This article reviews conceptualizations from three academic areas: the sociology of art, the psychology of creativity, and research on the cultural and creative industries. These are compared with findings from a critical discursive study with UK practitioners. The meanings and associations these maker artists attach to creativity are discussed as a practitioner concept. For the practitioners, the association of creativity with art carries a promise of transcendence and escape from ordinary life but also a potential challenge to their own entitlement and claims to a creative status. These findings demonstrate that the academic areas utilize different and conflicting conceptualizations and, second, that the practitioner concept is not consistent with any one of these. In conclusion, the contemporary celebration of creativity is based on different meanings and unacknowledged conflicts. Future social psychological research on creativity requires a more critical approach to the concept.
Adarves-YornoImmaculadaPostmesTomHaslamS. Alexander. 2006. “Social Identity and the Recognition of Creativity in Groups.” British Journal of Social Psychology45:479–97.
2.
AdkinsLisaJokinenEeva. 2008. “Introduction: Gender, Living and Labour in the Fourth Shift.” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research16:138–49.
3.
AhlHelene. 2006. “Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30:595–621.
4.
AmabileTeresa. 1983. “The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45:357–76.
BainAlison. 2004. “Female Artistic Identity in Place: The Studio.” Social and Cultural Geography5:171–93.
7.
BanksMark. 2017. Creative Justice: Cultural Industries, Work and Inequality. London: Rowan and Littlefield.
8.
BanksMark. 2007. The Politics of Cultural Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BeckerHoward S.1982. Art Worlds. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
10.
BilligMichael. 1987. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BornGeorgina. 2010. “The Social and the Aesthetic: For a Post-Bourdieuian Theory of Cultural Production.” Cultural Sociology4:171–208.
12.
BotellaMarion. 2018. “The Creative Process in Graphic Art.” Pp. 59–88 in The Creative Process: Perspectives from Multiple Domains, edited by T. Lubart. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
BourdieuPierre. 1996. Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
14.
BourdieuPierreEagletonTerry. 1992. “Doxa and Common Life.” New Left Review191:111–21.
15.
BrocklingUlrich. 2016. The Entrepreneurial Self. London: Sage.
16.
BrouilletteSarah. 2013. “Cultural Work and Antisocial Psychology.” Pp. 40–43 in Theorizing Cultural Work: Labour, Continuity and Change in the Cultural and Creative industries, edited by BanksM.GillR.TaylorS.Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
17.
BrunerJerome. 1987. “Life as Narrative.” Social Research54(1):11–32.
18.
BurnsTom R.MachadoNoraCorteUgo. 2015. “The Sociology of Creativity: Part I: Theory: The Social Mechanisms of Innovation and Creative Developments in Selectivity Environments.” Human Systems Management34(3):179–99.
19.
CaroffXavierLubartTodd. 2012. “Multidimensional Approach to Detecting Creative Potential in Managers.” Creativity Research Journal24:13–20.
20.
Cohen-ColeJamie. 2009. “The Creative American: Cold War Salons, Social Science and the Cure for Modern Society.” Isis100:219–62.
21.
CollinsRandall. 2000. “The Sociology of Philosophies: A Precis.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences30(2):157–201.
22.
ConorBridgetRosalindGillStephanieTaylor. 2015. “Gender and Creative Labour.” The Sociological Review63(1): 1-22.
23.
CsikszentmihalyiMihaly. 2014. The Systems Model of Creativity: The Collected Works of Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi. Dordrecht: Springer.
24.
CsikszentmihalyiMihalySawyerKeith. 2002. The Systems Model of Creativity: The Collected Works of Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi. Dordrecht: Springer.
25.
Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. 2017. Good Work: The Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices. London: HMSO UK.
26.
Department for Culture, Media and Sport. 2001. Creative Industries Mapping Document. London: HMSO UK.
27.
EdleyNigel. 2001. “Analysing Masculinity: Interpretative Repertoires, Subject Positions and Ideological Dilemmas.” Pp. 189–228 in Discourse as Data, edited by WetherellM.TaylorS.YatesS. J.London: Sage.
28.
EdwardsDerek. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
29.
FullerGlenHamiltonCarolineSealeKirsten. 2013. “Working with Amateur Labour: Between Culture and Economy.” Cultural Studies Review19:143–54.
30.
