This paper focuses on the political processes through which legitimacy was sought for a large information technology system by its sponsors and key supporters. It is suggested that this was accomplished by means of a niche marketing campaign in which key stakeholder groups were fed radically differ ent explanations regarding the motivations which prompted investment in the system and its likely implications for them and the organization. The system was legitimated by a combination of 'rational' arguments which appealed to stakeholder self-interest and cultural norms, control over the flow of informa tion, and symbolic action. The research contribution this paper makes is to illustrate the symbolic and political processes, some of which can be inter preted as hypocritical, by which a select group attempted to manipulate other actors' understandings of a large and complex IT system.
Baldridge, J.V.1971Power and conflict in the university. New York; Wiley.
2.
Banks, S.1985 'Toward viewing organizational cultures as semiotic texts'. Unpublished paper, University of Southern California.
3.
Barley, S.R.1986 'Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT Scanners and the social order of Radiology departments ', Administrative Science Quarterly31: 78-18.
4.
Berger, P.L., and T. Luckmann1966The social construction of reality. Garden City: Doubleday.
5.
Brown, A.D.1994 'Politics, symbolic action and myth-making in pursuit of legitimacy'. Organization Studies15/6 : 861-878.
6.
Brunsson, N.1989The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Chichester: Wiley .
7.
Buren1962Cited in E. Harvey and R. Mills'Patterns of organizational adaptation: a political perspective' in Power in organizations. M. N. Zald (ed.), 181-213. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1970.
8.
Clegg, S.1975The theory of power and organization. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9.
Clegg, S.1981 'Organizations and control'. Administrative Science Quarterly26: 545-562.
10.
Cohen, A.1974Two dimensional man: an anthropology of power and symbolism in complex society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
11.
Conrad, C.1983'Organizational power, faces and symbolic forms' in Communication in organizations, an interpretive approach. L. L. Putnam and M. E. Pacanowsky (eds.), 173-194. Beverley Hills: Sage.
12.
Daft, R.L. and K.E. Weick1984 'Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems '. Academy of Management Review9/2: 284-295.
13.
Eisenberg, E.M.1984 'Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication '. Communication Monographs51: 227-242.
14.
Eisenberg, E.M., and P. Riley1988'Organizational symbols and sense-making' in Handbook of organizational communication. G. M. Goldhaber and G. A. Bar-nett (eds.), 131-150. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
15.
Evered, R., and M. Louis1981 'Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: 'inquiry from the inside' and 'inquiry from the outside". Academy of Management Review6: 385-396.
16.
Foucault1972Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon.
17.
Gagliardi, P.1986 'The creation and change of organizational cultures: A conceptual framework'. Organization Studies7/2: 117-134.
18.
Geertz, C.1973The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Giddens, A.1979Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Glaser, B.G.1978Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
21.
Glaser, B.G., and A. Strauss1965a Awareness of dyingChicago: Aldine.
22.
Glaser, B.G., and A. Strauss1965b 'Temporal aspects of dying as a non-scheduled status passage' . American Journal of Sociology71: 48-59.
23.
Glaser, B.G., and A. Strauss1967The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
24.
Isabella, L.A.1990 'Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: how managers construe key organizational events'. Academy of Management Journal33/1: 7-41.
25.
Kamens, D.H.1977 'Legitimating myths and educational organization: The relationship between organizational ideology and formal structure'. American Sociological Review42: 208-219.
26.
Keen, P.G.W.1981 'Information systems and organizational change'. Communications of theACM24/1: 24-32.
27.
Keen, T.P.J., and M. Buxton1991Hospitals in transition, the resource management experiment . Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
28.
Kirkwood, W.1983 'Storytelling and self-confrontation: Parables as communication strategies'. Quarterly Journal of Speech69: 58-74.
29.
Kling, R.1987'Defining the boundaries of computing across complex organizations' in Critical issues in information systems research. R. Boland and R. Hirschheim (eds.), 307-362. New York: Wiley .
30.
Kling, R., and S. Iacono1984 'The control of information systems developments after implementaion'. Communications of theACM27/12: 1218-1226.
31.
Knights, D., and F. Murray1992'Politics and pain in managing information technology' . Organization Studies13/2: 211-228.
32.
Levitt and Wall1992The reorganizedNational Health Service , London: Chapman Hall.
33.
McGee, M.C.1980 'The 'ideograph': A link between rhetoric and ideology '. Quarterly Journal of Speech55: 1-16.
34.
March, J.G., and H.A. Simon1958Organizations. New York: Wiley.
35.
Markus, M.L., and J. Pfeffer1983 'Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems'. Accounting, Organizations and Society82/3: 205-218.
36.
Martin, P., and B.A. Turner1986 'Grounded theory and organizational research'. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science22/2: 141-157.
37.
Meyer, J.W., and B. Rowan1977 'Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony'. American Journal of Sociology83: 340-363.
38.
Mintzberg, H.1978'Patterns in strategy formation'. Management Science24/9: 934-948.
39.
Morris, C.W.1949Signs, language and behavior. New York : Prentice-Hall.
40.
Neustadt, R.E., and E.R. May1986Thinking in time: The uses of history for decision-makers . New York: Free Press.
