Alignment of organizations with external imperatives is seen as a sine qua non of proper organizing and strategizing by many fit and complexity scholars. Any deviation from this management mantra engenders organizational decline and, ultimately, mortality. We put this axiomatic principle under empirical scrutiny and use the law of requisite variety as our organizing principle to do so. The law is an iconic cornerstone of this matching contingency logic and it has served to legitimize a wide range of fit decisions in, e.g., leadership, organizational learning and corporate governance. Inspired by organizational vignettes inhabiting antithetical complexity regimes, we introduce a novel concept, which we label ‘agentic misfit’. In this way, we deconstruct deterministic assumptions related to environmental fittingness, we challenge teleological orientations in the fit literature, and we flesh out the viability of non-matching human agency amid complexity.
AndersonP. (1999). Perspective: Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10, 216–232.
2.
AshbyW. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
3.
BarneyJ. B.FelinT. (2013). What are microfoundations?Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 138–155.
4.
BoisotM.McKelveyB. (2010). Integrating modernist and postmodernist perspectives on organizations: A complexity science bridge. Academy of Management Review, 35, 415–433.
5.
BurnesB. (2005). Complexity theories and organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 73–90.
6.
BurtonR. M.LauridsenJ.ObelB. (2002). Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Science, 48, 1461–1485.
7.
CarmeliA.GelbardR.GefenD. (2010). The importance of innovation leadership in cultivating strategic fit and enhancing firm performance. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 339–349.
8.
CaschiliS.MeddaF. R. (2012). A review of the maritime container shipping industry as a complex adaptive system. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems: INDECS, 10, 1–15.
9.
ChildJ.RodriguesS. B. (2011). How organizations engage with external complexity: A political action perspective. Organization Studies, 32, 803–824.
10.
ChilesT. H.MeyerA. D.HenchT. J. (2004). Organizational emergence: The origin and transformation of Branson, Missouri’s musical theaters. Organization Science, 15, 499–519.
11.
ChiuC. C. H. (2006). Changing experiences of work in reformed state-owned enterprises in China. Organization Studies, 27, 677–697.
12.
ChivaR.GrandíoA.AlegreJ. (2010). Adaptive and generative learning: Implications from complexity theories. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 114–129.
13.
CilliersP. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
14.
CollinsJ. D.UhlenbruckK.RodriguezP. (2009). Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 89–108.
15.
CreedW. D.DeJordyR.LokJ. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1336–1364.
16.
de BakkerF. G. A.den HondF.KingB.WeberK. (2013). Social movements, civil society and corporations: Taking stock and looking ahead. Organization Studies, 34, 573–593.
17.
DelbridgeR. (2007). Explaining conflicted collaboration: A critical realist approach to hegemony. Organization Studies, 28, 1347–1357.
18.
DelbridgeR.EdwardsT. (2013). Inhabiting institutions: Critical realist refinements to understanding institutional complexity and change. Organization Studies, 34, 927–947.
19.
DonzéP. Y.FujiokaR. (2015). European luxury big business and emerging Asian markets, 1960–2010. Business History, 57, 822–840.
EghenterA. S. (2018). Organizational creativity, play and entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 39, 169–190.
22.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.
23.
FerrierW. J. (2001). Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 858–877.
24.
GarudR.GehmanJ.KumaraswamyA. (2011). Complexity arrangements for sustained innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation. Organization Studies, 32, 737–767.
25.
GodsiffP. (2010). Service systems and requisite variety. Service Science, 2, 92–101.
26.
GohK. T.PentlandB. T. (2018). Temporal trajectories of enacted complexity in creative project teams. AoM Global Proceedings.
27.
GoulielmosA. M. (2002). Complexity theory applied to management of shipping companies. Maritime Policy & Management, 29, 375–391.
28.
GreenwoodR.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 27–48.
HeracleousL.WerresK. (2016). On the road to disaster: Strategic misalignments and corporate failure. Long Range Planning, 49, 491–506.
31.
HeylighenF.CilliersP.GershensonC. (2006). Complexity and philosophy. arXiv preprint cs/0604072.
32.
HibbertP.HuxhamC. (2010). The past in play: Tradition in the structures of collaboration. Organization Studies, 31, 525–554.
33.
JenkinsS.DelbridgeR. (2017). Trusted to deceive: A case study of ‘strategic deception’ and the normalization of lying at work. Organization Studies, 38, 53–76.
34.
JensenN. M.LiQ.RahmanA. (2010). Understanding corruption and firm responses in cross-national firm-level surveys. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1481–1504.
35.
JonesC.MassaF. G. (2013). From novel practice to consecrated exemplar: Unity Temple as a case of institutional evangelizing. Organization Studies, 34, 1099–1136.
36.
JonesC.SvejenovaS.PedersenJ. S.TownleyB. (2016). Misfits, mavericks and mainstreams: Drivers of innovation in the creative industries. Organization Studies, 37, 751–768.
37.
JusticeV.BhaskarP.PatemanH.CainP.CahoonS. (2016). US container port resilience in a complex and dynamic world. Maritime Policy & Management, 43, 179–191.
38.
KalpokaiteN.RadivojevicI. (2019). Leading a successful transition to democracy: A qualitative analysis of political leadership in Spain and Lithuania. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618814555
39.
KapfererJ. N. (2014). The artification of luxury: From artisans to artists. Business Horizons, 57, 371–380.
40.
KatsikeasC. S.SamieeS.TheodosiouM. (2006). Strategy fit and performance consequences of international marketing standardization. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 867–890.
41.
KislovR.HydeP.McDonaldR. (2017). New game, old rules? Mechanisms and consequences of legitimation in boundary spanning activities. Organization Studies, 38, 1421–1444.
