Digital technologies are reconfiguring organizations and their environments. Activities are increasingly distributed across fields and coordinated by data, algorithms and machines. This paper investigates data objects (objects made of data structured and aggregated under a specific template) and their role in structuring fields and field practices. It studies programmatic advertising, an automated bidding process with hundreds of participants, whereby media spaces are auctioned in real time as individual users browse online content. To work on such a large scale, programmatic advertising must standardize existing field knowledge into data and coordinate collective action through objects, algorithms and technologies. This study shows how data, data objects and their infrastructures are involved in transforming the links between institutions and practice. The makeup and functioning of data and data objects reorient existing cognitive, normative and regulative structures, constrain the rule of engagement of actors and enable field-level autonomous interaction. The datafication of knowledge and automation of practices exposed in this paper call for a thorough rethinking of existing approaches to the concepts of organizations and fields.
AaltonenAleksiAlaimoCristinaKallinikosJannis (2021). The making of data commodities: Data analytics as an embedded process. Journal of Management Information Systems. (forthcoming)
2.
AbdelnourSamerHasselbladhHansKallinikosJannis (2017). Agency and institutions in organization studies. Organization Studies, 38, 1775–1792.
3.
AlaimoCristinaKallinikosJannis (2017). Computing the everyday: Social media as data platforms. The Information Society, 33(4), 175–191.
4.
AlaimoCristinaKallinikosJannis (2018). Objects, metrics and practices: An inquiry into the programmatic advertising ecosystem. In Working Conference on Information Systems and Organizations (pp. 110–123). Cham: Springer.
5.
AlaimoCristinaKallinikosJannis (2019a). Recommender systems. In BeyesTimonHoltRobinPiasClaus (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of media, technology and organization studies (pp. 401–411). Oxford: Oxford University Press,
6.
AlaimoCristinaKallinikosJannis (2019b). Social media and the infrastructuring of sociality. In KornbergerMartinBowkerGeoffrey C.ElyacharJuliaMennickenAndreaMillerPeterNuchoJ. RandaPollockNeil (Eds.), Thinking infrastructures (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 62) (pp. 289–306). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
7.
AlaimoCristinaKallinikosJannis (2021). Managing by data: Algorithmic categories and organizing. Organization Studies, 42, 1385–1407.
8.
AlaimoCristinaKallinikosJannisAaltonenAleksi (2020). Data and value. In NambisanSatishLyytinen>KalleYooYoungjin (Eds.), Handbook of digital innovation (pp. 162–178). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9.
AlvessonMatsSpicerAndré (2019). Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: A mid-life crisis. Organization Studies, 40, 199–218.
10.
ArthurBrian W. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York: Simon & Schuster.
11.
ArthurBrian W. (2011). The second economy. McKinsey Quarterly, October, McKinsey & Company.
12.
BaileyDiane E.LeonardiPaul M.BarleyStephen R. (2012). The lure of the virtual. Organization Science, 23, 1485–1504.
13.
BarleyStephen R.TolbertPamela S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institutions. Organization Studies, 18, 93–117.
14.
BechkyBeth A. (2003). Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 720–752.
15.
BenigerJames R. (1986). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
BeverungenArminLangeAnn-Christina (2018). Cognition in high-frequency trading: The costs of consciousness and the limits of automation. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(6), 75–95.
17.
BeverungenArminBeyesTimonConradLisa (2019). The organizational powers of (digital) media. Organization, 26, 621–635.
18.
BeyesTimonHoltRobinPiasClaus (Eds.) (2020). The Oxford handbook of media, technology, and organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
BeyesTimonPiasClaus (2019). The media arcane. Grey Room (75), 84–107.
20.
BorgmannAlbert (1999). Holding on to reality: The nature of information at the turn of the millennium. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
BourdieuPierre (1980/1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
BowkerGeoffrey C.StarSusan L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
BowkerGeoffrey C.TimmermansStefanClarkeAdele E.BalkaEllen (Eds.) (2016). Boundary objects and beyond: Working with Leigh Star. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
BoxenbaumEvaJonesCandaceMeyerRenate E.SvejenovaSilviya (2018). Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in organization studies. Organization Studies, 39, 579–616.
25.
BrattonBenjamin H. (2016). The stack: On software and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
BucklandMichel K. (1991). Information and information systems (No. 25). ABC-CLIO.
27.
CarlilePaul R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13, 442–455.
28.
ChunWendy H. K. (2011). Programmed visions: Software and memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
ChunWendy H. K. (2016). Updating to remain the same: Habitual new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
CluleyRobert (2018). The construction of marketing measures: The case of viewability. Marketing Theory, 18, 287–305.
31.
CluleyRobert (2020). The politics of consumer data. Marketing Theory, 20, 45–63.
32.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
33.
DourishPaul (2016). Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society, 3(2).
34.
DourishPaul (2017). The stuff of bits: An essay on the materialities of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
EcoUmberto (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
36.
EkbiaHamid R. (2009). Digital artifacts as quasi-objects: Qualification, mediation, and materiality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2554–2566.
37.
EwensteinBorisWhyteJennifer (2009). Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as epistemic objects. Organization Studies, 30, 7–30.
