Are cohabiting couples more likely than married couples to break up in response to perceptions that their relationship is not fair? Based on social psychological perspectives on intimate relationship stability, in addition to empirical research contrasting cohabitation with marriage, I hypothesize that cohabiting couples will be more likely than married couples to separate in response to perceived breaches of justice. To test this hypothesis and others, I examine the influence of both male and female partners' perceptions of fairness on the stability of married and cohabiting couples using two waves of couple-level data from the National Survey of Families and Households. The results of Cox proportional hazards models suggest that cohabiting couples, but not married couples, are increasingly likely to separate as levels of male or female underbenefiting increase. The conclusion discusses the implications of these findings for social psychological perspectives and future studies on the role of distributive justice in the stability of intimate relationships.
BlauPeter M.1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life.New York: Wiley.
3.
BlumsteinPhilipSchwartzPepper1983. American Couples.New York: William Morrow and Company.
4.
BrinesJulieJoynerKara1999. “The Ties that Bind: Principles of Cohesion in Cohabitation and Marriage.”American Sociological Review64: 333–56.
5.
BrownSusan L.BoothAlan1996. “Cohabitation versus Marriage: A Comparison of Marital Quality.”Journal of Marriage and the Family58: 668–78.
6.
BrownSusan L.2000. “Union Transitions Among Cohabitors: The Significance of Relationship Assessments and Expectations.”Journal of Marriage and the Family62: 833–46.
7.
BrownSusan L.2003. “Relationship Quality Dynamics of Cohabiting Unions.”Journal of Family Issues24: 583–601.
8.
BumpassLarryLu.Hsien-Hen2000. “Trends in Cohabitation and Implications for Children's Family Contexts in the United States.”Population Studies54: 29–41.
9.
BumpassLarrySweetJames A.1989. “National Estimates of Cohabitation.”Demography26: 615–625.
10.
BumpassLarrySweetJames A.CherlinAndrew1991. “The Role of Cohabitation in Declining Rates of Marriage.”Journal of Marriage and the Family53: 913–27.
11.
BuunkBram P.SchaufeliWilmar B.1999. “Reciprocity in Interpersonal Relationships: An Evolutionary Perspective on Its Importance for Health and Well-Being.”European Review of Social Psychology10: 259–91.
12.
CasperLynnBianchiSuzanne2002. Continuity and Change in the American Family.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
CiabattariTeresa2004. “Cohabitation and Housework: The Effects of Marital Intentions.”Journal of Marriage and Family66: 118–25.
15.
CherlinAndrew2000. “Toward a New Socioeconomics of Union Formation.” Pp. 126–43 in The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, edited byWaiteL.. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
16.
ClarkbergMarinStolzenbergRoss M.WaiteLinda J.1995. “Attitudes, Values, and Entrance into Cohabitational versus Marital Unions.”Social Forces74: 609–34.
17.
Clay-WarnerJodyHegtvedtKaren A.RomanPaul2005. “Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice: How Experiences with Downsizing Condition Their Impact on Organizational Commitment.”Social Psychology Quarterly65 (1): 89–102.
18.
CookKaren S.HegtvedtKaren A.1983. “Distributive Justice, Equity, and Equality.”Annual Review of Sociology9: 217–41.
DeMarisAlfred2007. “The Role of Relationship Inequity in Marital Disruption.”Journal of Personal and Social Relationships24 (2): 177–95.
21.
DeMarisAlfredLongmoreMonica A.1996. “Ideology, Power, and Equity: Testing Competing Explanations for the Perception of Fairness in Household Labor.”Social Forces74: 1043–71.
22.
FelmleeDianeSprecherSusanBassinEdward1990. “The Dissolution of Intimate Relationships: a Hazard Model.”Social Psychology Quarterly53: 13–30.
23.
FriscoMichelle L.WilliamsKristi2003. “Perceived Housework Equity, Marital Happiness, and Divorce in Dual-Earner Households.”Journal of Family Issues24: 51–73.
24.
GagerConstance T.SanchezLaura2003. “Two as One? Couples Perceptions of Time Spent Together, Marital Quality, and the Risk of Divorce.”Journal of Family Issues24: 21–50.
25.
GlassJenniferFujimotoTetsushi1994. “Housework, Paid Work, and Depression Among Husbands and Wives.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior35: 179–91.
26.
GreensteinTheodore N.1996. “Gender Ideology and Perceptions of the Fairness of the Division of Household Labor: Effects on Marital Quality.”Social Forces74: 1029–42.
27.
GroteNancy K.ClarkMargaret S.2001. “Perceiving Unfairness in the Family Cause or Consequence of Martial Distress?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology80: 281–293.
28.
HatfieldElaineUtneMaryTraupmannJane1979. “Equity Theory and Intimate Relationships.” Pp. 99–133 in Social Exchange in Developing Relationships, edited byBurgessL.HustonT.L.. New York: Academic Press.
29.
HochschildArlieMachungAnne1989. The Second Shift.New York: Avon Books.
30.
HomansGeorge C.1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms.New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
31.
