Participating in conflict may facilitate the acquisition of social status in a group. We build on theories about the sources of conflict and status to formulate propositions about how conflict affects status mobility in schools. Using two-wave panel data from over 20,000 students in 56 middle schools, we first examine the relationship between change in conflict with schoolmates and change in a network-derived metric of status, betweenness centrality, which is an indicator of being well known. More overall conflict with students is associated with increases in status up to a threshold. Additionally, students who perceive more conflict with others who do not perceive conflict in return also gain status. Finally, more conflict with friends does not increase status. Based on this evidence, we propose a mechanism by which conflict increases status through signaling integration in the school’s social scene rather than through establishing dominance over others, as previous literature suggests.
AndrewsNaomi C. Z.HanishLaura D.SantosCarlos E. 2017. “Does an Aggressor’s Target Choice Matter? Assessing Change in the Social Network Prestige of Aggressive Youth.” Aggressive Behavior43:364–74.
2.
BatscheGeorge M.KnoffHoward M. 1994. “Bullies and Their Victims: Understanding a Pervasive Problem in the Schools.” School Psychology Review23(2):165–74.
3.
BearmanPeterParigiPaolo. 2004. “Cloning Headless Frogs and Other Important Matters: Conversation Topics and Network Structure.” Social Forces82:535–57.
4.
BenardStephen. 2013. “Reputation Systems, Aggression, and Deterrence in Social Interaction.” Social Science Research42:230–45.
5.
BenardStephen. 2015. “The Value of Vengefulness: Reputational Incentives for Initiating Verses Reciprocating Aggression.” Rationality and Society27(2):129–60.
6.
BergerJosephZelditchMorrisJr.1998. Status, Power, and Legitimacy: Strategies and Theories. Abingdon, OX and New York, NY: Transaction Publishers.
7.
BurtRonald S.1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CohenDovNisbettRichard E. 1996. Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press Inc.
9.
CollinsRandall. 2009. Violence: A Micro-Sociological Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
FarisRobert. 2012. “Aggression, Exclusivity, and Status Attainment in Interpersonal Networks.” Social Forces90(4):1207–35.
11.
FarisRobertFelmleeDiane. 2011. “Status Struggles: Network Centrality and Gender Segregation in Same- and Cross-Gender Aggression.” American Sociological Review76(1):48–73.
12.
FaulknerRobert R.2009. “On Sensitizing Concepts.” Pp. 79–91 in Ethnographies Revisited: Constructing Theory in the Field, edited by PuddephattA. J.ShaffirW.KleinknechtS. W. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
13.
FelmleeDianeFarisRobert. 2016. “Toxic Ties: Networks of Friendship, Dating, and Cyber Victimization.” Social Psychology Quarterly79(3):243–62.
14.
FiskeSusan T.2010. “Interpersonal Stratification: Status, Power, and Subordination.” Pp. 941–82 in Handbook of Social Psychology. 5th ed., edited by FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.Lindzey& G. New York: Wiley.
15.
FreemanLinton C.RomneyA. KimballFreemanSue C. 1987. “Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy.” American Anthropologist89(2):311–25.
16.
GoodeWilliam J.1978. The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Social Control System. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17.
GouldRoger V.2002. “The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test.” American Journal of Sociology107(5):1143–78.
18.
GouldRoger V.2003. Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity about Social Rank Breeds Conflict. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
JohnsonDavid. 2005. “Two-Wave Panel Analysis: Comparing Statistical Methods for Studying the Effects of Transitions.” Journal of Marriage and Family67(4):1061–75.
20.
LaursenBrettPursellGwen. 2009. “Conflict in Peer Relationships.” Pp. 267–81 in Social, Emotional, and Personality Development in Context: Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups, edited by RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.LaursenB. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
21.
LiYanWrightMichelle F. 2014. “Adolescents’ Social Status Goals: Relationships to Social Status, Insecurity, and Prosocial Behavior.” Journal Youth Adolescence43:146–60.
22.
LoveTony P.DavisJenny L. 2014. “The Effect of Status on Role-Taking Accuracy.” American Sociological Review79:824–43.
23.
MageeJoe C.GalinskyAdam D. 2008. “Social Hierarchy: The Self-Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status.” Academy of Management Annals2(1):351–98.
24.
MartinJohn Levi. 2009a. “Formation and Stabilization of Vertical Hierarchies among Adolescents: Towards a Quantitative Ethology of Dominance Among Humans.” Social Psychology Quarterly72(3):241–64.
25.
MartinJohn Levi. 2009b. Social Structures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
MazurAllan. 2005. Biosociology of Dominance and Deference. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
27.
MertonRobert K.1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science159:56–63.
28.
OlweusDan. 1993. Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
29.
PaluckElizabeth LevyShepherdHanaAronowPeter A. 2016. “Changing Climates of Conflict: A Social Network Experiment in 56 Schools.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113:566–71.
30.
ParkPatrick S.KimYong-hak. 2017. “Reciprocation under Status Ambiguity: How Dominance Motives and Spread of Status Value Shape Gift Exchange.” Social Networks (47):142–56.
31.
PeetsKätlinHodgesErnest V.E. 2014. “Is Popularity Associated with Aggression toward Socially Preferred or Marginalized Targets?” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology124:112–23.
32.
PrinsteinMitchell J.CillessenAntonius N. H. 2003. “Forms and Functions of Adolescent Peer Aggression Associated with High Levels of Peer Status.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly49(3):310–42.
33.
RidgewayCecilia L.2014. “Why Status Matters for Inequality.” American Sociological Review79:1–16.
34.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J. 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender & Society18:510–31.
35.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J. 2006. “Consensus and the Creation of Status Beliefs.” Social Forces85:431–53.
36.
ShepherdHanaLaneJeffrey. 2019. “In the Mix: Social Integration and Social Media Adoption.” Social Science Research82:1–17.
37.
SkvoretzJohnFararoThomas J. 2016. “Status and Interaction: A Stochastic Model for the Measurement of Macro-Status Value and the Determination of Micro-Status Ranking in Task Group Interaction.” Socius2. doi:10.1177/2378023115621561
38.
SmithJeffrey A.FarisRobert. 2015. “Movement without Mobility: Adolescent Status Hierarchies and the Contextual Limits of Cumulative Advantage.” Social Networks40:139–53.
39.
WillerRobbConlonBridgetRogalinChristabel L.WojnowiczMichael T. 2013. “Overdoing Gender: A Test of the Masculine Overcompensation Thesis.” American Journal of Sociology118(4):980–1022.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
