Although at first relatively disinterested in race, modern genomic research has increasingly turned attention to racial variations. We examine a prominent example of this focus—direct-to-consumer racial admixture tests—and ask how information about the methods and results of these tests in news media may affect beliefs in racial differences. The reification hypothesis proposes that by emphasizing a genetic basis for race, thereby reifying race as a biological reality, the tests increase beliefs that whites and blacks are essentially different. The challenge hypothesis suggests that by describing differences between racial groups as continua rather than sharp demarcations, the results produced by admixture tests break down racial categories and reduce beliefs in racial differences. A nationally representative survey experiment (N = 526) provided clear support for the reification hypothesis. The results suggest that an unintended consequence of the genomic revolution may be to reinvigorate age-old beliefs in essential racial differences.
BastianB.HaslamN.2006. “Psychological Essentialism and Stereotype Endorsement.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology42:228–35.
5.
BolnickDeborah A.FullwileyDuanaDusterTroyCooperRichard S.FujimuraJoan H.KahnJonathanKaufmanJay S.MarksJonathanMorningAnnNelsonAlondraOssorioPilarReardonJennyReverbySusan M.TallBearKimberly. 2007 “The Science and Business of Genetic Ancestry Testing.” Science318:399–400.
6.
BrewerMarilynn B.BrownRupert J.1998. “Intergroup Relations.” Pp. 554–94 in The Handbook of Social Psychology. 4th ed., Vol. 2, edited by GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG.New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
CohenJacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
CollinsFrancis. 2001. “Introductory Remarks.” Presented at A Decade of ELSI Research,” January 16–18, Bethesda, MD.
9.
ConditCeleste M.BatesB.2005. “How Lay People Respond to Messages about Genetics, Health and Race.” Clinical Genetics68:97–105.
10.
ConditCeleste M.ParrottR. L.BatesB. R.BeyanJ.AchterP. J.2004. “Exploration of the Impact of Messages about Genes and Race on Lay Attitudes.” Clinical Genetics66:402–408.
11.
DalyEmma. 2005. “DNA Tells Students They Aren’t Who They Thought.” New York Times, April13, Section B, Column 3, p. 8.
12.
DeBellMatthewKrosnickJon A.LupiaArthur. 2010. Methodology Report and User’s Guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study. Palo Alto, CA, and Ann Arbor, MI: Stanford University and the University of Michigan.
13.
DusterTroy. 2003. Backdoor to Eugenics. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
14.
DusterTroy. 2006. “The Molecular Reinscription of Race: Unanticipated Issues in Biotechnology and Forensic Science.” Patterns of Prejudice40:427–41.
15.
FanonFrantz. 1967. Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press.
16.
FeaginJoe. 2001. Racist America: Roots, Current Realities, and Future Reparations. New York: Routledge.
17.
FiskeSusan T.TaylorS. E.2008. Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. New York: McGraw Hill.
18.
FujimuraJoan H.DusterTroyRajagopalanRamya. 2009. “Introduction: Race, Genetics, and Disease: Questions of Evidence, Matters of Consequence,”Social Studies of Science38:643–56.
19.
FullwileyDuana. 2007. “The Molecularization of Race: Institutionalizing Human Difference in Pharmacogenetics Practice.” Science as Culture16:1–30.
20.
GatesHenry Louis. 2010. “Faces of America.” Public Broadcasting System.
21.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K.1998. “Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74:1464–80.
22.
HenigRobin M.2004. “The Genome in Black and White (and Gray).” New York Times, October10, Section 6, Column 1, p. 47.
23.
HoffmanCurtHurstNancy. 1990. “Gender Stereotypes: Perception or Rationalization?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58:197–208.
24.
The International HapMap Consortium. 2003. “The International HapMap Project.” Nature426:789–96.
25.
KellerJ.2005. “In Genes We Trust: The Biological Component of Psychological Essentialism and Its Relationship to Mechanisms of Motivated Social Cognition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88:686–702.
26.
KluegelJames R.1990. “Trends in Whites’ Explanations of the Black-White Gap in Socioeconomic Status, 1977–1989.” American Sociological Review55:512–25.
27.
LeroiArmand M.2005. “A Family Tree in Every Gene.” New York Times, March14, Section A, Column 1, p. 21.
Office of International information Programs, U.S. Department of State. 2000. Transcript: White House Briefing on Genome Map. Retrieved June26, 2014 (http://usinfo.state.gov).
37.
OliverMelvin L.ShapiroThomas M.2006. Black Wealth/White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality, Tenth Anniversary Edition. New York: Routledge.
38.
OmiMichaelWinantHoward. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
39.
PayneB. KeithChengClara MichelleGovorunAliceStewartBrandon D.2005. “An Inkblot for Attitudes: Affect Misattribution as Implicit Measurement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89:277–93.
PhelanJo C.LinkBruce G.FeldmanNaumi M.2013. “The Genomic Revolution and Beliefs about Essential Racial Differences: A Backdoor to Eugenics?”American Sociological Review78:167–91.
42.
RothbartM.TaylorM.1992. “Category Labels and Social Reality: Do We View Social Categories as Natural Kinds?” Pp. 13–36 in Language, Interaction and Social Cognition, edited by SeminG. R.FiedlerK.London: Sage.
43.
RoyalCharmaine D.NovembreJohnFullertonStephanie M.GoldsteinDavid B.LongJeffrey C.BarnshadMichael J.ClarkAndrew G.2010. “Inferring Genetic Ancestry: Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications.” American Journal of Human Genetics86:661–73.
44.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C.1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” Pp. 7–24 in Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by WorchelS.AustinW. G.Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
45.
TellesE. E.2004. Race in Another America: The Significance of Skin Color in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
WadeNicholas. 2002. “For Sale: A DNA Test to Measure Racial Mix.” New York Times, October1, 2002, Section F, Column 5, p. 4.
47.
WadeNicholas. 2004. “Articles Highlight Different Views on Genetic Basis of Race.” New York Times, October27, Section A, Column 1, p. 13.
48.
WilliamsMelissa J.EberhardtJennifer L.2008. “Biological Conceptions of Race and the Motivation to Cross Racial Boundaries.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology94:1033–47.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
