Scholars in sociology and social psychology typically represent creativity as an imaginative and deliberate mental activity. Such a perspective has led to a view of creativity as disconnected from the body and the senses as well as from nonanalytic cognition. In this article, we demonstrate that creativity is more grounded in bodily and sensory experience and more reliant on a combination of cognitive processes than has been typically recognized. We use literature on social cognition and embodiment to build our arguments, specifically, the embodied simulation perspective and tripartite process models. We draw from data on elite chefs to show how actors rely on embodied simulations, continually switch between heuristic and analytical thinking, and monitor and control their cognitive processing during the creative process. We outline the implications of this study for the understanding of creativity and extant models of cognition and action more generally.
AmabileTeresa M.1983. “The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45(2):357–76.
2.
AmabileTeresa M.PillemerJulianna. 2012. “Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity.”Journal of Creative Behavior46(1):3–15.
3.
AuyeroJavierSwistunDebora. 2008. “The Social Production of Toxic Uncertainty.”American Sociological Review73(3):357–79.
4.
BarbaletJack. 2011. “Emotions beyond Regulation: Backgrounded Emotions in Science and Trust.”Emotion Review3(1):36–43.
5.
BarsalouLawrence W.1999. “Perceptions of Perceptual Symbols.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences22(4):637–60.
6.
BarsalouLawrence W.2008. “Grounded Cognition.”Annual Review of Psychology59:617–45.
7.
BeatyRoger E.BenedekMathiasSilviaPaul J.SchacterDaniel L. 2016. “Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics.”Trends in Cognitive Sciences20(2):87–95.
8.
BotvinickMatthew M.CohenJonathan D.CarterCameron S. 2004. “Conflict Monitoring and Anterior Cingulate Cortex: An Update.”Trends in Cognitive Sciences8(12):539–46.
9.
BourdieuPierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
BourdieuPierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
11.
BourdieuEmmanuel. 1998. Savoir Faire: Contribution à une Théorie Dispositionnelle de l’Action. Paris: Seuil.
12.
BrekhusWayne H.2015. Culture and Cognition: Patterns in the Social Construction of Reality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
13.
CamicCharles. 1986. “The Matter of Habit.”American Journal of Sociology91(5):1039–87.
14.
CeruloKaren A.2018. “Scents and Sensibility: Olfaction, Sense-Making, and Meaning Attribution.”American Sociological Review83(2):361–89.
15.
ChaikenShelleyTropeYaacov, eds. 1999. Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
16.
ChanJanetBruceJasmineGonsalvesRoanna. 2015. “Seeking and Finding: Creative Processes of 21st Century Painters.”Poetics48:21–41.
17.
ChemeroAnthony. 2011. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
ClarkAndy. 1999. “An Embodied Cognitive Science?”Trends in Cognitive Sciences3(9):345–51.
19.
CollinsRandall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
CollinsRandall. 2009. The Sociology of Philosophies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
CsikszentmihalyiMihaly. 1996. Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperPerennial.
22.
DaltonBenjamin. 2004. “Creativity, Habit, and the Social Products of Creative Action: Revising Joas, Incorporating Bourdieu.”Sociological Theory22(4):603–22.
23.
DanzigerKurt. 1990. Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
DavisGary A.1999. “Barriers to Creativity and Creative Attitudes.” Pp. 165–74 in Encyclopedia of Creativity, edited by RuncoM. A.PritzkerS. R. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
De NeysWim, ed. 2018. Dual Process Theory 2.0. New York: Routledge.
26.
DeweyJohn. [1922] 2002. Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Modern Library.
27.
DietrichArne. 2004. “The Cognitive Neuroscience of Creativity.”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review11(6):1011–26.
28.
DiMaggioPaul. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.”Annual Review of Sociology23(1):263–87.
29.
DurkheimEmile. [1893] 1960. The Division of Labor in Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
30.
ElsbachKimberlyFlynnFrancis. 2013. “Creative Collaboration and the Self-Concept: A Study of Toy Designers.”Journal of Management Studies50(4):515–44.
