A critical lever in the fight against poverty is to improve attitudes toward those living in poverty. Attempting to understand the factors that impact these attitudes, we ask: Does believing that meritocracy exists (descriptive meritocracy) sustain negative attitudes? Using cross-sectional (N = 301) and experimental (N = 439) methods, we found that belief in the United States as a meritocracy is associated with blaming people living in poverty and predicts negative attitudes toward them. Replicating and extending these findings, we experimentally manipulated beliefs in meritocracy and blame. Weakening American Dream beliefs predicted improved attitudes toward those in poverty. Understanding the nuanced role of belief systems in attitudes toward those in poverty provides strategies for promoting more positive thoughts and feelings.
AdlerNancy E.EpelElissa S.CastellazzoGraceIckovicsJeannette R.2000. “Relationship of Subjective and Objective Social Status with Psychological and Physiological Functioning: Preliminary Data in Healthy White Women.” Health Psychology19:586–92. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586.
2.
AlstonPhilip. 2018. Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights on His Mission to the United States of America. New York, NY: Human Rights Council, United Nations.
3.
ChmielewskiMichaelKuckerSarah C.2019. “An MTurk Crisis? Shifts in Data Quality and the Impact on Study Results.” Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi:10.1177/1948550619875149.
4.
ChristandlFabian2013. “The Belief in a Just World as a Personal Resource in the Context of Inflation and Financial Crises.” Applied Psychology62:486–518. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00489.x.
5.
CoppockAlexanderLeeperThomas J.MullinixKevin J.2018. “Generalizability of Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimates across Samples.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(49):12441–12446. doi:10.1073/pnas.1808083115
6.
CozzarelliCatherineWilkinsonAnna V.TaglerMichael J.2001. “Attitudes toward the Poor and Attributions for Poverty.” Journal of Social Issues57:207–27207–27. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00209.
7.
CrandallChristian S.1994. “Negative Attitudes toward Fat People: Ideology and Self-Interest.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology66:882–94882–94. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.882.
8.
DarnonCélineWiederkehrVirginieDompnierBenoîtMartinotDelphine. 2018. “‘Where There Is a Will, There Is a Way’: Belief in School Meritocracy and the Social-Class Achievement Gap.” British Journal of Social Psychology57:250–62. doi:10.1111/bjso.12214.
9.
DavisRosie P.WilliamsWendy R.2020. “Bringing Psychologists to the Fight against Deep Poverty.” American Psychologist75(5):655–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000650.
10.
DayMartin V.FiskeSusan T.2017. “Movin’ on up? How Perceptions of Social Mobility Affect Our Willingness to Defend the System.” Social Psychological and Personality Science8:267–74267–74. doi:10.1177/1948550616678454.
11.
DennisSean A.GoodsonBrian M.PearsonChris. 2018. “MTurk Workers’ Use of Low-Cost ‘Virtual Private Servers’ to Circumvent Screening Methods: A Research Note.”https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3233954.
12.
DuranteFedericaTablanteCourtney B.FiskeSusan T.2017. “Poor but Warm, Rich but Cold (and Competent): Social Classes in the Stereotype Content Model.” Journal of Social Issues73:138–57138–57. doi:10.1111/josi.12208.
13.
FranzFaulErdfelderEdgarLangAlbert-GeorgBuchnerAxel. 2007. “G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences.” Behavior Research Methods39:175–91175–91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
14.
FiskeSusan T.CuddyAmy J. C.GlickPeterXuJun. 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82:878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.
HayesAndrew F.2017. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. 2nd ed.New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
17.
HeisermanNicholasSimpsonBrentWillerRobb. 2020. “Judgments of Economic Fairness Are Based More on Perceived Economic Mobility Than Perceived Inequality.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 6. doi:10.1177/2378023120959547.
18.
HuberJoanFormWilliam H.1973. Income and Ideology. New York, NY: The Free Press.
19.
HuntMatthew O.BullockHeather. 2016. Ideologies and Beliefs about Poverty. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
JostJohn T.BanajiMahzarin R.1994. “The Role of Stereotyping in System-Justification and the Production of False Consciousness.” British Journal of Social Psychology33:1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x.
21.
JostJohn T.HunyadyOrsolya. 2005. “Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies.” Current Directions in Psychological Science14:260–65260–65. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.
22.
JostJohn T.PelhamBrett W.SheldonOliverSullivanBilian Ni. 2003. “Social Inequality and the Reduction of Ideological Dissonance on Behalf of the System: Evidence of Enhanced System Justification among the Disadvantaged.” European Journal of Social Psychology33:13–36. doi:10.1002/ejsp.127.
23.
KluegelJames R.SmithEliot R.1981. “Beliefs about Stratification.” Annual Review of Sociology7:19–56. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.07.080181.000333
24.
KluegelJames R.SmithEliot R.1986. Beliefs about Inequality: Americans’ Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
25.
KrausMichael W.PiffPaul K.KeltnerDacher. 2009. “Social Class, Sense of Control, and Social Explanation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology97(6):992–1004. doi:10.1037/a0016357.
26.
LottBernice. 2002. “Cognitive and Behavioral Distancing from the Poor.” American Psychologist57(2):100–10. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.100.
27.
MadeiraAna F.Costa-LopesRuiDovidioJohn F.FreitasGonçaloMascarenhasMafalda F.2019. “Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations.” Frontiers in Psychology10:2007. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02007.
28.
MijsJonathan J. B.2019. “The Paradox of Inequality: Income Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy Go Hand in Hand.” SocioEconomic Review2019:my051. doi:10.1093/ser/mwy051.
29.
PiffPaul K.KrausMichael W.KeltnerDacher. 2018. “Unpacking the Inequality Paradox: The Psychological Roots of Inequality and Social Class.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology57:53–124. doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.10.002.
30.
PiffPaul K.WiwadDylanRobinsonAngela R.AkninLara B.MercierBrettShariffAzim. 2020. “Shifting Attributions for Poverty Motivates Opposition to Inequality and Enhances Egalitarianism.”Nature Human Behavior4(5):496–505. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0835-8.
31.
PikettyThomasSaezEmmanuelZucmanGabriel. 2017. “Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics133:553–609. doi:10.1093/qje/qjx043.
32.
PirlottAngelaMacKinnonDavid P.2016. “Design Approaches to Experimental Mediation.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology66:29–38. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012.
33.
PrattoFeliciaSidaniusJimStallworthLisa M.MalleBertram F.1994. “Social Dominance Orientation: A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67:741–63741–63. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.
34.
Schön brodtFelix D.PeruginiMarco. 2013. “At What Sample Size Do Correlations Stabilize?” Journal of Research in Personality47:609–12609–12.
35.
Son HingLeanne S.BobocelD. RamonaZannaMark P.GarciaDonna M.GeeStephanie S.OraziettiKatie. 2011. “The Merit of Meritocracy.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology101:433–50433–50. doi:10.1037/a0024618.
36.
WeinerBernard. 1995. Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a Theory of Social Conduct. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
37.
WeinerBernardPerryRaymond P.MagnussonJamie. 1988. “An Attributional Analysis of Reactions to Stigmas.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology55:738–48738–48. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.738.
38.
WoodDustinHarmsPeter D.LowmanGraham H.DeSimoneJustin A.2017. “Response Speed and Response Consistency as Mutually Validating Indicators of Data Quality in Online Samples.” Social Psychological and Personality Science8:454–64454–64. doi:10.1177/1948550617703168.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
