Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-6
Job Pressure,the Work-Family Interface,and the Sense of Distributive Injustice: An Elaboration of Work-Related Inputs among Twenty-First Century Workers
Research in social psychology demonstrates that the sense of distributive injustice has emotional, health, and behavioral consequences. It is therefore important to assess how individuals come to perceive their earnings as unjust. I provide new insights to this question by integrating perspectives in distributive justice, the stress process, and the work-family interface. Specifically, I describe a model that delineates how excessive work pressures elevate workers’ sense of what they should earn through actions and strains in the work-family interface. Using data from a 2017 sample of Canadian workers, the results indicate that higher job pressure is associated with a greater expectation of rewards. Part of this association is indirect through role blurring behavior and work-to-family conflict, and this mechanism is intensified for parents. Collectively, these discoveries expand the scope of what counts as inputs in shaping employees’ sense of what they should justly earn.
AcockAlan C.2013. Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata (Revised Edition). College Station, TX: StataCorp.
2.
AdamsStacy J.1963. “Toward an Understanding of Inequity.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology67(5): 422–436.
3.
AdamsStacy J.1965. “Inequity in Social Exchange.” Pp. 267–99 in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2, edited by BerkowitzL. New York, NY: Academic Press.
AlvesWayne M.RossiPeter H. 1978. “Who Should Get What? Fairness Judgments of the Distribution of Earnings.” American Journal of Sociology84(3):541–64.
6.
AuspurgKatrinHinzThomasSauerCarsten. 2017. “Why Should Women Get Less? Evidence on the Gender Pay Gap from Multifactorial Survey Experiments.” American Sociological Review82(1):179–210.
7.
BellaviaGina M.FroneMichael R. 2005. “Work-Family Conflict.” Pp. 113–48 in Handbook of Work Stress, edited by BarlingJ.KellowayE. K.FroneM. R. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
BianchiSuzanne M.SayerLiana C.MilkieMelissa A.RobinsonJohn P. 2012. “Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter?”Social Forces91(1):55–63.
9.
BittmanMichaelBrownJudith E.WajcmanJudy. 2009. “The Mobile Phone, Perpetual Contact and Time Pressure.” Work, Employment & Society23(4):673–91.
10.
BlauPeter M.1974. On the Nature of Organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
BowlesSamuelGintisHerbertOsborneMelissa. 2001. “The Determinants of Earnings: A Behavioral Approach.” Journal of Economic Literature39:1137–76.
12.
ChesleyNoelle. 2005. “Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction.” Journal of Marriage and Family67(5):1237–48.
13.
ColquittJason A.ConlonDonald E.WessonMichael J.PorterChristopher O. L. H.NgK Yee. 2001. “Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research.” Journal of Applied Psychology86(3):425–45.
14.
CookKaren S.YamagishiToshio. 1983. “Social Determinants of Equity Judgments,” Pp. 95–126 in Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives, edited by MessickD. M.CookK. S. New York, NY: Praeger Scientific Press.
15.
D’AmbrosioConchitaClarkAndrew E.BarazzettaMarta. 2018. “Unfairness at Work: Well-Being and Quits.” Labour Economics51:307–16.
16.
DermottEsther. 2008. Intimate Fatherhood: A Sociological Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
DesrochersStephanHiltonJeanne M.LarwoodLaurie. 2005. “Preliminary Validation of the Work-Family Integration-Blurring Scale.” Journal of Family Issues26:442–46.
18.
DeutschMorton. 1975. “Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?”Journal of Social Issues31(3):137–49.
19.
DuxburyLinda E.HigginsChristopher A. 1991. “Gender Differences in Work-Family Conflict.” Journal of Applied Psychology76(1):60–74.
20.
DuxburyLindaTowersIanHigginsChristopherThomasJohn A. 2007. “From 9 to 5 to 24/7: How Technology Has Redefined the Workday.” Pp. 305–32 in Information Resources Management: Global Challenges, edited by LawW. K. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
21.
EndersCraig K.2006. “Analyzing Structural Equation Models with Missing Data.” Pp. 225–54 in Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, edited by HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
22.
GatskovaKseniia. 2013. “Distributive Justice Attitudes in Ukraine: Need, Desert, or Social Minimum?”Communist and Post-Communist Studies46:227–41.
23.
GlavinPaulSchiemanScott. 2012. “Work-Family Role Blurring and Work-Family Conflict: The Moderating Influence of Job Resources and Job Demands.” Work and Occupations39:71–98.
24.
GreenFrancis. 2006. Demanding Work: The Paradox of Job Quality in the Affluent Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
GreenhausJeffrey H.BeutellNicholas J. 1985. “Sources of Conflict between Work and Family Roles.” Academy of Management Review10(1):76–88.
26.
GregorichSteven E.2006. “Do Self-Report Instruments Allow Meaningful Comparisons across Diverse Population Groups? Testing Measurement Invariance Using the Confirmatory Factor Analysis Framework.” Medical Care44:S78–94.
27.
HegtvedtKaren A.1990. “The Effects of Relationship Structure on Emotional Responses to Inequity.” Social Psychology Quarterly53:214–28.
28.
HegtvedtKaren A.ParrisChristie L. 2014. “Emotions in Justice Processes.” Pp. 103–25 in Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions: Volume II, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, edited by StetsJ. E.TurnerJ. H. New York: Springer.
29.
HochschildJennifer L.1981. What’s Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
HomansGeorge C.1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
31.