31.
EvansJonathan S. B.2008. “Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition.”Annual Review of Psychology59:255–78.
32.
EvansJonathan S. B.2009. “How Many Dual-Process Theories do We Need? One, Two, or Many?” Pp. 33–53 in In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond, edited by EvansJ. S. B.FrankishK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
EvansJonathan S. B.StanovichKeith E. 2013. “Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.”Perspectives on Psychological Science8(3):223–41.
34.
FarrellMichael P.2001. Collaborative Circles: Friendship Dynamics and Creative Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
FineGary A.2004. Everyday Genius: Self-Taught Art and the Culture of Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
FinkeRonald A.1995. “Creative Insight and Preinventive Forms.” Pp. 255–80 in The Nature of Insight, edited by SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
FleckLudwik. [1935] 1986. “Scientific Observation and Perception in General.” Pp. 59–78 in Cognition and Fact: Materials on Ludwig Fleck, edited by CohenR. S.SchnelleT. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Pub. Co.
38.
GaboraLianeRanjanApara. 2013. “How Insight Emerges in Distributed, Content-Addressable Memory.” Pp. 19–44 in Neuroscience of Creativity, edited by VartanianO.BristolA. S.KaufmanJ. C. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
GalensonDavid. 2007. Old Masters and Young Geniuses: The Two Life Cycles of Artistic Creativity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
GallagherShaun. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
41.
GalleseVittorioLakoffGeorge. 2005. “The Brain’s Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-Motor System in Conceptual Knowledge.”Cognitive Neuropsychology22(3–4):455–79.
42.
GalleseVittorioWojciehowskiHannah. 2011. “How Stories Make Us Feel: Toward an Embodied Narratology.”California Italian Studies2(1). https://escholarhsip.org/uc/item/3jg726c2.
43.
GardnerHoward. 1993. Creating Minds: An Anatomy of Creativity Seen through the Lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.
44.
GibbsRaymond W.Jr2005. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
GilbertDaniel T.1999. “What the Mind’s Not.” Pp. 3–11 in Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, edited by ChaikenS.TropeY. New York: Guilford Press.
46.
GlăveanuVlad P.2012. “Habitual Creativity: Revising Habit, Reconceptualizing Creativity.”Review of General Psychology16(1):78–92.
47.
GlăveanuVlad P.2014. Distributed Creativity: Thinking outside the Box of the Creative Individual. Cham, Germany: Springer International Publishing.
48.
GlöcknerAndreasWittemanCilia. 2010. “Beyond Dual-Process Models: A Categorisation of Processes Underlying Intuitive Judgement and Decision Making.”Thinking and Reasoning16(1):1–25.
49.
GrossNeil. 2008. Richard Rorty: The Making of an American Philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
HaidtJonathan. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.”Psychological Review108(4):814–34.
52.
Howard-JonesPaul A.2002. “A Dual-State Model of Creative Cognition for Supporting Strategies That Foster Creativity in the Classroom.”International Journal of Technology and Design Education12(3):215–26.
53.
HutchinsEdwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
54.
IgnatowGabriel. 2007. “Theories of Embodied Knowledge: New Directions for Cultural and Cognitive Sociology?”Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour37(2):115–35.
55.
IngoldTim. 2002. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
56.
JoasHans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
JohnsonMark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
JohnsonMark. 2007. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
KantImmanuel. [1798] 1978. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by DowdellV. L. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
60.
KellerAsaf. 2016. Philosophy of Olfactory Perception. Cham, Germany: Palgrave Macmillan.
61.
KellerEvelyn F.1983. A Feeling for the Organism. San Francisco: Freeman.
62.
KoestlerArthur. 1964. The Act of Creation. New York: Macmillan.
63.
KorsmeyerCarolyn. 1999. Making Sense of Taste: Food and Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
64.
KruglanskiArie W.OrehekEdward. 2007. “Partitioning the Domain of Social Inference: Dual Mode and Systems Models and their Alternatives.”Annual Review of Psychology58:291–316.
