Addressing international sustainable development is an urgent and critical challenge. Existing research has focused on the role of individual intermediary organizations in supporting and shaping inclusive local markets to enhance development. However, it has overlooked how clusters of organizations act as intermediaries to build development capacity, and how they do so through local public institutions. This study focuses on the United Nations (UN) system and examines a specific transnational governance arrangement (Delivering as One) that envisioned the creation of local clusters of UN organizations to facilitate institutional capacity-building in developing countries. By comparing the evolution of the eight pilot UN arrangements, we distil a model of how intermediary clusters facilitate local capacity-building through a process of contextual bridging driven by interorganizational collaboration within the cluster. Our findings identify four mechanisms of contextual bridging. The first two – functional amalgamation of operations and development of a cohesive collective voice – strengthened internal collaboration among cluster members; subsequently, sharing authority with local stakeholders and the local calibration of interorganizational collaboration (IOC) allowed the entrenchment of IOC into the local context. Our work contributes to the literature on interorganizational collaboration and transnational governance in the face of global challenges.
AbbottKenneth W.SnidalDuncan (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54, 421–456.
2.
AnsariShahzadWijenFrankGrayBarbara (2013). Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons”. Organization Science, 24, 1014–1040.
3.
BaccaroLucioMeleValentina (2011). For lack of anything better? International organizations and global corporate codes. Public Administration, 89, 451–470.
4.
BaccaroLucioMeleValentina (2012). Pathology of path dependency? The ILO and the challenge of new governance. ILR Review, 65, 195–224.
5.
BörzelTanja A.PamukYaseminStahnAndreas (2008). The European Union and the promotion of good governance in its near abroad: One size fits all?SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 18.
6.
BothelloJoelNasonRobert S.SchnyderGerhard (2019). Institutional voids and organization studies: Towards an epistemological rupture. Organization Studies, 40, 1499–1512.
7.
BrunssonNilsJacobssonBengt (2002). A world of standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
CamposLuciana (2021). Understanding change in international organizations across time and spaces: The rise of UN country teams. Global Policy, 12(S7), 55–67.
9.
CanalesRodrigoBradburyMikaelaSheldonAnthonyCannonCharlie (2024). Evidence in practice: How structural and programmatic scaffolds enable collaboration in international development. Administrative Science Quarterly, 69, 655–710.
10.
CappellaroGiuliaCompagniAmeliaDacinM. Tina (2024). Trajectories of value generation and capturing by public–private hybrids: Mechanisms of multi-level governance in healthcare. Organization Studies, 45, 247–273.
11.
CompagniAmeliaCappellaroGiuliaNigamAmit (2024). Responding to professional knowledge disruptions of unmitigable uncertainty: The role of emotions, practices, and moral duty among COVID-19 physicians. Academy of Management Journal, 67, 829–861.
12.
DacinM. TinaZilberTammar B.CartelMélodieKiblerEwald (2024). Navigating place: Extending perspectives on place in organization studies. Organization Studies, 45, 1191–1212.
13.
DjelicMarie-Laure (1998). Exporting the American model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
DjelicMarie-Laureden HondFrank (2014). Introduction: Multiplicity and plurality in the world of standards: Symposium on multiplicity and plurality in the world of standards. Business and Politics, 16, 67–77.
15.
DjelicMarie-LaureQuackSigrid (Eds.) (2010). Transnational communities: Shaping global economic governance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DjelicMarie-LaureSahlin-AnderssonKerstin (Eds.) (2006). Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FindleyMichael G.MilnerHelen V.NielsonDaniel L. (2017). The choice among aid donors: The effects of multilateral vs. bilateral aid on recipient behavioral support. Review of International Organizations, 12, 307–334.
19.
FismanRaymondKhannaTarun (2004). Facilitating development: The role of business groups. World Development, 32, 609–628.
20.
FranksTom (1999). Capacity building and institutional development: Reflections on water. Public Administration and Development, 19, 51–61.
21.
FukuyamaFrancis (2004). The imperative of state-building. Journal of Democracy, 15(2), 17–31.
22.
GrayBarbara (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
23.