GerberAlison. 2017. The Work of Art. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
GergenKenneth J.1985. “The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology.” American Psychologist40:266–75.
32.
GillRosalindPrattAndy. 2008. “In the Social Factory? Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work.” Theory, Culture and Society25:1–30.
33.
GlaveanuVlad PetreTanggaardLene. 2014. “Creativity, Identity, and Representation: Towards a Socio-Cultural Theory of Creative Identity.” New Ideas in Psychology34:12–21.
34.
HammersleyMartynAtkinsonPaul. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London and New York: Routledge.
35.
HennesseyBeth A.2017. “Taking a Systems View of Creativity: On the Right Path toward Understanding.” The Journal of Creative Behavior51(4):341–44.
36.
HesmondhalghDavid. 2007. The Cultural Industries. London: Sage.
37.
John-SteinerVera. 2000. Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
LubartTodd. 2018. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–18 in The Creative Process: Perspectives from Multiple Domains, edited by LubartT.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
MaslowAbraham H.1962. Toward a Psychology of Being. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.
40.
McRobbieAngela. 2002. “Clubs to Companies: Notes on the Decline of Political Culture in Speeded Up Worlds.” Cultural Studies16:516–31.
41.
McRobbieAngela. 2016. Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries. Cambridge: Polity.
42.
MorganGeorgeNelliganPariece. 2018. The Creativity Hoax: Precarious Work and the Gig Economy. London and New York: Anthem Press.
43.
O’ConnorJustin. 2010. The Cultural and Creative Industries: A Literature Review. London Creativity, Culture and Education.
44.
ParkerJohn N.CorteUgo. 2017. “Placing Collaborative Circles in Strategic Action Fields: Explaining Differences between Highly Creative Groups.” Sociological Theory35(4):261–87.
45.
ReckwitzAndreas. 2017. The Invention of Creativity. Cambridge: Polity.
46.
RoseNikolas. 1996. Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
SawyerR. Keith. 2003. Group Creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48.
SawyerR. Keith. 2007. Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
49.
SennettRichard. 1998. The Corrosion of Character. London and New York: W. W. Norton.
50.
TanggaardLene. 2012. “The Sociomateriality of Creativity in Everyday Life.” Culture and Psychology19:20–32.
51.
TaylorStephanie. 2011. “Negotiating Oppositions and Uncertainties: Gendered Conflicts in Creative Identity Work.” Feminism and Psychology21(3):354–71.
52.
TaylorStephanie. 2012. “‘One Participant Said. . .’: The Implications of Quotations from Biographical Talk.” Qualitative Research12:388–401.
53.
TaylorStephanie. 2015a. “Discursive and Psychosocial? Theorising a Complex Contemporary Subject.” Qualitative Research in Psychology12(1):8–21.
54.
TaylorStephanie. 2015b. “A New Mystique? Working for Yourself in the Neoliberal Economy.” The Sociological Review63:174–87.
55.
TaylorStephanie. 2018. “Beyond Work? New Expectations and Aspirations.” Pp. 327–45 in The New Normal of Working Lives: Critical Studies in Contemporary Work and Employment, edited by TaylorS.LuckmanS.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
56.
TaylorStephanieLittletonKaren. 2006. “Biographies in Talk: A Narrative-Discursive Research Approach.” Qualitative Sociology Review2(1):22–38.
57.
TaylorStephanieLittletonKaren. 2012. Contemporary Identities of Creativity and Creative Work. Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
58.
TaylorStephaniePaludanMarie. 2019. “Transcending Utility? The Gendered Conflicts of a Contemporary Creative Identification.” Feminism and Psychology. doi:10.1177/0959353519864390
59.
TimmermansStefanTavoryIddo. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory30(3):167–86.
60.
VelthiusOlav. 2003. “Symbolic Meanings of Prices: Constructing the Value of Contemporary Art in Amsterdam and New York Galleries.” Theory and Society32:181–215.
61.
WetherellMargaret. 1998. “Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-Structuralism in Dialogue.” Discourse and Society9(3):387–412.
62.
WetherellMargaret. 2001. “Debates in Discourse Research.” Pp. 380–99 in Discourse Theory and Practice, edited by WetherellM.TaylorS.YatesS. J.London: Sage and The Open University.
63.
WhiteHarrisonWhiteCynthia. [1965] 1993. Canvases and Careers: Institutional Change in the French Painting World. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
