An empirical study of successful and unsuccessful phases of the life cycle revealed two very significant differences. First, successive successful phases showed gradual and continual increases in the sophistication of their information processing and decision making methods. Unsuccessful phases showed no such continuous development. Second, successful phases revealed few differences in innovation-related variables, while unsuccessful phases demonstrated more significant differences, alternating between greater extremes of innovation and stagnation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adizes, I.1979'Organizational passages: diagnosing and treating life-cycle problems in organizations'. Organizational Dynamics, Summer, 3-27.
2.
Aguilar, F.1967Scanning the business environmentNew York: Macmillan.
3.
Andrews, K.1980The concept of corporate strategyHomewood, Ill.: Irwin.
Greiner, L.1972'Evolution and revolution as organizations grow' . Harvard Business Review, July-August, 37-46.
10.
Hedberg, B.1972'Organization stagnation and choice of strategy' , Working paper, International Institute of Management , West Berlin.
11.
Hedberg, B., P. Nystrom, and W. Starbuck1976'Camping on seesaws: prescriptions for a self-designing organization'. Administrative Science Quarterly21: 41-65.
12.
Khandwalla, P.1972'Environment and its impact on the organization' . International Studies of Management and Organization2:297-313.
13.
Kimberly, J.1979'Issues in the creation of organizations : initiation, innovation, and institutionalization'Academy of Management Journal22:437-457.
14.
Kimberly, J., and R. Miles1980The organizational life cycleSan Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
15.
Lyden, F.1975'Using Parson's functional analysis in the study of public organizations'Administrative Science Quarterly20: 59-70.
16.
Miller, D., and P. Friesen1977'Strategy-making in context: ten empirical archetypes' . Journal of Management Studies14:258-280.
17.
Miller, D., and P. Friesen1980a 'Archetypes of organizational transition'. Administrative Science Quarterly25:268-299.
18.
Miller, D., and P. Friesen1980b 'Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation' . Academy of Management Journal23:591-614.
19.
Miller-, D., and P. Friesen1982a 'A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle' . Working paper, Montreal: McGill University.
20.
Miller, D., and P. Friesen1982b 'Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: two models of strategic momentum'. Strategic Management Journal3:1-25.
21.
Mintzberg, H.1973'Strategy-making in three modes'. California Management Review16:44-53.
22.
Porter, M.1980Competitive strategyNew York : Free Press.
23.
Quinn, R., and K. Cameron1983'Organizational life cycles and shifting criterias of effectiveness: some preliminary evidence'. Management Science29:33-51.
24.
Schon, D.1971Beyond the stable stateNew York: Norton.
25.
Scott, B.1971Stages of corporate development-part 1, case No. 9-371-294Boston: Intercollegiate Case Clearing House, Harvard Business School.
26.
Thompson, V.1961Modern organizationNew York : Knopf.
27.
Torbert, W.1974'Pre-bureaucratic and post-bureaucratic stages of organization development'. Interpersonal Development5: 1-25.
28.
Tushman, M.1977'Special boundary roles in the innovation process' . Administrative Science Quarterly22:587-605.
