BlountSallyBazermanMax H.1996. “The Inconsistent Evaluation of Absolute versus Comparative Payoffs in Labor Supply and Bargaining.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization30: 227–240.
2.
BrandtJordiCharnessGary2000. “Hot vs. Cold: Sequential Responses and Preference Stability in Experimental Games.”Experimental Economics2: 227–238.
3.
BrosigJeannetteWeimannJoachimYangChun-Lei2001. “The Hot versus Cold Effect in a Simple Bargaining Experiment.”Journal of Experimental Economics6: 75–90.
4.
EckelCatherine2007. “Economic Games for Social Scientists.” Pp. 497–516 in Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences edited byWebsterMurrayJr.SellJane. Elsevier: New York.
5.
FalkAminFehrErnstFischbacherUrs2003. “On the Nature of Fair Behavior.”Economic Inquiry41: 20–26.
6.
GüthWernerHuckSteffenMüllerWieland2001. “The Relevance of Equal Splits in Ultimatum Games.”Games and Economic Behavior37: 161–169.
7.
HertwigRalphOrtmannAndreas2001. “Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological Challenge for Psychologists?”Behavioral and Brain Sciences24: 383–451.
8.
HoritaYutaka2008. “Motivational Bases of Rejection Choice in the Ultimatum and Related Games: Inequity Aversion, Reciprocity, and Identity.” Master's Thesis submitted to the Department of Behavioral Science, Hokkaido University, Japan.
9.
HoritaYutakaYamagishiToshio2007a. “Reciprocity and Identity Protection: Reasons for Rejection in the Ultimatum Game.”The Japanese Journal of Psychology78: 446–51.
10.
HoritaYutakaYamagishiToshio2007b. “Rejection of Unintentionally Unfair Offers in an Ultimatum Game.”Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meetings of the Japanese Group Dynamics Association:58–59.
11.
MilgramStanley1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. Harper/Collins.
12.
OhiraHideki1989. “Effects of Mitigating Information on Arousal and Retaliatory Aggression.Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology28: 95–104.
13.
OosterbeekHesselSloofRandolphvan de KuilenGus2004. “Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-analysis.Experimental Economics7: 171–188.
14.
TakagishiHarutoTakahashiNobuyukiYamagishiToshio In press. “The Role of Intentions in Third-party Punishment.”Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology..
15.
TakahashiNobuyukiMashimaRie2005. “Does Intention Matter in Third-party Punishment?”Paper presented at the 17th Annual Meetings of Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Austin, TX. June 1-5.
16.
WilsonRick K.IsaacR. Mark2007. “Political Economy and Experiments.” Pp 1, 4–7 in The Political Economist: Newsletter of the Section on Political Economy, edited byBernhardWilliamBrozJ. Lawrence. American Political Science Association. Volume XIV, Issue 1 (Winter).