JassoGuillermina1980. “A New Theory of Distributive Justice.”American Sociological Review45: 3–32.
32.
JassoGuillermina1988. “Employment, Earnings, and Marital Cohesiveness: An Empirical Test of Theoretical Predictions.” Pp. 123–62 in Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, edited byWebsterM.FoschiM.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
JonesDavid A.SkarlickiDaniel P.2003. “The Relationship between Perceptions of Fairness and Voluntary Turnover among Retail Employees.”Journal of Applied Social Psychology33 (6): 1226–43.
34.
KalmijnMatthijsLoeveAnnekeMantingDorien2007. “Income Dynamics in Couples and the Dissolution of Marriage and Cohabitation.”Demography44: 159–79.
35.
KuijerRosline G.BuunkBram P.YbemaJan F.2001. “Are Equity Concerns Important in the Intimate Relationship When One Partner of a Couple Has Cancer?”Social Psychology Quarterly64: 267–82.
36.
LongmoreMonica A.DeMarisAlfred1997. “Perceived Inequity and Depression in Intimate Relationships: The Moderating Effect of Selfesteem.”Social Psychology Quarterly60: 172–84.
37.
MillsJudsonClarkMargaret S.1994. “Communal and Exchange Relationships: Controversies and Research.” Pp. 29–42 in Theoretical Frameworks for Personal Relationships, edited byErberR.GilmourR.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38.
MolmLinda1991. “Affect and Social Exchange: Satisfaction in Power-Dependence Relations.”American Sociological Review56: 475–93.
39.
MursteinBernard I.CerretoMaryMacDonaldMarcia G.1977. “A Theory and Investigation of the Effect of Exchange Orientation on Marriage and Friendship.”Journal of Marriage and the Family39: 543–48.
40.
NockSteven L.1995. “A Comparison of Marriages and Cohabiting Relationships.”Journal of Family Issues16: 53–76.
41.
RandallChristina S.MuellerCharles W.1995. “Extensions of Justice Theory: Justice Evaluations and Employee's Reactions in a Natural Setting.”Social Psychology Quarterly58 (3): 178–94.
42.
SanchezLaura1994. “Gender, Labor Allocations, and the Psychology of Entitlement within the Home.”Social Forces73: 533–53.
43.
SanchezLauraKaneEmily W.1996. “Women's and Men's Constructions of Perceptions of Housework Fairness.”Journal of Family Issues17: 358–87.
44.
SanchezLauraManningWendy D.SmockPamela J.1998. “Sex-Specialized or Collaborative Mate Selection? Union Transitions among Cohabitors.”Social Science Research27: 280–304.
45.
SasslerSharonGoldscheiderFrancis2004. “Revisiting Jane Austen's Theory of Marriage Timing.”Journal of Family Issues25 (2): 139–66.
46.
SasslerSharonMillerAmanda2007. “Waiting to Be Asked: Relationship Progression among Cohabiting Couples.” Working paper.
47.
SmithHerbert L.GagerConstance T.MorganS. Philip1998. “Identifying Underlying Dimensions in Spouses' Evaluations of Fairness in the Division of Household Labor.”Social Science Research27: 305–27.
48.
SmockPamela J.2000. “Cohabitation in The United States: An Appraisal of Research Themes, Findings, and Implications.”Annual Review of Sociology.26: 1–20.
49.
SmockPamela J.HuangPenelopeBergstromCaraManningWendy2007. “Heterosexual Cohabitation in the United States: Motives for Living Together among Young Men and Women.” Working paper.
50.
SmockPamela J.ManningWendy D.1997. “Cohabiting Partners' Economic Circumstances and Marriage.”Demography24: 331–41.
51.
SprecherSusan1986. “The Relation between Inequity and Emotions in Close Relationships.”Social Psychology Quarterly49: 309–21.
52.
SprecherSusan1992. “How Men and Women Expect to Feel and Behave in Response to Inequity in Close Relationships.”Social Psychology Quarterly55: 57–69.
53.
SprecherSusan1998. “The Effect of Exchange Orientation on Close Relationships.”Social Psychology Quarterly61: 220–31.
54.
SprecherSusan2001. “Equity and Social Exchange in Dating Couples: Associations with Satisfaction, Commitment, and Stability.”Journal of Marriage and Family63: 599–613.
55.
SweetJamesBumpassLarryCallVaughn1988. “The Design and Content of the National Survey of Households and Families.”Madison, WI: Univ. of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology.
56.
ThibautJohnKelleyHarold1959. The Social Psychology of Groups.New York: Wiley.
57.
ThorntonArlandAxinnWilliam G.HillDaniel H.1992. “Reciprocal Effects of Religiosity, Cohabitation, and Marriage.”American Journal of Sociology98: 628–51.
58.
UdryJ. Richard1981. “Marital Alternatives and Marital Disruption.”Journal of Marriage and the Family43: 889–97.
59.
VaughanDiane1986. Uncoupling: Turning Points in Intimate Relationships.New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
WalsterElaineWalsterG. WilliamBerscheidEllen1978. Equity: Theory and Research.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