65.
LakoffGeorgeJohnsonMark. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66.
LakoffGeorgeJohnsonMark. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic books.
67.
LakoffGeorgeNúñezRafael. 2005“The Cognitive Foundations of Mathematics: The Role of Conceptual Metaphor.” Pp. 127–42 in The Handbook of Mathematical Cognition, edited by CampbellJ. I. D. New York: Psychology Press.
68.
LeschzinerVanina. 2015. At the Chef’s Table: Culinary Creativity in Elite Restaurants. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
69.
LeschzinerVaninaGreenAdam I. 2013. “Thinking about Food and Sex: Deliberate Cognition in the Routine Practices of a Field.”Sociological Theory31(2):116–44.
70.
LizardoOmar. 2007. “‘Mirror Neurons,’ Collective Objects and the Problem of Transmission: Reconsidering Stephen Turner’s Critique of Practice Theory.”Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior37(3):319–50.
71.
LizardoOmar. 2017. “Improving Cultural Analysis: Considering Personal Culture in Its Declarative and Nondeclarative Modes.”American Sociological Review82(1):88–115.
72.
LizardoOmarMowryRobertSepulvadoBrandonStoltzDustin S.TaylorMarshall A.Van NessJustinWoodMichael. 2016. “What Are Dual Process Models? Implications for Cultural Analysis in Sociology.”Sociological Theory34(4):287–310.
73.
LizardoOmarStrandMichael. 2010. “Skills, Toolkits, Contexts and Institutions: Clarifying the Relationship between Different Approaches to Cognition in Cultural Sociology.”Poetics38(2):205–28.
74.
MacDonaldAngus W.CohenJonathan D.StengerV. AndrewCarterCameron S. 2000. “Dissociating the Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Cognitive Control.”Science28(5472):1835–38.
75.
MartinJohn L.2010. “Life’s a Beach but You’re an Ant, and Other Unwelcome News for the Sociology of Culture.”Poetics38(2):229–44.
76.
McDonnellTerence E.2014. “Drawing out Culture: Productive Methods to Measure Cognition and Resonance.”Theory and Society43(3–4):247–74.
77.
McLaughlinNeil. 2001. “Optimal Marginality: Innovation and Orthodoxy in Fromm’s Revision of Psychoanalysis.”Sociological Quarterly42(2):271–88.
78.
MeadGeorge H.1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79.
MilesAndrew. 2015. “The (Re)Genesis of Values: Examining the Importance of Values for Action.”American Sociological Review80(4):680–704.
80.
MoeranBrianChristensenBo T., eds. 2013. Exploring Creativity: Evaluative Practices in Innovation, Design, and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81.
MolotchHarvey2004. Where Stuff Comes from: How Toasters, Toilets, Cars, Computers and Many Other Things Come to Be as They Are. New York: Routledge.
82.
MooreRick. 2017. “Fast or Slow: Sociological Implications of Measuring Dual-Process Cognition.”Sociological Science4:196–223.
83.
NijstadBernard A.De DreuCarsten K.RietzschelErik F.BaasMatthijs. 2010. “The Dual Pathway to Creativity Model: Creative Ideation as a Function of Flexibility and Persistence.”European Review of Social Psychology21(1):34–77.
84.
O’ConnorCliodhna. 2017. “Embodiment and the Construction of Social Knowledge: Towards an Integration of Embodiment and Social Representations Theory.”Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour47(1):2–24.
ParkerJohn N.HackettEdward J. 2014. “The Sociology of Science and Emotions.” Pp. 549–72 in Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions. Vol. II, edited by TurnerJ.StetsJ. Dordrecht: Springer.
87.
PaulusPaul B.NijstadBernard A. 2003. Group Creativity: Innovation through Collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
88.
PecherDianeZwaanRolf A., eds. 2005. Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
89.
PetersonRichard A.AnandNarasimhan. 2004. “The Production of Culture Perspective.”Annual Review of Sociology30:311–34.
90.
