We shed new light on the processes through which institutions are created and changed by investigating the question how does institutional entrepreneuring unfold in an already organized world. We conducted a longitudinal case study of the field of scientific research production in Australia, which changed over three decades through entrepreneuring processes associated with the creation of a new ‘Smart State’ place in the city of Brisbane in Queensland. A new place is a form of organizing human activity that has materiality and meaning at a specific geographic location. Our findings showed how field change was interwoven with place creation through four processes of entrepreneuring: structural emancipation, dissociating and reimagining place meanings, bricolaging of place forms and co-evolving place identities. These entrepreneuring processes constituted the field as a flow of ‘becoming’ that spilled over into temporary and provisional settlements in local places. Our findings make important contributions through: (1) deepening understanding of how organizational fields change through multilevel, distributed, cascading and often unreflexive processes of entrepreneuring in an already organized world; (2) bringing attention to a relationship between institutions and place, in which place is both the medium and outcome of institutional entrepreneuring; and (3) providing new insight into embedded agency by illustrating how institutions in ‘becoming’ continually (re)produce the resources and possibilities for agency within gradual institutional change over time.
AbdelnourSamerHasselbladhHansKallinikosJannis (2017). Agency and institutions in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 38, 1775–1792.
2.
BakerTedNelsonReed E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329–366.
3.
BattilanaJulieD’AunnoThomas (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In LawrenceThomas B.SuddabyRoyLecaBernard (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Ben-SilmaneKarimJustoRachidaKhelilNabil (2020). Institutional entrepreneurship in a contested commons: Insights from struggles over the Oasis of Jemna in Tunisia. Journal of Business Ethics, 166, 673–690.
5.
BerendsHansDekenFleur (2021). Composing qualitative process research. Strategic Organization, 19, 134–146.
6.
BjerregaardTokeJonassonCharlotte (2014). Managing unstable institutional contradictions: The work of becoming. Organization Studies, 35, 1507–1536.
7.
BouilloudJean-PhilippePereztsMarVialeThierrySchaepelynckValentin (2020). Beyond the stable image of institutions: Using institutional analysis to tackle classic questions in institutional theory. Organization Studies, 41, 153–174.
8.
BuhrKatarina (2012). The inclusion of aviation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Temporal conditions for institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 33, 1565–1587.
9.
CharltonPeter (1987). State of mind: Why Queensland is different. Sydney, Australia: Methuen Hayes.
10.
CloutierCharlotteLangleyAnn (2020). What makes a process theoretical contribution?Organization Theory, 1, 1–32.
11.
ColomberoSylvainDuymedjianRaffiBoutinotAmelie (2021). The embedded-agency paradox revisited: Discussing Deleuze and Guattari’s concept of becoming for institutional entrepreneurship. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 37, doi.org/10.10161/j.scaman.12021.101142.
12.
Delbridge, RickEdwardsTim (2008). Challenging conventions: Roles and processes during non-isomorphic institutional change. Human Relations, 61, 299–325.
13.
EvansRaymond (2007). A history of Queensland. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
14.
FerontCecileBertelsStephanie (2021). The impact of frame ambiguity on field-level change. Organization Studies, 42, 1135–1165.
15.
FlickUwe (2002). An introduction to qualitative research (2nd edition). London: SAGE Publications.
16.
GarudRaghuHardyCynthiaMaguireSteve (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28, 957–969.
17.
GarudRaghuJainSanjayKumaraswamyArun (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 196–214.
18.
GarudRaghuKarnoePeter (2003). Bricolage vs. breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32, 277–300.
19.
GierynThomas F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463–496.
20.
GreenwoodRoystonSuddabyRoy (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 27–48.
21.
HardyCynthiaMaguireSteve (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In GreenwoodRoystonOliverChristineSuddabyRoySahlin-AnderssonKerstin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198–217). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
22.
HardyCynthiaMaguireSteve (2017). Institutional entrepreneurship and change in fields. InGreenwoodRoystonOliverChristineLawrenceThomas B.MeyerRenate E. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd edition, pp. 261–280). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
23.
