Miles and Snow's four different types of strategy are discussed and operationally defined in terms of three recurring organizational problems. A field study of 47 firms was conducted to investigate the typology and the relationship between the typology, size and performance. Support is provided for the analyzer and prospector strategies but there is less evidence for defenders. Results demonstrate the importance of contingency research and indicate that firm size can explain differences in the relationship between strategy and performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blau, P.M., and C.M. Falbe1976 'Technology and organization in manufacturing'. Administrative Science Quarterly21: 20-40.
2.
Buzzell, R.D., B.T. Gale, and V. Sultan1975'Market share — a key to profitability'. Harvard Business Review (January-Febuary): 97-106.
3.
Carter, M.M.1984 'Computerization as a predominate technology: its influence on the structure of newspaper organizations'. Academy of Management Journal27: 247-270.
4.
Chandler, A.D.1962Strategy and structure: chapter in the history of the industry enterprise. Cambridge: M.I.T.
5.
Dewer, R., and J. Hage1978 'Size, technology, complexity, and structural differentiation: toward a theoretical synthesis'. Administrative Science Quarterly23: 111-136.
6.
Dewer, R., and D.P. Simet1981 'A level specific prediction of spans of control examining the effects of size, technology, and specialization'. Academy of Management Journal24: 5-24.
7.
Dess, G.G., and R.B. Robinson, Jr.1984'Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures'. Strategic Management Journal5/3: 286-274.
8.
Ebel, R.L.1951 'Estimation of the reliability of ratings'. Psychometrika16/4: 407-424.
9.
Hambrick, D.C.1983 'Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types'. Academy of Management Journal26: 5-26.
10.
Hambrick, D.C.1984 'Taxonomic approaches to studying strategy: some conceptual and methodological issues'. Journal of Management10/1: 27-42.
11.
Hambrick, D.C., and D. Lei1986 'Toward an empirical prioritization of contingency variables for business strategy'. Academy of Management Journal28: 763-788.
12.
Hofer, C.W.1975 'Toward a contingency theory of business strategy '. Academy of Management Journal18: 784-810.
