Several studies have identified inconsistencies between “stated” interpersonal attitudes and those “revealed” after an interaction. The authors used the speed-dating paradigm to examine stated and revealed attitudes in ingroup preferences among Asian American subgroups (Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Filipino Americans). Young single Asian Americans (n = 198) reported preferences for dating different ethnicities and went on speed dates, after which they could offer second dates to their partners. As expected, all four ethnic subgroups showed clear ingroup biases in stated preferences. Ingroup bias in revealed preferences (measured through date offers and ratings of partners’ mate desirability), however, were minimal. At the individual level, stated ingroup preferences did not significantly predict revealed ingroup preferences. In summary, among young Asian Americans, ingroup preferences may not hold in an interactive scenario. The findings suggest that in the presence of personal cues provided through a brief interaction, people may be less prone to make judgments on the basis of ethnicity, even when consequences extend beyond the laboratory. Furthermore, mechanisms for selecting a partner may differ in “hot” (affective) versus “cold” (cognitive) states.
AmbadyNaliniBernieriFrank J.RichesonJennifer A. 2000. “Toward a Histology of Social Behavior: Judgmental Accuracy from Thin Slices of the Behavioral Stream.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology32:201–71.
2.
ArielyDanLoewensteinGeorge. 2006. “The Heat of the Moment: The Effect of Sexual Arousal on Sexual Decision Making.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making19(2):87–98.
3.
AsendorpfJens B.PenkeLarsBackMitja D. 2011. “From Dating to Mating and Relating: Predictors of Initial and Long-term Outcomes of Speed-dating in a Community Sample.” European Journal of Personality25(1):16–30.
4.
BlauPeter Michael. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
5.
BussDavid M.AbbottMaxAngleitnerAloisAsherianArmenBiaggioAngelaBlanco-VillasenorAngelBruchon-SchweitzerM.Ch’uHai-YuanCzapinskiJanuszDeraadBoeleEkehammarBoLohamyNoha ElMarioFioravantiGeorgasJamesGjerdePerGuttmanRuthHazanFatimaIwawakiSaburoJanakiramaiahN.KhosroshaniFatemehKreitlerShulamithLachenichtLanceLeeMargaretLiikKadiLittleBrianMikaStanislawMoadel-ShahidMariamMoaneGeraldineMonteroMaritzaMundy-CastleA. C.NiitToomasNsendulukaEvaristoPienkowskiRyszardPirttilä-BackmanAnna-MaijaDe LeonJulio PonceRousseauJacquesRuncoMark A.SafirMarilyn P.SamuelsCurtisSanitiosoRasyidSerpellRobertSmidNicoSpencerChristopherTadinacMeriTodorovaElka N.TrolandKariVan Den BrandeL.Van HeckGuusVan LangenhoveL.YangKuo-ShuBussDavid M.AbbottMaxAngleitnerAloisAsherianArmenBiaggioAngelaBlanco-VillasenorAngelBruchon-SchweitzerM.Ch’uHai-YuanCzapinskiJanuszDeraadBoeleEkehammarBoLohamyNoha ElFioravantiMarioGeorgasJamesGjerdePerGuttmanRuthHazanFatimaIwawakiSaburoJanakiramaiahN.KhosroshaniFatemehKreitlerShulamithLachenichtLanceLeeMargaretLiikKadiLittleBrianMikaStanislawMoadel-ShahidMariamMoaneGeraldineMonteroMaritzaMundy-CastleA. C.NiitToomasNsendulukaEvaristoPienkowskiRyszardPirttilä-BackmanAnna-MaijaDe LeonJulio PonceRousseauJacquesRuncoMark A.SafirMarilyn P.SamuelsCurtisSanitiosoRasyidSerpellRobertSmidNicoSpencerChristopherTadinacMeriTodorovaElka N.TrolandKariVan Den BrandeL.Van HeckGuusVan LangenhoveL.YangKuo-Shu1990. “International Preferences in Selecting Mates A Study of 37 Cultures.” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology21(1):5–47.
6.
ByrneDonnGriffittWilliam. 1966. “A Developmental Investigation of the Law of Attraction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology4(6):699–702.
7.
ChenChuanshengYoungBrandyGreenbergerEllenEdwardsKari. 2001. “Close Relationships between Asian American and European American College Students.” Journal of Social Psychology141(1):85–100.
8.
DionKaren K.DionKenneth L. 1996. “Cultural Perspectives on Romantic Love.” Personal Relationships3(1):5–17.
9.
EastwickPaul W.FinkelEli J. 2008. “Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Revisited: Do People Know What They Initially Desire in a Romantic Partner?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology94(2):245–64.
10.
EastwickPaul W.LuchiesLaura B.FinkelEli J.HuntLucy L. 2014. “The Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preferences: A Review and Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin140(3):623–65.
11.
EspirituYen. 1993. Asian American Panethnicity: Bridging Institutions and Identities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
12.
FinkelEli J.EastwickPaul W. 2008. “Speed-dating.” Current Directions in Psychological Science17(3):193–97.
13.
FinkelEli J.EastwickPaul W.MatthewsJacob. 2007. “Speed-dating as an Invaluable Tool for Studying Romantic Attraction: A Methodological Primer.” Personal Relationships14(1):149–66.
14.
FioreAndrew T.TaylorLindsay ShawMendelsohnG. A.HearstMarti. 2008. “Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles.” Pp. 797–806 in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’08. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
15.
FiskeSusan T.CuddyAmy J.C.GlickPeterXuJun. 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow From Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82(6): 878-902.
16.
FismanRaymondIyengarSheena S.KamenicaEmirSimonsonItamar. 2008. “Racial Preferences in Dating.” Review of Economic Studies75(1):117–32.
17.