HelinJennyHernesTorHjorthDanielHoltRobin (2014). Process is how process does. In HoltRobinHernesTorHelinJennyHjorthDaniel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of process philosophy and organization studies (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HenfridssonOlaYooYoungjin (2013). The liminality of trajectory shifts in institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 25, 932–950.
25.
HjorthDaniel (2004). Creating space for play/invention: Concepts of space and organizational entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16, 413–432.
26.
HjorthDaniel (2014). Entrepreneuring as organisation-creation. In SternbergRolfKraussGerhard (Eds.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship and creativity (pp. 97–121). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
27.
HjorthDanielHoltRobinSteyaertChris (2015). Entrepreneurship and process studies. International Small Business Journal, 33, 599–611.
HjorthDanielSteyaertChris (2009). The politics and aesthetics of entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
30.
JarzabkowskiPaulaLeJaneSpeePaul (2017). Taking a strong process approach to analyzing qualiative process data. In LangleyAnnTsoukasHaridimos (Eds.), The Sage handbook of process organization studies (pp. 237–253). London: SAGE Publications.
31.
JonesBarry (2007). A thinking reed. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
32.
KaufmanJasonKalinerMatthew E. (2011). The re-accomplishment of place in twentieth century Vermont and New Hampshire: History repeats itself until it doesn’t. Theory and Society, 40, 119–154.
33.
KhanFarzad R.MunirKamal A.WillmottHugh (2007). A dark side of institutional entrepreneurship: Soccer balls, child labour and postcolonial impoverishment. Organization Studies, 28, 1055–1077.
34.
LangleyAnn (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
35.
LarkinsFrank (2011). Australian higher education: Research policies and performance 1987–2010. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
36.
LawrenceThomas B.DoverGraham (2015). Place and institutional work: Creating housing for the hard-to-house. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 371–410.
37.
LawrenceThomas B.PhillipsNelson (2004). From Moby Dick to Free Willy: Macro-cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization, 11, 689–711.
38.
LounsburyMichaelCrumleyEllen T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28, 993–1012.
39.
MaguireSteveHardyCynthiaLawrenceThomas B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657–679.
40.
OlsenTricia D. (2017). Rethinking collection action: The co-evolution of the state and institutional entrepreneurs in emerging economies. Organization Studies, 38, 31–52.
41.
PallesenEva (2018). Creativity, play and listening: An auditory re-conceptualization of entrepreneurial creation in the context of New Public Management. Organization Studies, 39, 191–207.
42.
PerkmannMarkusSpicerAndre (2007). ‘Healing the scars of history’: Projects, skills and field strategies in institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28, 1101–1122.
43.
PrasadPushkalaPrasadAnshumanBakerKelly (2016). Smoke and mirrors: Institutional entrepreneurship and gender identities in the US tobacco industry, 1920–1945. Organization, 23, 227–249.
44.
QureshiIsrarKistruckGeoffrey M.BhattBabita (2016). The enabling and constraining effects of social ties in the process of institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 37, 425–447.
45.
RindovaViolinaBarryDavedKetchenDavid J. (2009). Introduction to special topic forum: Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Academy of Management Review, 34, 477–491.
46.
RothenbergSandra (2007). Environmental managers as institutional entrepreneurs: The influence of institutional and technical pressures on waste management. Journal of Business Research, 60, 749–757.
47.
SchneibergMark (2007). What’s on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Economic Review, 5, 47–80.
48.
SeoMyeong-GuCreedW. E. Douglas (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222–247.
49.
SteyaertChris (2007). Entrepreneuring as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19, 453–477.
50.
SteyaertChrisKatzJerome (2004). Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: Geographical, discursive and social dimensions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16, 179–196.
TuanYi-Fu (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
54.
WrightApril L.MeyerAlan M.ReayTrishStaggsJonathan (2021). Maintaining places of social inclusion: Ebola and the emergency department. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66, 42–85.
55.
WrightApril L.ZammutoRaymond F. (2013). Creating opportunities for institutional entrepreneurship: The colonel and the cup in English county cricket. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 51–68.