42.
KochJ.WenzelM.SenfN. N.MaibierC. (2018). Organizational creativity as an attributional process: The case of Haute Cuisine. Organization Studies, 39, 251–270.
43.
KodeihF.GreenwoodR. (2014). Responding to institutional complexity: The role of identity. Organization Studies, 35, 7–39.
44.
KornbergerM.LeixneringS.MeyerR. E. (2019). The logic of tact: How decisions happen in situations of crisis. Organization Studies, 40, 239–266.
45.
Lengnick-HallC. A.BeckT. E. (2005). Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How organizations respond to environmental change. Journal of Management, 31, 738–757.
46.
LepakD. P.SnellS. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 31–48.
47.
LevesonN.DulacN.MaraisK.CarrollJ. (2009). Moving beyond normal accidents and high reliability organizations: A systems approach to safety in complex systems. Organization Studies, 30, 227–249.
48.
LiebermanM. B.AsabaS. (2006). Why do firms imitate each other?Academy of Management Review, 31, 366–385.
49.
LorinoP.TricardB.ClotY. (2011). Research methods for non-representational approaches to organizational complexity: The dialogical mediated inquiry. Organization Studies, 32, 769–801.
50.
LützhöftM.GrechM. R.PoratheT. (2011). Information environment, fatigue, and culture in the maritime domain. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 7, 280–322.
51.
LynnM. L. (2005). Organizational buffering: Managing boundaries and cores. Organization Studies, 26, 37–61.
52.
MaguireS.McKelveyB.MirabeauL.ÖztasN. (2006). Complexity science and organization studies. The Sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 165–214). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
53.
MarupingL. M.AgarwalR. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 975.
54.
McKagueK.ZietsmaC.OliverC. (2015). Building the social structure of a market. Organization Studies, 36, 1063–1093.
55.
PacheA. C.SantosF. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35, 455–476.
56.
PatalaS.KorpivaaraI.JalkalaA.KuitunenA.SoppeB. (2019). Legitimacy under institutional change: How incumbents appropriate clean rhetoric for dirty technologies. Organization Studies, 40, 395–419.
57.
Pérez-NordtvedtL.PayneG. T.ShortJ. C.KediaB. L. (2008). An entrainment-based model of temporal organizational fit, misfit, and performance. Organization Science, 19, 785–801.
PoulisK.PoulisE. (2016). Problematizing fit and survival: Transforming the law of requisite variety through complexity misalignment. Academy of Management Review, 41, 503–527.
60.
PoulisK.PoulisE. (2018). International business as disciplinary tautology: An ontological perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32, 517–531.
61.
PoulisK.PoulisE.PlakoyiannakiE. (2013). The role of context in case study selection: An international business perspective. International Business Review, 22, 304–314.
62.
RaynardM.KodeihF.GreenwoodR. (2019). Proudly elitist and undemocratic? The distributed maintenance of contested practices. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619874462
63.
RodriguezP.UhlenbruckK.EdenL. (2005). Government corruption and the entry strategies of multinationals. Academy of Management Review, 30, 383–396.
64.
RoundyP. T.BradshawM.BrockmanB. K. (2018). The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach. Journal of Business Research, 86, 1–10.
65.
SchneiderA.WickertC.MartiE. (2017). Reducing complexity by creating complexity: A systems theory perspective on how organizations respond to their environments. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 182–208.
66.
SchreyöggG. (1980). Contingency and choice in organization theory. Organization Studies, 1, 305–326.
67.
SeoM. G.CreedW. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222–247.
68.
SiaS. K.SohC. (2007). An assessment of package–organisation misalignment: Institutional and ontological structures. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 568–583.
69.
SongE. Y. (2019). Protect to damage? Institutional work, unintended consequences and institutional dynamics. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618814564
70.
SpencerJ.GomezC. (2011). MNEs and corruption: The impact of national institutions and subsidiary strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 280–300.
71.
StrongD. M.VolkoffO. (2010). Understanding organization–enterprise system fit: A path to theorizing the information technology artifact. MIS Quarterly, 34, 731–756.
72.
SullD.EisenhardtK. M. (2015). Simple rules: How to thrive in a complex world. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
73.
ThietartR. A.ForguesB. (1995). Chaos theory and organization. Organization Science, 6, 19–31.
74.
TsoukasH.DooleyK. J. (2011). Introduction to the special issue: Towards the ecological style: Embracing complexity in organizational research. Organization Studies, 32, 729–735.
75.
TsoukasH.HatchM. J. (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations, 54, 979–1014.
76.
TynanC.McKechnieS.ChhuonC. (2010). Co-creating value for luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1156–1163.
77.
Uhl-BienM.MarionR.McKelveyB. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298–318.
Van de VenA. H.GancoM.HiningsC. R. (2013). Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 393–440.
VolberdaH. W.van der WeerdtN.VerwaalE.StienstraM.VerduA. J. (2012). Contingency fit, institutional fit, and firm performance: A metafit approach to organization–environment relationships. Organization Science, 23, 1040–1054.
82.
WalkerK.SchlosserF.DeephouseD. L. (2014). Organizational ingenuity and the paradox of embedded agency: The case of the embryonic Ontario solar energy industry. Organization Studies, 35, 613–634.
83.
WeigeltC.SarkarM. B. (2012). Performance implications of outsourcing for technological innovations: Managing the efficiency and adaptability trade-off. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 189–216.
84.
WrightC.NybergD. (2017). An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1633–1661.
85.
YfantopoulosJ. (2008). Pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement reforms in Greece. European Journal of Health Economics, 9, 87–97.
86.
ZacharakisG. (2014). Pharmacies in Greece. Unpublished thesis, Charles University.