GrayBarbaraPurdyJillAnsariShazad (2022). Confronting power asymmetries in partnerships to address grand challenges. Organization Theory, 3(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221098765
24.
HardyCynthiaLawrenceThomas B.GrantDavid (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30, 58–77.
25.
HardyCynthiaPhillipsNelson (1998). Strategies of engagement: Lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organization Science, 9, 217–230.
26.
HedbergLeanne M.LounsburyMichael (2021). Not just small potatoes: Cultural entrepreneurship in the moralizing of markets. Organization Science, 32, 433–454.
27.
HibbertPaulHuxhamChris (2010). The past in play: Tradition in the structures of collaboration. Organization Studies, 31, 525–554.
28.
HjertholmPeterWhiteHoward (2000). Foreign aid in historical perspective. In FinnTarp (Ed.), Foreign aid and development: Lessons learnt and directions for the future (pp. 80–102). London: Routledge.
29.
HuberGeorge P.PowerDaniel J. (1985). Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 171–180.
30.
JacobssonBengt (2006). Regulated regulators: Global trends of state transformation. In Marie-LaureDjelicKerstinSahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation (pp. 205–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
KerwerDieter (2005). Rules that many use: Standards and global regulation. Governance, 18, 611–632.
32.
KhannaTarunPalepuKrishna G. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
33.
KodeihFarahSchildtHenriLawrenceThomas B. (2023). Countering indeterminate temporariness: Sheltering work in refugee camps. Organization Studies, 44, 175–199.
34.
KruckAndreasZanglBernhard (2019). Trading privileges for support: The strategic co-optation of emerging powers into international institutions. International Theory, 11, 318–343.
35.
KühlStefan (2009). Capacity development as the model for development aid organizations. Development and Change, 40, 551–577.
36.
LakeDavid A.MartinLisa L.RisseThomas (2021). Challenges to the liberal order: Reflections on International Organization. International Organization, 75, 225–257.
37.
MaguireSteveHardyCynthia (2005). Identity and collaborative strategy in the Canadian HIV/AIDS treatment domain. Strategic Organization, 3, 11–45.
38.
MairJohannaMartíIgnasi (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 419–435.
39.
MairJohannaMartíIgnasiVentrescaMarc J. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 819–850.
40.
McKagueKevinZietsmaCharleneOliverChristine (2015). Building the social structure of a market. Organization Studies, 36, 1063–1093.
41.
MeleValentinaCappellaroGiulia (2018). Cross-level coordination among international organizations: Dilemmas and practices. Public Administration, 96, 736–752.
42.
MeleValentinaSchepersDonald H. (2013). E Pluribus Unum? Legitimacy issues and multi-stakeholder codes of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 561–576.
43.
PerobelliEleonoraCappellaroGiuliaSaporitoRaffaella (2024). Public–private hybrid organisations in the public sector: Evidence and future directions from a systematic literature review. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2365244
44.
RodrikDani (2001). Development strategies for the next century. Seminar “Development Theory at the Threshold of the Twenty-First Century”. Commemorative event to mark the centenary of the birth of Raúl Prebisch. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile, 28–29August2001.
45.
UN General Assembly (1997). United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/S-19/2, adopted on June 28, 1997.
46.
VallejoBerthaWehnUta (2016). Capacity development evaluation: The challenge of the results agenda and measuring return on investment in the global south. World Development, 79, 1–13.
47.
van WijkJakomijnvan WijkJeroenDrostSarahStamWouter (2020). Challenges in building robust interventions in contexts of poverty: Insights from an NGO-driven multi-stakeholder network in Ethiopia. Organization Studies, 41, 1391–1415.
48.
VenkataramanHemalathaVermeulenPatrickRaaijmakersAafkeMairJohanna (2016). Market meets community: Institutional logics as strategic resources for development work. Organization Studies, 37, 709–733.
49.
WebbJustin W.KhouryTheodore A.HittMichael A. (2020). The influence of formal and informal institutional voids on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44, 504–526.
50.
WhitfieldLindsayFraserAlastair (2010). Negotiating aid: The structural conditions shaping the negotiating strategies of African governments. International Negotiation, 15, 341–366.
