People typically respond with negative emotions when they perceive an authority’s outcome distribution to be unjust. We argue, however, that legitimacy of the authority—“what others think” in terms of support coworkers and superiors extend to an individual occupying an authority position—acts as an opposing force, attenuating negative emotions and thus helping to sustain stratified orders. Likewise, legitimacy may stymie intentional displays of felt emotions. Our experiment examines the effects of perceived distributive injustice, legitimacy of the authority, and authority’s procedural fairness on members’ self-reported emotions and likelihood of intended emotional displays toward that authority, a superordinate authority, and coworkers in a work group context. Findings demonstrate that while perceived injustice arouses expected self-reported negative emotions, legitimacy (authorization as support by a superordinate authority and endorsement as support by coworkers) reduces such feelings. Also, strong authorization and endorsement indirectly affect intended emotional displays through self-reported negative emotions.
AdamsJohn S.1965. “Inequity in Social Exchange.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology2:267–99.
2.
BarclayLaurie J.SkarlickiDaniel P.PughS. Douglas. 2005. “Exploring the Role of Emotions in Injustice Perceptions and Retaliation.” Journal of Applied Psychology90:629–43.
3.
Clay-WarnerJody. 2006. “Procedural Justice and Legitimacy: Predicting Negative Emotional Reactions to Workplace Injustice.” Advances in Group Processes23:207–27.
4.
CropanzanoRussellSteinJordan H.NadisicThierry. 2011. Justice and the Experience of Emotion. New York: Routledge.
5.
De CremerDavidvan HielAlain. 2010, “‘Becoming Angry When Another Is Treated Fairly’: On Understanding When Own and Other’s Fair Treatment Influences Negative Reactions.” British Journal of Management21:280–98.
6.
DornbuschSanford M.ScottW. Richard. 1975. Evaluation and the Exercise of Authority. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
EricksonRebecca J.RitterChristian. 2001. “Emotional Labor, Burnout, and Inauthenticity: Does Gender Matter?” Social Psychology Quarterly64:146–63.
8.
FoxSuzySpectorPaul E.MilesDon. 2001. “Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB) in Response to Job Stressors and Organizational Justice: Some Mediator and Moderator Tests for Autonomy and Emotions.” Journal of Vocational Behavior59:291–309.
9.
FoyStevenFreelandRobertMilesAndrewRogersKimberly B.Smith-LovinLynn. 2014. “Emotions and Affect as Source, Outcome and Resistance to Inequality.” Pp. 295–324 in Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality, edited by McLeodJ. D.LawlerE. J.SchwalbeM.New York: Springer.
10.
HegtvedtKaren A.1990. “The Effects of Relationship Structure on Emotional Responses to Inequity.” Social Psychology Quarterly53:214-28.
11.
HegtvedtKaren A.2006. “Justice Frameworks.” Pp. 46–69 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by BurkeP. J.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
HegtvedtKaren A.JohnsonCathryn. 2000. “Justice Beyond the Individual: A Future with Legitimation.” Social Psychology Quarterly63:298–311.
13.
HegtvedtKarenKillianCaitlin. 1999. “Fairness and Emotions: Reactions to the Process and Outcomes of Negotiations.” Social Forces78:269–303.
14.
HegtvedtKaren A.ParrisChristie. 2014. “Emotions in Justice Processes.” Pp. 103–26 in Handbook of Sociology of Emotions, edited by StetsJ.TurnerJ.New York: Springer.
15.
HochschildArlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
HomansGeorge C.1974. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace.
17.
JasperJames M.1998. “The Emotions of Protest: Affective and Reactive Emotions in and around Social Movements.” Sociological Forum13:397–424.
18.
JassoGuillermina. 2006. “Emotion in Justice Processes.” Pp. 321–46 in Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions, edited by StetsJ. E.TurnerJ. H.New York: Springer.
19.
JohnsonCathrynDowdTimothy J.RidgewayCecilia L.2006. “Legitimacy as a Social Process.” Annual Review of Sociology32:53–78.
20.
JohnsonCathrynFordRebeccaKaufmanJoanne M.2000. “Emotional Reactions to Conflict: Do Dependence and Legitimacy Matter?” Social Forces79:107–37.
21.
JostJohn T.KayAaron C.2010. “Social Justice: History, Theory, and Research.” Pp. 1122–65 in Handbook of Social Psychology. 5th ed., edited by FiskeS. T.GilbertD.T.LindzeyG.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
22.
KahnArnoldNelsonRobin E.GaeddertWilliam P.HearnJune L.1982. “The Justice Process: Deciding upon Equity or Equality. Social Psychology Quarterly45:3–8.
23.
KemperTheodore. 1978. A Social Interactional Theory of Emotion. New York: Wiley.
24.
KhanAbdul KarimQuratulainSaminaCrawshawJonathan R.2013. “The Mediating Role of Discrete Emotions in the Relationship between Injustice and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: A Study in Pakistan.” Journal of Business and Psychology28:49–61.
25.
