We present a methodological innovation for analyzing archival data that involves the framing strategies from the failed 1980 Iowa Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). First, we conducted an archival analysis that suggested that pro-ERA groups used “frame resonance,” a strategy prominent in the social movement literature where activists align issues with ideologies. Meanwhile, anti-ERA groups used what we coin here as “frame dissonance” by depicting how passing the ERA clashed with ideologies. Next, we used affect control theory (ACT)’s Interact computer program to simulate how constituents likely responded to frames, given the distinct ideologies that existed during the time period. The simulations triangulated the archival analysis by (a) confirming our categorization of framing strategies as either resonance or dissonance and (b) identifying frame dissonance as potentially better for mobilizing than frame resonance. Our study demonstrates the value of Interact for triangulating archival analyses and adds a new framing strategy to the social movement literature.
AlhothaliAreejHoeyJesse. 2015. “Good News or Bad News: Using Affect Control Theory to Analyze Readers Reaction Towards News Articles. ” Paper presented at the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics—Human Language Technologies, Denver, CO.
2.
AmbrasatJensvon ScheveChristianConradMarkusSchauenburgGescheSchröderTobias. 2014. “Consensus and Stratification in the Affective Meaning of Human Sociality.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111:8001–06.
3.
BenfordRobert D.SnowDavid A.2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.”Annual Review of Sociology26:611–39.
4.
BerbrierMitch. 1998. “‘Half the Battle’: Cultural Resonance, Framing Processes, and Ethnic Affectations in Contemporary White Separatist Rhetoric.”Social Problems45:431–50.
5.
BloemraadIreneSilvaFabianaVossKim. 2016. “Rights, Economics, or Family? Frame Resonance, Political Ideology, and the Immigrant Rights Movement.”Social Forces doi: 10.1093/sf/sov123.
6.
BoyleKaitlin M.McKinzieAshleigh E.2015. “Resolving Negative Affect and Restoring Meaning: Responses to Deflection Produced by Unwanted Sexual Experiences.”Social Psychology Quarterly78:151–72.
7.
BrittLoryHeiseDavid R.2000. “From Shame to Pride in Identity Politics.” Pp. 252–68 in Self, Identity, and Social Movements, edited by StrykerS.OwensT. J.WhiteR. W.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
BrownGustav. 2014. “Does Framing Matter? Institutional Constraints on Framing in Two Cases of Intrastate Violence.”Mobilization: An International Quarterly19:143–64.
DenzinNorman K.LincolnYvonna S.2005. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
FerreeMyra Marx. 2003. “Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debates of the United States and Germany.”American Journal of Sociology109:304–44.
12.
FrancisLinda E.1997. “Ideology and Interpersonal Emotion Management: Redefining Identity in Two Support Groups.”Social Psychology Quarterly60:153–71.
13.
GarfinkelHarold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
GoffmanErving. 1956. “Embarrassment and Social Organization.”American Journal of Sociology62:264–71.
15.
GoffmanErving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
HallgrímsdóttirHelga Kristín. 2006. “The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success.”The Sociological Quarterly47:521–42.
17.
HeiseDavid R.2007. Expressive Order: Confirming Sentiments in Social Actions. New York: Springer.
18.
HeiseDavidMacKinnonNeil. 1987. “Affective Bases of Likelihood Perception.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology13:133–51.
19.
JasperJames. 2011. “Emotions and Social Movements: Twenty Years of Theory and Research.”Annual Review of Sociology37:285–303.
20.
KalmanLaura. 2010. Right Star Rising: A New Politics, 1974-1980. New York: Norton.
21.
KroskaAmy. 2000. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Gender Ideology as an Identity.”Gender & Society14:368–94.
22.
KroskaAmyHarknessSarah K.2011. “Coping with the Stigma of Mental Illness: Developing Empirically-Grounded Hypotheses.”Social Forces89:1315–40.
23.
LingJeffreyRiceTom W.2008. “Voting in Iowa’s 1980 and 1992 ERA Referendums.”Women & Politics20:59–72.
24.
LizardoOmarCollettJessica L.2013. “Embarrassment and Social Organization: A Multiple Identities Model.”Social Forces92:353–75.
25.
MansbridgeJane J.1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
McAdamDoug. 1988. Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
McAdamDougBoudetHilary Schaffer. 2012. Putting Social Movements in Their Place: Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000-2005. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
McCaffreyDawnKeysJennifer. 2000. “Competitive Framing Processes in the Abortion Debate: Polarization-Vilification, Frame Saving, and Frame Debunking.”The Sociological Quarterly41:41–61.
29.
McCallGeorge J.2006. “Symbolic Interaction.” Pp. 1–24 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by BurkeP. J.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
McCrightAaron M.DunlapRiley E.2000. “Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement’s Counter-Claims.”Social Problems47:499–522.
31.
MertonRobert K.1972. “Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge.”American Journal of Sociology78:9–47.
32.
MeyerDavid S.StaggenborgSuzanne. 1996. “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.”American Journal of Sociology101:1628–60.
33.
MorrellErica. 2015. “Unpacking Frame Resonance: Professional and Experiential Expertise in Intellectual Property Rights Contention.”Mobilization: An International Quarterly20:361–78.
34.
NelsonSteven M.2006. “Redefining a Bizarre Situation: Relative Concept Stability in Affect Control Theory.”Social Psychology Quarterly69:215–34.
35.
OliverPamela E.JohnstonHank. 2000. “What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research.”Mobilization: An International Quarterly4:37–54.
36.
OsgoodCharles E.MayWilliam H.MironMurray S.1975. Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
37.
RuppLeilaTaylorVerta. 1987. Survival in the Doldrums: The American Women’s Rights Movement, 1945 to the 1960s. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
RymphCatherine E.2006. Republican Women: Feminism and Conservatism From Suffrage Through the Rise of the New Right. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
39.
SchemerChristianWirthWernerMatthesJörg. 2012. “Value Resonance and Value Framing Effects on Voting Intentions in Direct-democratic Campaigns.”American Behavioral Scientist56:334–52.
40.
SchneiderAndreasSchröderTobias. 2012. “Ideal Types of Leadership as Patterns of Affective Meaning: A Cross-Cultural and Over-Time Perspective.”Social Psychology Quarterly75:268–87.
41.
Smith-LovinLynnDouglasWilliam. 1992. “An Affect Control Analysis of Two Religious Subcultures.” Pp. 217–48 in Social Perspective in Emotionsvol. 1, edited by GecasV.FranksD.New York: JAI Press.
42.
Smith-LovinLynnHeiseDavid R.1988. Analyzing Social Interaction: Advances in Affect Control Theory. New York, NY: Gordon & Breach.
43.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert D.1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.”International Social Movement Research1:197–217.
44.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert D.McCammonHolly J.HewittLyndiFitzgeraldScott. 2014. “The Emergence, Development, and Future of the Framing Perspective: 25+ Years Since ‘Frame Alignment.’”Mobilization: An International Quarterly19:23–35.
45.
SouleSarah A.KingBrayden. 2006. “The Stages of the Policy Process and the Equal Rights Amendment, 1972-1982.”American Journal of Sociology111:1871–909.
46.
SouleSarah A.OlzakSusan. 2004. “When Do Movements Matter? The Politics of Contingency and the Equal Rights Amendment.”American Sociological Review69:473–97.
47.
TavoryIddoTimmermansStefan. 2014. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
