.” Social Psychology Quarterly77(1):75–94.
40.
PedullaDavid S.2018. “How Race and Unemployment Shape Labor Market Opportunities: Additive, Amplified, or Muted Effects?” Social Forces96(4):1477–506.
41.
RidgewayCecilia L.2018. “Status Construction Theory.” Pp. 315–39 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, 2nd ed., edited by BurkeP. J.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42.
RidgewayCecilia L.2019. Status: Why Is It Everywhere? Why Does It Matter?New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
43.
RidgewayCecilia L.Kricheli-KatzTamar. 2013. “Intersecting Cultural Beliefs in Social Relations: Gender, Race, and Class Binds and Freedoms.” Gender and Society27(3):294–318.
44.
RobinsonDawn T.Smith-LovinLynn. 2018. “Affect Control Theories of Social Interaction and Self.” Pp. 139–65 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, 2nd ed, edited by BurkeP. J.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
SchugJoannaAltNicholas P.Christoph KlauerKarl. 2015. “Gendered Race Prototypes: Evidence for the Non-prototypicality of Asian Men and Black Women.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology56:121–25. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.012.
47.
SeskoAmanda K.BiernatMonica. 2010. “Prototypes of Race and Gender: The Invisibility of Black Women.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology46(2):356–60.
48.
SewellWilliam H.1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology98(1):1–29.
49.
StolierRyan M.FreemanJonathan. 2016. “Neural Pattern Similarity Reveals the Inherent Intersection of Social Categories.” Nature Neuroscience19(6):795–97.
50.
TalaskaCara A.FiskeSusan T.ChaikenShelly. 2008. “Legitimating Racial Discrimination: Emotions, Not Beliefs, Predict Discrimination in a Meta-analysis.” Social Justice Research21(3):263–96.
51.
TilcsikAndrás. 2021. “Statistical Discrimination and the Rationalization of Stereotypes.” American Sociological Review86(1): 93–122.
52.
TilcsikAndrásAntebyMichelKnightCarly R.2015. “Concealable Stigma and Occupational Segregation: Toward a Theory of Gay and Lesbian Occupations.” Administrative Science Quarterly60(3):446–81.
53.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDonaldAvent-HoltDustin. 2019. Relational Inequalities: An Organizational Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54.
WebsterMurrayWalkerLisa Slattery. 2022. “Status and Expectation Processes.” Pp. 1–24in Unequals: The Power of Status and Expectations in Our Social Lives, edited by WebsterM.WalkerL. S.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