HomansGeorge C.1974. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. Revised ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
32.
HuLi-tzeBentlerPeter M. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives”Structural Equation Modeling6(1):1–55.
33.
HuQiaoSchaufeliWilmar B.TarisToon W. 2013. “Does Equity Mediate the Effects of Job Demands and Job Resources on Work Outcomes? An Extension of the Job Demands-Resources Model.” Career Development International18(4):357–76.
34.
ISSP Research Group. 2012. International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality IV–ISSP 2009. Cologne, Germany: GESIS Data Archive [distributor]. https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/sdesc2.asp?no=5400.
35.
JassoGuillermina. 1978. “On the Justice of Earnings: A New Specification of the Justice Evaluation Function.” American Journal of Sociology83:1398–419.
36.
JassoGuillermina. 1980. “A New Theory of Distributive Justice.” American Sociological Review45:3–32.
37.
JassoGuillerminaRossiPeter H. 1977. “Distributive Justice and Earned Income.” American Sociological Review42(4):639–51.
38.
JassoGuillerminaTörnblomKjell Y.SabbaghClara. 2016. “Distributive Justice.” Pp. 201–18 in Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research, edited by SabbaghC.SchmittM. New York, NY: Springer.
39.
KallebergArne L.2011. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s–2000s. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
KarasekRobert A.1979. “Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign.” Administrative Science Quarterly24:285–308.
41.
KlineRex B.2016. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed.New York, NY: Guilford.
42.
LadipoDavidWilkinsonFrank. 2002. “More Pressure, Less Protection.” Pp. 8–38. In Job Insecurity and Work Intensification, edited by BurchellB.LadipoD.WilkinsonF. New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
LeventhalGerald S.KaruzaJ.Jr.FryW. R. 1980. “Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences.” Pp. 167–218 in Justice and Social Interaction, edited by MikulaG. New York: Springer–Verlag.
44.
LiebigStefanSauerCarstenFriedhoffStefan. 2015. “Using Factorial Surveys to Study Justice Perceptions: Five Methodological Problems of Attitudinal Justice Research.” Social Justice Research28:415–34.
45.
LiebigStefanSauerCarstenSchuppJürgen. 2012. “The Justice of Earnings in Dual-Earner Households.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility30:219–232.
46.
MajorVirginia S.KleinKatherine J.EhrhartMark G. 2007. “Work Time, Work Interference with Family, and Psychological Distress.” Journal of Applied Psychology87(3):427–36.
47.
NarisadaAtsushi. 2017. “Socioeconomic Status and the Relationship between Under-reward and Distress: Buffering-Resource or Status Disconfirmation?”Social Justice Research30(3):191–220.
48.
NarisadaAtsushiSchiemanScott. 2016. “Underpaid but Satisfied: The Protective Functions of Security.” Work and Occupations43(2):215–55.
49.
PearlinLeonard I.1983. “Role Strains and Personal Stress.” Pp. 3–31 in Psychosocial Stress: Trends in Theory and Research, edited byKaplanH. B. New York, NY: Academic Press.
50.
PearlinLeonard I.1989. “The Sociological Study of Stress.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior30(3):241–56.
51.
PleckJoseph H.1977. “The Work-Family Role System.” Social Problems24:417–27.
52.
RobbinsJordan M.FordMichael T.TetrickLois E. 2012. “Perceived Unfairness and Employee Health: A Meta-analytic Integration.” Journal of Applied Psychology97(2):235–72.
53.
SauerCarstenMayMeike J. 2017. “Determinants of Just Earnings: The Importance of Comparisons with Similar Others and Social Relations with Supervisors and Coworkers in Organizations.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility47:45–54.
54.
SchiemanScott. 2013. “Job-Related Resources and the Pressures of Working Life.” Social Science Research42(2):271–82.
55.
SchiemanScottGlavinPaul. 2016. “The Pressure-Status Nexus and Blurred Work-Family Boundaries.” Work and Occupations43(1):2–27.
56.
SchiemanScottRuppannerLeahMilkieMelissa A. 2018. “Who Helps with Homework? Parenting Inequality and Relationship Quality among Employed Mothers and Fathers.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues39(1):49–65.
57.
SchiemanScottYoungMarisa. 2010. “Are Communications about Work Outside Regular Working Hours Associated with Work-to-Family Conflict, Psychological Distress, and Sleep Problems?”Work and Stress27(3):244–61.
58.
SchunckReinhardSauerCarstenValetPeter. 2015. “Unfair Pay and Health: The Effects of Perceived Injustice of Earnings on Physical Health.” European Sociological Review31(6):655–66.
59.
ShamonHawalDülmerHermann. 2014. “Raising the Question of ‘Who Should Get What?’ Again: On the Importance of Ideal and Existential Standards.” Social Justice Research27:340–68.
60.
SmithTom W.MarsdenPeter V.HoutMichael. 2015. General Social Surveys, 1972–2014: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
61.
SullivanTeresa A.2005. “Greedy Institutions, Overwork, and Work-Life Balance.” Sociological Inquiry84(1):1–15.
62.
ValetPeter. 2018. “Social Structure and the Paradox of the Contented Female Worker: How Occupational Gender Segregation Biases Justice Perceptions of Wages.” Work and Occupations45(2):168–93.
63.
WalsterElaineWalsterG. W.BerscheidEllen. 1978. Equity: Theory and Research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
