Rumor discourse has been conceptualized as an attempt to reduce anxiety and uncertainty via a process of social sensemaking. Fourteen rumors transmitted on various Internet discussion groups were observed and content analyzed over the life of each rumor. With this (previously unavailable) more ecologically robust methodology, the intertwined threads of sensemaking and the gaining of interpretive control are clearly evident in the tapestry of rumor discourse. We propose a categorization of statements (the Rumor Interaction Analysis System) and find differences between dread rumors and wish rumors in anxiety-related content categories. Cluster analysis of these statements reveals a typology of voices (“communicative postures”) exhibiting sensemaking activities of the rumor discussion group, such as hypothesizing, skeptical critique, directing of activities to gain information, and presentation of evidence. These findings enrich our understanding of the long-implicated sensemaking function of rumor by clarifying the elements of communication that operate in rumor's social context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportGordon W.PostmanLeo J.1947. The Psychology of Rumor.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2.
AnderbergMichael R.1973. Cluster Analysis for Applications.New York: Academic Press.
3.
AnthonySusan1973. “Anxiety and Rumor.”Journal of Social Psychology89: 91–98.
4.
BartlettFrederic C.1920. “Some Experiments on the Reproduction of Folk-Stories.”Folk-Lore31: 30–47.
5.
BartlettFrederic C.1932. Remembering.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BealsDianne E.1992. “Computer Networks As a New Data Base.”Journal of Educational Computing Research8: 327–45.
7.
BordiaPrashant1996. “Studying Verbal Interaction on the Internet: The Case of Rumor Transmission Research.”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers28 (2): 149–51.
8.
BordiaPrashant1997. “Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature.”Journal of Business Communication34 (1): 99–116.
9.
BordiaPrashantRosnowRalph L.1998. “Rumor Rest Stops on the Information Highway: Transmission Patterns in a Computer-Mediated Rumor Chain.”Human Communication Research25 (2): 163–79.
10.
BucknerH. Taylor1965. “A Theory of Rumor Transmission.”Public Opinion Quarterly29: 54–70.
11.
CaplowTheodore1947. “Rumors in War.”Social Forces25: 298–302.
12.
DiekhoffGeorge1992. Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Univariate, Bivariate, Multivariate.Dubuque: Brown.
13.
DiFonzoNicholasBordiaPrashant1997. “Rumor and Prediction: Making Sense (but Losing Dollars) on the Stock Market.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes71: 329–53.
14.
DiFonzoNicholasBordiaPrashant1998. “A Tale of Two Corporations: Managing Uncertainty During Organizational Change.”Human Resource Management37: 295–303.
15.
DiFonzoNicholasBordiaPrashant2000. “How Top PR Professionals Handle Hearsay: Corporate Rumors, Their Effects, and Strategies to Manage Them.”Public Relations Review26: 173–90.
16.
DiFonzoNicholasBordiaPrashantRosnowRalph L.1994. “Reining In Rumors.”Organizational Dynamics23: 47–62.
17.
EklundhKerstin S.1986. Dialogue Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Study of Letters in the COM System.Linkoping, Sweden: Liber.
18.
FestingerLeonCartwrightDorwinBarberKathleenFleischlJulietGottsdankerJosephineKeysenAnnetteLeavittGloria1948. “A Study of Rumor: Its Origin and Spread.”Human Relations1: 464–85.
19.
FirthRaymond1956. “Rumors in a Primitive Society.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology53: 122–32.
20.
JaegerMarianne. E.AnthonySusanRosnowRalph L.1980. “Who Hears What From Whom and With What Effect: A Study of Rumor.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin6: 473–78.
21.
KnappRobert H.1944. “A Psychology of Rumor.”Public Opinion Quarterly8: 22–27.
22.
KrullDouglas S.AndersonCraig A.1997. “The Process of Explanation.”Current Directions in Psychological Science6 (1): 1–5.
23.
LiHengRosenthalRobertRubinDonald B.1996. “Reliability of Measurement in Psychology: From Spearman-Brown to Maximal Reliability.”Psychological Methods1: 98–107.
24.
RosnowRalph L.1980. “Psychology of Rumor Reconsidered.”Psychology Bulletin87: 578–91.
25.
RosnowRalph L.1991. “Inside Rumor: A Personal Journey.”American Psychologist46: 484–96.
26.
RosnowRalph L.2001. “Rumor and Gossip in Interpersonal Interaction and Beyond: A Social Exchange Perspective.” Pp. 203–32 in Behaving Badly: Aversive Behaviors in Interpersonal Relationships, edited byKowalskiRobin. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27.
RosnowRalph L.EspositoJames L.GibneyLeo1988. “Factors Influencing Rumor Spreading: Replication and Extension.”Language and Communication8: 29–42.
28.
RosnowRalph L.FineGary A.1976. Rumor and Gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay.New York: Elsevier.
29.
RosnowRalph L.KimmelAlan J.2000. “Rumor.” Pp. 122–23 in Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 7, edited byKazdinAlan E.. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
ShibutaniTamotsu1966. Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor.Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
31.
SiegelSidneyCastellanN. John1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.New York: McGraw-Hill.
WalkerCharles J.1996. “Perceived Control in Wish and Dread Rumors.”Presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, March, Washington, DC.
34.
WalkerCharles J.BlaineBruce1991. “The Virulence of Dread Rumors: A Field Experiment.”Language and Communication11: 291–97.
35.
WaltherJoseph B.BurgoonJudee K.1992. “Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction.”Human Communication Research19: 50–88.
36.
WeisbandSuzanne P.SchneiderSherry K.ConnollyTerry1995. “Computer-Mediated Communication and Social Information: Status Salience and Status Differences.”Academy of Management Journal38: 1124–51.
37.
WheelanSusan A.VerdiAnthony F.McKeageRobert1994. The Group Development Observation System: Origins and Applications.Philadelphia: PEP.