38.
FaulknerPhilipRundeJochen (2019). Theorizing the digital object. MIS Quarterly, 43, 1279–1302.
39.
FligsteinNeilMcAdamDouglas (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
FlyverbomMikkel (2019). The digital prism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
FlyverbomMikkelDeibertRonaldMattenDirk (2019). The governance of digital technology, big data, and the internet: New roles and responsibilities for business. Business & Society, 58, 3–19.
42.
FlyverbomMikkelMurrayJohn (2018). Datastructuring: Organizing and curating digital traces into action. Big Data & Society, 5(2).
43.
GiddensAnthony (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
GitelmanLisa (2013). Raw data is an oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
GitelmanLisa (2014). Paper knowledge: Toward a media history of documents. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
46.
GrenfellMichael (2014). Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts. London: Routledge
47.
HackingIan (1986). Making up people. In HellerThomas C.SosnerMortonWellberyDavid E. (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought (pp. 161–171). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
48.
HannanMichael T.FreemanJohn (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.
49.
HansethOle (2000). The economics of standards. In CiborraClaudio (Ed.), From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures (pp. 56–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
HasselbladhHansKallinikosJannis (2000). The project of rationalization: A critique and reappraisal of neoinstitutionalism in organization studies. Organization Studies, 21, 697–720.
51.
HuiYuk (2016). On the existence of digital objects. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
52.
HwangTim (2020). Subprime attention crisis: Advertising and the time bomb at the heart of the Internet. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
53.
JonesMatthewBlackwellAlan F.PrinceKarlMeakinsSallyanneSimpsonAlexanderVuylstekeAlain (2019). Data as process: From objective resource to contingent performance. In ReayTrishZilberTammar B.LangleyAnnTsoukasHaridimos (Eds.), Institutions and organizations: A process view (pp. 227–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
KallinikosJannisAaltonenAleksiMartonAttila (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 37, 357–370.
55.
KallinikosJannisHasselbladhHans (2009). Work, control and computation: Rethinking the legacy of neo-institutionalism. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 27, 257–282.
56.
KallinikosJannisHasselbladhHansMartonAttila (2013). Governing social practice. Theory and Society, 42, 395–421.
57.
Knorr CetinaKarin (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
Knorr CetinaKarin (2001). Objectual practice. In SchatzkiTheodore R.CetinaKarin KnorrVon SavignyEike (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 184–197). London: Routledge.
59.
KolbDarl G.DeryKristineHuysmanMarleenMetiuAnca (2020). Connectivity in and around organizations: Waves, tensions and trade-offs. Organization Studies, 41, 1589–1599.
60.
LabatutJulieAggeriFranckGirardNathalie (2012). Discipline and change: How technologies and organizational routines interact in new practice creation. Organization Studies, 33, 39–69.
61.
LangeAnne-ChristinaLengletMarcSeyfertRobert (2016). Cultures of high-frequency trading: Mapping the landscape of algorithmic developments in contemporary financial markets. Economy and Society, 45, 149–165.
62.
LanzaraGiovan Francesco (2009). Reshaping practice across media: Material mediation, medium specificity and practical knowledge in judicial work. Organization Studies, 30, 1369–1390.
63.
LeonardiPaul M.TreemJeffrey W. (2020). Behavioral visibility: A new paradigm for organization studies in the age of digitization, digitalization, and datafication. Organization Studies, 41, 1601–1625.
64.
LounsburyMichaelCrumleyEllen T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28, 993–1012.
65.
LounsburyMichaelVentrescaMarc (2003). The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organization, 10, 457–480.
66.
LounsburyMichaelWangMilo S. (2020). Into the clearing: Back to the future of constitutive institutional analysis. Organization Theory, 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787719891173.
67.
MacKenzieDonald (2006). An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68.
MarchJames G.OlsenJohan P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. New York: The Free Press.
69.
MillerPeterO’LearyTed (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 235–265.
NapoliPhilippe M. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
72.
NapoliPhilippe M. (2012). Audience economics: Media institutions and the audience marketplace. New York: Columbia University Press.
73.
OrlikowskiWanda J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404–428.
74.
PlesnerUrsulaHustedEmil (2019). Digital organizing: Revisiting themes in organization studies. London: Red Globe Press.
75.
ScottRichard W. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. London: SAGE Publications.
76.
StarSusan L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35, 601–617.
77.
StarSusan L.GriesemerJames R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
78.
TurowJoseph (2011). The daily you: How the new advertising industry is defining your identity and your worth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
79.
WegnerPeter (1997). Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms. Communications of the ACM, 40(5), 80–91.
80.
WootenMelissaHoffmanAndrew J. (2017). Organizational fields: Past, present and future. In GreenwoodRoystonOliverChristineLawrenceThomas B.MeyerRenate E. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 131–147). London: SAGE Publications.
81.
YatesJoAnne (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
82.
YinRobert (2009). Case study research design: Design and methods. London: SAGE Publications.
83.
ZuboffShoshana (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.
84.
ZuboffShoshana (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89.
85.
ZuboffShoshana (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books.