PringleAndrewSowdenPaul T. 2017. “The Mode Shifting Index (MSI): A New Measure of the Creative Thinking Skill of Shifting between Associative and Analytic Thinking.”Thinking Skills and Creativity23:17–28.
91.
RiversLouisIIICaroleGibbsPaternosterRaymond. 2017. “Integrating Criminological and Decision Research Theory: Implications for Understanding and Addressing Crime in Marginalized Communities.”Deviant Behavior38(1):74–93.
92.
Root-BernsteinRobertRoot-BernsteinMichele. 1999. Sparks of Genius: The Thirteen Thinking Tools of the World’s Most Creative People. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
93.
RuncoMark A.2014. Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
94.
RuncoMark A.ChandIvonne. 1995. “Cognition and Creativity.”Educational Psychology Review7(3):243–67.
95.
SawyerKeith. 2006. Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
96.
SchwarzOri. 2015. “The Sound of Stigmatization: Sonic Habitus, Sonic Styles, and Boundary Work in an Urban Slum.”American Journal of Sociology121(1):205–42.
97.
SennettRichard. 2008. The Craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press.
98.
ShapiroLarry. 2007. “The Embodied Cognition Research Programme.”Philosophy Compass2(2):338–46.
99.
SimontonDean K.1999. Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100.
SimontonDean K.2000. “Creativity: Cognitive, Personal, Developmental, and Social Aspects.”American Psychologist55(1):151–58.
101.
SmithEliot R.DeCosterJamie. 2000. “Dual-Process Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology: Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying Memory Systems.”Personality and Social Psychology Review4(2):108–31.
102.
SmithPamela H.2018. The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
103.
SowdenPaul, T.PringleAndrewGaboraLiane. 2015. “The Shifting Sands of Creative Thinking: Connections to Dual-Process Theory.”Thinking and Reasoning21(1):40–60.
104.
StanovichKeith E.2009. “Distinguishing the Reflective, Algorithmic, and Autonomous Minds: Is it Time for a Tri-Process Theory.” Pp. 55–88 in In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond, edited by EvansJ. S. B.FrankishK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
105.
StanovichKeith. E.2011. Rationality and the Reflective Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
106.
SvenssonHenrikLindblomJessicaZiemkeTom. 2007. “Making Sense of Embodied Cognition: Simulation Theories of Shared Neural Mechanisms for Sensorimotor and Cognitive Processes.” Pp. 241–70 in Body, Language and Mind, Vol. 1: Embodiment, edited by ZiemkeT.ZlatevJ.FrankR. M. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
107.
ThompsonEvan. 2010. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
108.
ThompsonValerie A.2009. “Dual Process Theories: A Metacognitive Perspective.” Pp. 171–95 in In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond, edited by EvansJ. S. B.FrankishK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
109.
VaiseyStephen. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.”American Journal of Sociology114(6):1675–715.
110.
VaiseyStephenFryeMargaret. Forthcoming. “The Old One-Two: Preserving Analytical Dualism in Psychological Sociology.” In Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Sociology, edited by BrekhusW. H.IgnatowG. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
111.
Vila-HenningerLuis A.2015. “Toward Defining the Causal Role of Consciousness: Using Models of Memory and Moral Judgment from Cognitive Neuroscience to Expand the Sociological Dual-Process Model.”Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour45(2):238–60.
112.
WacquantLoïc. 2004. Body and Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
113.
WilsonMargaret. 2002. “Six Views of Embodied Cognition.”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review9(4):625–36.
114.
WinchesterDaniel. 2016. “A Hunger for God: Embodied Metaphor as Cultural Cognition in Action.”Social Forces95(2):585–606.
115.
WuLing-lingBarsalouLawrence W. 2009. “Perceptual Simulation in Conceptual Combination: Evidence from Property Generation.”Acta Psychologica132(2):173–89.
116.
ZerubavelEviatar. 1997. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
117.
ZwaanRolf A.MaddenCarol J. 2005. “Embodied Sentence Comprehension.” Pp. 224–45 in Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking, edited by PecherD.ZwaanR. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
