Within the general framework of agreement on a state of affairs, the matter of the terms of agreement can remain: determining whose view is the more significant or more authoritative with respect to the matter at hand. In this paper we focus on this issue as it is played out in assessment sequences. We examine four practices through which a second speaker can index the independence of an agreeing assessment from that of a first speaker, and in this way can qualify the agreement. We argue that these practices reduce the responsiveness of the second assessment to the first; in this way they resist any claim to epistemic authority that may be indexed by the first speaker in “going first” in assessing some state of affairs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottAndrew1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor.Chicago: University of Chicago Press
2.
AlcoholicsAnonymous2001. Alcoholics Anonymous, 4th ed.New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.
3.
BerlinIsaiah2002. Four Essays on Liberty.Oxford: Oxford University Press
4.
BernsteinBasil1971. Class, Codes and Control, Vol.1. London: Routledge
5.
BrownPenelopeStephenLevinson1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
6.
ChafeWallaceJohannaNichols, eds. 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology.Norwood, NJ: Ablex
7.
DrewPaul1991. “Asymmetries of Knowledge in Conversational Interactions.” Pp. 29–48 in Asymmetries in Dialogue, edited byMarkovaIvanaKlausFoppaHemel Hempstead UK: Harvester
8.
DrewPaul1997. “‘Open’ Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Trouble in Conversation.”Journal of Pragmatics28: 69101
9.
DrewPaulJohnHeritage1992. “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” Pp. 3–65 in Talk at Work, edited byDrewPaulJohnHeritageCambridge UK: Cambridge University Press
10.
DurkheimEmile1915. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life.London: Allen and Unwin
11.
GillVirginia1998. “Doing Attributions in Medical Interaction: Patients' Explanations for Illness and Doctors' Responses.”Social Psychology Quarterly61: 34260
12.
GillVirginiaDouglasMaynard Forthcoming. “Explaining Illness: Patients' Proposals and Physicians' Responses.” In Practicing Medicine: Structure and Process in Primary Care Consultations, edited byHeritageJohnDouglasMaynardCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
13.
GoffmanErving1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face to Face Behavior.Garden City, NY: Doubleday
14.
GoffmanErving1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order.New York: Harper and Row
15.
GoffmanErving1983. “Felicity's Condition.”American Journal of Sociology89: 153
16.
HeritageJohn1984a. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology.Cambridge, UK: Polity
17.
HeritageJohn1984b. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” Pp. 299–345 in Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited byAtkinsonJ. MaxwellJohnHeritageCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
18.
HeritageJohn1998. “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.Language in Society27: 291334
19.
HeritageJohn2002a. “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” Pp. 196–224 in The Language of Turn and Sequence, edited byCeciliaFordBarbaraFoxSandraThompsonOxford, UK: Oxford University Press
20.
HeritageJohn2002b. “The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.”Journal of Pragmatics34: 1427–46,
21.
HeritageJohnAnnaLindström1998. “Motherhood, Medicine and Morality: Scenes from a Medical Encounter.Research on Language and Social Interaction31: 397438
22.
HeritageJohnJeffreyRobinson Forthcoming. “Accounting for the Visit: Giving Reasons for Seeking Medical Care.” In Practicing Medicine: Structure and Process in Primary Care Consultations, edited byHeritageJohnDouglasMaynardCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
23.
HoltgravesThomas1992. “Linguistic Realization of Face Management: Implications for Language Production and Comprehension, Person Perception, and Cross-Cultural Communication.”Social Psychology Quarterly55: 14159
24.
JeffersonGail2002. “Is ‘No’ an Acknowledgment Token? Comparing American and British Uses of (+)/(-) Tokens.”Journal of Pragmatics34: 134583
25.
KamioAkio1997. Territory of Information.Philadelphia: John Benjamins
26.
KollockPeterPhilipBlumsteinPepperSchwartz1985. “Sex and Power in Interaction: Conversational Privileges and Duties.American Sociological Review50: 2446
27.
LabovWilliamDavidFanshel1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation.New York: Academic Press
28.
LakoffRobin1975. Language and Women's Place.New York: Harper
29.
LernerGene1996. “‘Finding Face’ in the Preference Structures of Talk-in-Interaction.”Social Psychology Quarterly59: 30321
30.
MaynardDouglas W.DonZimmerman1984. “Topical Talk, Ritual, and the Social Organization of Relationships.”Social Psychology Quarterly47: 30116
31.
O'BarrWilliam N.AtkinsBowman K.1980. “‘Women’s Langauge' or `Powerless Language.”' Pp. 93–110 in Women and Language in Literature and Society, edited bySallyMcConnell-GinetRuthBorkerNellyFurmanNew York: Praeger
32.
PomerantzAnita1978. “Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-Operation of Multiple Constraints.” Pp. 79–112 in Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, edited byJimSchenkeinNew York: Academic Press:
33.
PomerantzAnita1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing With Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” Pp. 57–101 in Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited byAtkinsonJ. MaxwellJohnHeritageCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
34.
RaymondGeoffrey2000. “The Voice of Authority: The Local Accomplishment of Authoritative Discourse in Live News Broadcasts.”Discourse Studies2: 35479
35.
RaymondGeoffrey2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Type Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.”American Sociological Review, 68: 939–67
36.
RaymondGeoffrey2004. “Prompting Action: The Stand-Alone “So” in Ordinary Conversation.”Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37: 185–218
37.
RothAndrew2002. “Social Epistemology in Broadcast News Interviews.Language in Society31: 35581
38.
SacksHarvey1984. “On Doing `Being Ordinary.”' Pp. 413–29 in Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited byAtkinsonJ. MaxwellJohnHeritageCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
39.
SacksHarvey1987. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” Pp. 54–69 in Talk and Social Organisation, edited byButtonGrahamLeeJohn R. E.Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters
40.
SchegloffEmanuel A.1988. “On an Actual Virtual Servo-Mechanism for Guessing Bad News: A Single Case Conjecture.”Social Problems35: 44257
41.
SchegloffEmanuel A.1992. “Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided for Place for the Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.”American Journal of Sociology95: 12951345
42.
SchegloffEmanuel A.1993. “Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation.”Research on Language and Social Interaction26: 99128
43.
SchegloffEmanuel A.1996a. “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.”American Journal of Sociology104: 161216
44.
SchegloffEmanuel A.1996b. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” Pp. 52–133 in Interaction and Grammar, edited byElinorOchsThompsonSandraEmanuelSchegloffCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
45.
SchegloffEmanuel A.1996c. “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics.” Pp. 437–85 in Studies in Anaphora, edited byBarbaraFoxAmsterdam: John Benjamins
46.
SchegloffEmanuel A. Forthcoming. A Primer of Conversation Analysis: Sequence Organization.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
47.
SchegloffEmanuel A.GailJeffersonHarveySacks1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.”Language53: 36182
48.
StiversTanya Forthcoming. “Modified Repeats and Claiming Authority from Second Position.”Research on Language and Social Interaction.
49.
WhalenMarilynDonZimmerman1990. “Describing Trouble: Practical Epistemology in Citizen Calls to the Police.”Language in Society19: 46592
