This study discusses the relationship between inter-organizational paradox management, national business systems and global value chains. Using case study evidence from a global value chain in the footwear industry (in Germany and China), we analyse how different businesses in the chain responded to the paradoxical tension arising from the competing demands to provide a living wage to workers and to uphold financial performance. Our findings highlight organizational responses to this paradox along the value chain, showing how these responses were shaped by the interplay of different types of pressures exerted by national business systems and the value chain itself. While these pressures were aligned in the German part of the chain, they were not aligned on the Chinese side. The study makes two contributions: (1) we develop a taxonomy outlining how the alignment of different types of pressures influences whether organizations choose either proactive or defensive paradox management; and (2) we argue that theorizing the impacts of cross-national distance on paradox management can be enhanced by adopting a multidimensional approach to institutional variety that extends beyond culture-based arguments.
AnsariShaz M.FissPeer C.ZajacEdward J. (2010). Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35, 67–92.
2.
AshforthBlake E.RogersKristie M.PrattMichael G.PradiesCamille (2014). Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach. Organization Science, 25, 1453–1478.
3.
BarrientosStephanie (2013). Corporate purchasing practices in global production networks: A socially contested terrain. Geoforum, 44, 44–51.
4.
BerryHeatherGuillénMauro F.ZhouNan (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1460–1480.
5.
BertiMarcoSimpsonAce (2021). The dark side of organizational paradoxes: The dynamics of disempowerment. Academy of Management Review, 42, 252–274.
6.
CarrStuart C.ParkerJaneArrowsmithJamesWattersPaul A. (2016). The living wage: Theoretical integration and an applied research agenda. International Labour Review, 155, 1–24.
7.
FlemingPeterSpicerAndré (2014). Power in management and organization science. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 237–298.
8.
GereffiGaryFernandez-StarkKarina (2016). Global value chain analysis: A primer (2nd Edition). Durham, NC: Duke University Center on Globalization, Governance, and Competitiveness.
9.
GereffiGaryHumphreyJohnSturgeonTimothy (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.
10.
GhemawatPankaj (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137–147.
11.
HahnTobiasPinkseJonatanPreussLutzFiggeFrank (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 297–316.
12.
HeniszWithold J.WilliamsonOliver E. (1999). Comparative economic organization—Within and between countries. Business and Politics, 1, 261–277.
13.
HofmanPeter S.MoonJeremyWuBin (2017). Corporate social responsibility under authoritarian capitalism: Dynamics and prospects of state-led and society-driven CSR. Business & Society, 56, 651–671.
14.
HothoJasper J. (2014). From typology to taxonomy: A configurational analysis of national business systems and their explanatory power. Organization Studies, 35, 671–702.
15.
JarzabkowskiPaulaBednarekRebeccaChalkiasKonstantinosCacciatoriEugenia (2019). Exploring inter-organizational paradoxes: Methodological lessons from a study of a grand challenge. Strategic Organization, 17, 120–132.
16.
JarzabkowskiPaulaLêJane K. (2017). We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organization Studies, 38, 433–462.
17.
JarzabkowskiPaulaLêJane K.van de VenAndrew H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11, 245–280.
KnightEricParoutisSotirios (2017). Becoming salient: The TMT leader’s role in shaping the interpretive context of paradoxical tensions. Organization Studies, 38, 403–432.
20.
LaneChristel (1997). European business systems: Britain and Germany compared. In WhitleyRichard (Ed.), European business systems: Firms and markets in their national contexts (1st edition) (pp. 64–97). London: SAGE Publications.
21.
LangleyAnn (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
22.
LeeSun HyeMellahiKamelMolMichael J.PereiraVijay (2020). No-size-fits-all: Collaborative governance as an alternative for addressing labour issues in global supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 291–305.
23.
LewisMarianne W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760–776.
24.
LiPeter Ping (2016). Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the East. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23, 42–77.
25.
MattenDirkMoonJeremy (2008). ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.
26.
MillerDoug (2013). Towards sustainable labour costing in UK fashion retail. Manchester: Capturing the Gains, University of Manchester.
27.
Miron-SpektorEllaIngramAmyKellerJoshuaSmithWendy K.LewisMarianne W. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 26–45.
28.
NelsonRichard R.RosenbergNathan (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In NelsonRichard R. (Ed.), National innovation system (pp. 3–21). New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
PrashanthamShameenEranovaMariya (2020). Cultural differences in paradoxical tensions in strategy episodes. Long Range Planning, 53, 101849.
30.
ReineckeJulianeDonagheyJimmyWilkinsonAdrianWoodGeoffrey (2018). Global supply chains and social relations at work: Brokering across boundaries. Human Relations, 71, 459–480.
31.
SchadJonathanLewisMarianne W.RaischSebastian.SmithWendy K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64.
32.
SchmidtChristoph G.FoerstlKaiSchaltenbrandBirte (2017). The supply chain position paradox: Green practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(1), 3–25.
33.
SharmaGarimaBansalPratima (2017). Partners for good: How business and NGOs engage the commercial–social paradox. Organization Studies, 38, 341–364.
34.
SilviaStephen J. (2013). Holding the shop together: German industrial relations in the postwar era. Ithaca: ILR Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press.
35.
SmithWendy K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1592–1623.
36.
SmithWendy K.LewisMarianne W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.
37.
StraussAnselm L.CorbinJuliet M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
38.
WhitleyRichard (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
WittMichael A.ReddingGordon (2013). Asian business systems: Institutional comparison, clusters and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems theory. Academy of Management Review, 11, 265–300.
40.
WittMichael A.ReddingGordon (2014). China: Authoritarian capitalism. In WittMichael A.ReddingGordon (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of asian business systemssystems (pp. 11–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
XiaoChengyongWilhelmMiriamvan der VaartTacovan DonkDirk Pieter (2019). Inside the buying firm: Exploring responses to paradoxical tensions in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 55(1), 3–20.
42.
YinRobert K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th edition). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC: SAGE Publications.
43.
ZhangYanWaldmanDavid A.HanYu-LanLiXiao-Bei (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 538–566.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
