Based on an information-processing perspective (Galbraith 1972), a theoretical pro position is advanced which predicts that for work units performing non-routine tasks, the effect of unit coordination on output attainment is contingent on the sources from which the unit acquires information for task performance. This proposition is tested using a cross-national research design. Data from four national samples — Austria, Belgium, Hungary, and Poland — of academic research units support the proposition. The results reinforce the need for a contingency approach to the study of coordination and performance in organizations. They also provide some insight into the interplay between society and organization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albright, Arnold D.1970Management des universites en Belgique. Brussels: Institut Administration Universite.
2.
Andrews, Frank M., (ed.) 1979a Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countriesCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Andrews, Frank M.1979b 'Motivation, diversity, and the performance of research units' in Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries. F. M. Andrews (ed.), 253-289. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
4.
Bhagat, Rabi S., and Sara J. McQuaid1982'Role of subjective culture in organizations: A review and directions for future research'. Journal of Applied Psychology67: 653-685.
5.
Brzezinski, Zbigniew K.1967The Soviet Bloc: Unity and conflict, revised editionCambridge: Harvard University Press.
6.
Chandler, Margaret K.1978 'Project management in the Socialist Bloc'. Columbia Journal of World Business, Summer, 71-86.
7.
Cheng, Joseph L. C.1983 'Interdependence and coordination in organizations: A role-system analysis'. Academy of Management Journal26: 156-162.
8.
Cheng, Joseph L. C.1984 'Organizational coordination, uncertainty, and peformance: An integrative study'. Human Relations37: 829-851.
9.
Cheng, Joseph L. C., and William McKinley1983'Toward an integration of organization research and practice: A contingency study of bureaucratic control and performance in scientific settings'. Administrative Science Quarterly28: 85-100.
10.
Clark, Burton R.1980'Cross-national study of academic systems' in Sociological theory and research. H. M. Blalock, Jr. (ed.), 83-98. New York: The Free Press.
11.
Crozier, Michael1964The Bureaucratic phenomenonChicago : University of Chicago.
12.
Etzioni, Amitai1971'Toward a macrosociology' in Contemporary sociological theory. F. E. Katz (ed.), 161-168. New York: Random House.
13.
Galbraith, Jay R.1972'Organization design: An information processing view' in Organization planning. J. W. Lorsch and P. R. Lawrence (eds.), 49-74. Homewood, III.: Irwin-Dorsey.
14.
Galbraith, Jay R.1977Organization designReading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
15.
Georgopoulos, Basil S.1970'An open-system theory model for organizational research' in Organizational behaviour models. A. R Negandhi and J. P. Schwitter (eds.), 33-70. Ohio : Kent State University.
16.
Georgopoulos, Basil S., and Floyd C. Mann1962The community general hospitalNew York : Macmillan.
17.
Haire, Mason.Edwin E Ghiselli, and Lyman W Porter1966Managerial thinking An international study. New York: Wiley.
18.
Harbison, Frederick, and Charles A. Myers1959Management in the industrial world: An international analysisNew York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Heydebrand, Wolf V., (ed.) 1973Comparative organizations: The results of empirical research. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
20.
Hickson, David J., C. R. Hinings, C.J. McMillan, and J.P. Schwitter1974 'The culture-free context of organization structure: A tri-national comparison'. Sociology8: 59-80.
21.
Katz, Daniel, and Robert L. Kahn1978The social psychology of organizations, second edition . New York: Wiley.
22.
Katz, Ralph, and Michael L. Tushman1979 'Communication patterns, project performance, and task characteristics: An empirical evaluation and integration in an R&D setting'. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance23: 139-162.
23.
Klima, Rolf and Ludger Viehoff1977'The sociology of science in West Germany and Austria' in The sociology of science in Europe. R. K Merton and J. Gaston (eds.), 145-192. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
24.
Krauze Tadeusz, Zdislaw Kowalewski, and Adam Podgorecki1977'The sociology of science in Poland' in The sociology of science in Europe. R. K. Merton and J. Gaston (eds.). 193-223. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
25.
Kuc, Bolec, David J. Hickson, and Charles McMillan1980'Centrally planned development: A comparison of Polish factories with equivalents in Britain, Japan, and Sweden' . Organization Studies1/3: 253-270.
26.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1962The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Lawrence, Paul R., and Jay W. Lorsch1967 'Differentiation and integration in complex organizations '. Administrative Science Quarterly12: 1-47.
28.
Lodahl, Janice B., and Gerald Gordon1972'The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments'. American Sociological Review37: 57-72.
29.
March, James G., and Herbert A. Simon1958Organizations. New York: Wiley.
30.
Meyer, Marshall W.1978'Introduction: Recent developments in organization research and theory' in Environment and organizations. M. W. Meyer and Associates (eds.), 1-19. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Miller Edwin L., and Joseph L.C. Cheng1978 'A closer look at the decision to accept an overseas position' . Management International Review18: 25-34.
32.
Mintzberg, Henry1979The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
33.
Nagandhi, Anant R.1974 'Cross-cultural management studies: Too many conclusions, not enough conceptualization'. Management International Review14: 59-66.
34.
Parsons, Talcott1951The social systemGlencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
35.
Pelz, Donald C., and Frank M. Andrews1966Scientists in organizationsNew York: Wiley.
36.
Perrow, Charles1967'A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations' . American Sociological Review32: 194-209.
37.
Price, James L.1972Handbook of organizational measurementLexington, Mass.: Heath.
38.
Pugh, Derek S.1981'The Aston program of research: Retrospect and prospect' in Perspectives on organization design and behavior. A. H. Van de Ven and W. F. Joyce (eds.), 135-166. New York: Wiley .
39.
Roberts, Karlene H.1970 'On looking at an elephant: An evaluation of cross-cultural research related to organizations'. Psychological Bulletin74: 327-350.
40.
Schollhammer, Hans1973 'Strategies and methodologies in international business and comparative management research'. Management International Review13: 17-32.
41.
Szalai, Alexander1968'National research planning and research statistics: The case of Hungary' in Decision making in national science policy . A. De Reuck, M. Goldsmith, and J. Knight (eds. ), 202-211. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
42.
Tannenbaum, Arnold S., and Robert A. Cooke1979'Organizational control: A review of studies employing the control graph method' in Organizations alike and unlike. Lammer, C. J. and D. J. Hickson (eds.), 183-210. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
43.
Tannenbaum, Arnold S., Bogdan Kavcic, Menochen Rosner, Mino Vianello, and George Wieser1974Hierarchy in organizationsSan Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
44.
Thompson, James D.1967Organizations in actionNew York: McGraw-Hill.
45.
Tushman, Michael L.1978 'Technical communication in R&D laboratories: The impact of project work characteristics'. Academy of Management Journal21: 624-645.