41.
O'Barr, W.M.1984'Asking the right questions about language and power' in Language and power. C. Kramarae , M. Schultz, and W. M. O'Barr (eds.), 260-280. Beverly Hills : Sage.
42.
Parkinson, G.H.R.1968The theory of meaning. London: Oxford University Press.
43.
Peters, T.J.1978 'Symbols, patterns, and settings: An optimistic case for getting things done'. Organizational Dynamics7: 2-23.
44.
Pettigrew, A.M.1972 'Information control as a power resource'. Sociology6: 187-204.
45.
Pettigrew, A.M.1973The politics of organizational decision-making. London: Tavistock.
Pettigrew, A.M., E. Ferlie, and L. McKee.1992Shaping strategic change, making change in large organizations. The case of the National Health Service. London: Sage.
48.
Pfeffer, J.1981 'Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms'. Research in Organizational Behavior3: 1-52.
49.
Pfeffer, J., and A. Leong1977 'Resource allocation in united funds: examination of power and dependence'. Administrative Science Quarterly18: 449-461.
50.
Pfeffer, J., and G.R. Salancik1974 'Organizational decision making as a political process: the case of a university budget'. Administrative Science Quarterly19: 135-151.
51.
Pinch, T.J., and W.E. Bijker1987'The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other' in The social construction of technological systems . W. B. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. Pinch (eds.), 17-50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
Pondy, L.R.1978'Leadership is a language game' in Leadership: where else can we go? M. W. McCall and M. M. Lombardo (eds.), 87-101. Durham, N.C. : Duke University Press.
53.
Putnam, L.L.1983'The interpretive perspective, an alternative to functionalism' in Communication in organizations, an interpretive approach. L. L. Putnam and M. E. Pacanowsky (eds.), 31-54. Beverley Hills: Sage.
54.
Rosen, M.1984 'Breakfast at spiro's: dramaturgy and dominance'. Journal of Management11/2: 31-48.
55.
Schein, E.H.1985Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
56.
Schutz, A.1967The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: North-western University Press.
57.
Schwartz, H.S.1985 'The usefulness of myth and the myth of usefulness; A dilemma for the applied organizational scientist'. Journal of Management11/1: 31-42.
58.
Smircich, L.1983'Organizations as shared meanings' in Organizational symbolism. L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, and T. C. Dandridge (eds.), 55-65. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
59.
Smircich, L., and C. Stubbart1985 'Strategic management in an enacted world'. Academy of Management Review10/4: 724-726.
60.
Smith, S., M. McLaughlin, and D. Smith-Altendorf1985 'A cultural themes perspective: Approaches to the use of stories in the study of the organizational socialization process'. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Honolulu, Hawaii.
61.
Staw, B.M.1980 'Rationality and justification in organizational life' in Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 2. B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), 45-80. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
62.
Strauss, A.1987Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Swan, J.A., and P. Clark1992'Organizational decision-making in the appropriation of technological innovation: cognitive and political dimensions'. European Work and Organizational Psychologist2/2: 103-127.
64.
Thompkins, P.K., and G. Cheney1983'Account analysis of organizations, decision making and identification' in Communication in organizations, an interpretive approach. L. L. Putnam and M. E. Pacanowsky (eds.), 123-146. Beverley Hills : Sage.
65.
Turner, B.1981 'Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: one way of organising the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory'. Quality and Quantity15: 225-247.
66.
Turner, B.1983 'The use of grounded theory for the qualitative analysis of organizational behaviour'. Journal of Management Studies20/3: 333-348.
67.
Turner, B.1986 'Sociological aspects of organisational symbolism'. Organization Studies7/2: 101-115.
68.
Turner, J.H.1987'Analytical theorizing' in Social theory today. A. Giddens and J. H. Turner (eds.), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Cited in K.E. Weick, 1990'Technology as equivoque: Sense making in new technologies', in Technology and organisations. P. S. Goodman and L. S. Sroull (eds.), 1-44. San Francisco : Jossey Bass.
69.
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman1974 'Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases'. Science185: 1124-1131.
70.
Walsham, G.1993Interpreting information systems in organizations. Chichester : Wiley.
71.
Weick, K.E.1979The social psychology of organizing, 2nd ed. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
72.
Weick, K.E.1990'Technology as equivoque: Sense making in new technologies ' in Technology and organisations. P. S. Goodman and L. S. Sproull (eds.), 1-44. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
73.
Wilkins, A.W.1983'Organizational stories as symbols which control the organization' in Organizational symbolism. L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, and T. C. Dandridge (eds.), 81-92. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
74.
Willcocks, L.P., and A.L. Mark1989'IT systems implementation: research findings from the public sector'. Journal of Information Technology4/2: 92-103.
75.
Williams, M.L., and B. Goss1975 'Equivocation: Character insurance'. Human Communication Research1: 265-270.
76.
Wittgenstein, L.1974Philosophical investigations Trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
77.
Yukl, G.A., and K.N. Wexley1971Readings in organizational and industrial psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
78.
Zuboff, S.1988In the age of the smart machine. New York: Basic Books