GutnikLily A.HakimzadaA. ForoghYoskowitzNicole A.PatelVimla L. 2006. “The Role of Emotion in Decision-making: A Cognitive Neuroeconomic Approach towards Understanding Sexual Risk Behavior.” Journal of Biomedical Informatics39(6):720–36.
18.
HammondRoss A.AxelrodRobert. 2006. “The Evolution of Ethnocentrism.” Journal of Conflict Resolution50(6):926–36.
19.
HitschGünter J.HortaçsuAliArielyDan. 2005. “What Makes You Click: An Empirical Analysis of Online Dating.” In 2005 Meeting Papers, Vol. 207. Minneapolis, MN: Society for Economic Dynamics.
20.
JoynerKaraKaoGrace. 2005. “Interracial Relationships and the Transition to Adulthood.” American Sociological Review70(4):563–81.
21.
KibriaNazli. 1997. “The Construction of ‘Asian American’: Reflections on Intermarriage and Ethnic Identity among Second-generation Chinese and Korean Americans.” Ethnic and Racial Studies20(3):523–44.
22.
KibriaNazli. 2003. Becoming Asian American: Second-generation Chinese and Korean American Identities. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23.
KimBryan S. K.YangPeggy H.AtkinsonDonald R.WolfeMaren M.HongSehee. 2001. “Cultural Value Similarities and Differences among Asian American Ethnic Groups.” Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology7(4):343–61.
24.
KurzbanRobertToobyJohnCosmidesLeda. 2001. “Can Race Be Erased? Coalitional Computation and Social Categorization.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences98(26):15387–92.
25.
LewisKevin. 2013. “The Limits of Racial Prejudice.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110(47):18814–19.
26.
LiuJames H.CampbellSusan MillerCondieHeather. 1995. “Ethnocentrism in Dating Preferences for an American Sample: The Ingroup Bias in Social Context.” European Journal of Social Psychology25(1):95–115.
LundquistJennifer H.LinKen-Hou. 2015. “Is Love (Color) Blind? The Economy of Race among Gay and Straight Daters.” Social Forces93(4):1423–49.
29.
LuoShanhongZhangGuangjian. 2009. “What Leads to Romantic Attraction: Similarity, Reciprocity, Security, or Beauty? Evidence from a Speed-dating Study.” Journal of Personality77(4):933–64.
30.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27:415–44.
31.
MinPyong GapKimChigon. 2009. “Patterns of Intermarriages and Cross-generational In-marriages among Native-born Asian Americans.” International Migration Review43(3):447–70.
32.
NisbettRichard E.WilsonTimothy D. 1977. “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes.” Psychological Review84(3):231–59.
33.
OkamotoDina G.2007. “Marrying Out: A Boundary Approach to Understanding the Marital Integration of Asian Americans.” Social Science Research36(4):1391–1414.
34.
OkamotoDinaMoraG. Cristina. 2014. “Panethnicity.” Annual Review of Sociology40(1):219–39.
35.
OrbellJohnDawesRobynSchwartz-SheaPeregrine. 1994. “Trust, Social Categories, and Individuals: The Case of Gender.” Motivation and Emotion18(2):109–28.
36.
ParkLora E.YoungAriana F.EastwickPaul W. 2015. “(Psychological) Distance Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Effects of Psychological Distance and Relative Intelligence on Men’s Attraction to Women.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin41(11):1459–73.
37.
PetersEllenVästfjällDanielGärlingTommySlovicPaul. 2006. “Affect and Decision Making: A ‘Hot’ Topic.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making19(2):79–85.
38.
QianZhenchaoBlairSampson LeeRufStacey D. 2001. “Asian American Interracial and Interethnic Marriages: Differences by Education and Nativity.” International Migration Review35(2):557–86.
39.
ReisHarry T.GoslingSamuel D. 2010. “Social Psychological Methods Outside the Laboratory.” Pp. 82–114 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
40.
RidgewayCecilia L.2000. “The Formation of Status Beliefs Improving Status Construction Theory.” Pp. 77–102 in Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 17. Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group.
41.
RidgewayCecilia L.2006. “Linking Social Structure and Interpersonal Behavior: A Theoretical Perspective on Cultural Schemas and Social Relations.” Social Psychology Quarterly69(1):5–16.
42.
RoseStephanie FirebaughFirminMichael W. 2013. “A Qualitative Study of Interracial Dating among College Students.” Revista Internacional de Sociología de la Educación2(1):67–92.
43.
RosenfeldMichael J.2001. “The Salience of Pan-national Hispanic and Asian Identities in US Marriage Markets.” Demography38(2):161–75.
44.
ShinagawaLarry HajimePangGin Yong. 1996. “Asian American Panethnicity and Intermarriage.” Amerasia Journal22(2):127–52.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn C. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” Pp. 33–47 in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by AustinW. G.WorchelS. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
47.
TanisMartinPostmesTom. 2005. “A Social Identity Approach to Trust: Interpersonal Perception, Group Membership and Trusting Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology35(3):413–24.
48.
WangHongyuKaoGraceJoynerKara. 2006. “Stability of Interracial and Intraracial Romantic Relationships among Adolescents.” Social Science Research35(2):435–53.
49.
WhittyMonica T.BuchananTom. 2009. “Looking for Love in So Many Places: Characteristics of Online Daters and Speed Daters.” Interpersona3:63.
50.
WuKarenChenChuanshengGreenbergerEllen. 2015. “The Sweetness of Forbidden Fruit: Interracial Daters Are More Attractive Than Intraracial Daters.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships32(5):650–66.
51.
YanceyGeorge A.YanceySherelyn W. 1997. “Black-white Differences in the Use of Personal Advertisements for Individuals Seeking Interracial Relationships.” Journal of Black Studies27(5):650–67.