KrehbielPatricia J.CropanzanoRussell. 2000. “Procedural Justice, Outcome Favorability, and Emotion.” Social Justice Research13:339–60.
26.
LeventhalGerald S.KaruzaJurgisJr.FryWilliam Rick. 1980. “Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences.” Pp. 167–218 in Justice and Social Interaction, edited by MikulaG.New York: Springer-Verlag.
27.
LivelyKathryn J.2000. “Reciprocal Emotion Management: Working Together to Maintain Stratification in Private Law Firms.” Work and Occupations27:32–63.
28.
LivelyKathryn J.2008. “Status and Emotional Expression: The Influence of ‘Others’ in Hierarchical Work Settings.” Pp. 287–300 in Social Structure and Emotion, edited by Clay-WarnerJ.RobinsonD. T.Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
29.
LivelyKathryn J.PowellBrian. 2006. “Emotional Expression at Work and at Home: Domain, Status, or Individual Characteristics?” Social Psychology Quarterly69:17–38.
30.
LivelyKathryn J.WeedEmi A.2014. “Emotion Management: Sociological Insight into What, How, Why, and to What End?” Emotion Review6:202–207.
31.
MarkovskyBarry. 1985. “Toward a Multilevel Distributive Justice Theory.” American Sociological Review50:822–39.
32.
MilesJeremyShevlinMark. 2001. Applying Regression & Correlation: A Guide for Students and Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
MurphyKristina. 2009. “Procedural Justice and Affect Intensity: Understanding Reactions to Regulatory Authorities.” Social Justice Research22:1–30.
34.
O’BrienRobert M.2007. “A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors.” Quality and Quantity41:673–90.
35.
SchiemanScott. 2006. “Anger.” Pp. 493–515 in Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions, edited by StetsJ. E.TurnerJ. H.New York: Springer.
36.
SchwalbeMichaelShayHeather. 2014. “Dramaturgy and Dominance.” Pp. 155–81 in Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality, edited by McLeodJ. D.LawlerE. J.SchwalbeM.New York: Springer.
37.
SkarlickiDaniel P.KulikCarol T.2005. “Third-Party Reactions to Employee (Mis)treatment: A Justice Perspective.” Research in Organizational Behavior26:183–229.
38.
StecherMary D.RosseJoseph G.2005. “The Distributive Side of Interactional Justice: The Effects of Interpersonal Treatment on Emotional Arousal.” Journal of Managerial Issues17:229–46.
39.
ThoitsPeggy A.1989. “The Sociology of Emotions.” Annual Review of Sociology61:837–57.
40.
TurnerJonathan H.StetsJan E.2005. The Sociology of Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
TylerTom R.2001. “A Psychological Perspective on the Legitimacy of Institutions and Authorities.” Pp. 416–36 in The Psychology of Legitimacy, edited by JostJ. T.MajorB.New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
TylerTom R.2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology57:375–400.
43.
TylerTom R.BoeckmannRobert J.SmithHeather J.HuoYuen J.1997. Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Boulder, CO: Westview.
44.
TylerTom R.LindE. Allan. 1992. “A Relational Model of Authority in Groups.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology25:115–91.
45.
van den BosKees. 2005. “What Is Responsible for the Fair Process Effect?” Pp. 273–300 in Handbook of Organizational Justice, edited by GreenbergJ.ColquittJ. A.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46.
van den BosKeesLindE. AllanVermuntRielWilkeHenk A. M.1997. “How Do I Judge My Outcome When I Do Not Know the Outcome of Others? The Psychology of the Fair Process Effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72:1034–46.
47.
WalkerHenry A.2014. “Legitimacy and Inequality.” Pp. 353–77 in Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality, edited by McLeodJ. D.LawlerE. J.SchwalbeM.New York: Springer.
48.
WalkerHenry A.ZelditchMorrisJr.1993. “Power, Legitimacy, and the Stability of Authority: A Theoretical Research Program.” Pp. 364–81 in Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory, edited by BergerJ.ZelditchM.Jr.Stanford University Press.
49.
WalsterElaineWalsterG. WilliamBerscheidEllen. 1978. Equity: Theory and Research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
50.
WeberMax. [1924] 1978. Economy and Society. Vols. I and II. Edited by RothG.WittichC.CA: University of California Press, Berkeley.
51.
WhartonAmy S.2014. “Work and Emotions.” Pp. 335–58 in Handbook of Sociology of Emotions, edited by StetsJ.TurnerJ.New York: Springer.
52.
WingfieldAdia Harvey. 2010. “Are Some Emotions Marked ‘White Only’? Racialized Feeling Rules in Professional Workplaces.” Social Problems57:251–68.
53.
ZelditchMorrisJr.2001. “Processes of Legitimation: Recent Developments and New Directions.” Social Psychology Quarterly64:4–17.
54.
ZelditchMorrisJr.2006. “Legitimacy Theory.” Pp. 324–52 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by BurkeP. J.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55.
ZelditchMorrisJr.WalkerHenry A.1984. “Legitimacy and the Stability of Authority.” Advances in Group Processes1:1–25.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
