Studies have shown how organisations create and use historical narratives to ‘outpast’ competing narratives, in attempts to claim authenticity through antiquity. We extend this work by exploring how organisations deliberately use historical narratives located in a vaguely defined past as a tool to craft legitimate historical narratives of a common cultural heritage. We theorise a link between strategic ambiguity and historical narratives by explaining how organisational actors construct a vaguely defined past and how historical narratives help these actors invent a cultural heritage. Conducting an in-depth case study of a culinary movement based in Istanbul, Turkey, we identify three forms of ambiguity that enable the construction of a common cultural heritage. These forms include ambiguity of origin, ambiguity of artefacts and ambiguity of ownership, and enable actors to concretise and perform a vaguely defined past in the present. Our study advances understanding of organisational uses of the past and suggests the term ‘strategic historical ambiguity’ to capture how ambiguity is deliberately used as a tool to craft legitimate historical narratives of a common cultural heritage.
AntebyM.MolnárV. (2012). Collective memory meets organizational identity: Remembering to forget in a firm’s rhetorical history. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 515–540.
2.
BojeD. M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 106–126.
3.
ByrkjeflotH.Strandgaard PedersenJ.SvejenovaS. (2013). From label to practice: Creating new Nordic cuisine. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology. Special Issue on Creativity and Innovation in Haute Cuisine, 11, 36–55.
4.
CailluetL.GorgeH.Özçağlar-ToulouseN. (2018). ‘Do not expect me to stay quiet’: Challenges in managing a historical strategic resource. Organization Studies, 39, 1811–1835.
ChreimS. (2005). The continuity–change duality in narrative texts of organizational identity. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 567–593.
7.
ClaflinK. W.ScholliersP. (Eds.) (2013). Writing food history: A global perspective. Oxford: Berg Publications.
8.
CoraiolaD. M.FosterW. M.SuddabyR. (2015). Varieties of history in organization studies. In McLarenP. G.MillsA. J.WeatherbeeT. G. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to management & organizational history (pp. 206–221). New York: Routledge.
9.
DavenportS.LeitchS. (2005). Circuits of power in practice: Strategic ambiguity as delegation of authority. Organization Studies, 26, 1603–1623.
10.
DelmestriG.GreenwoodR. (2016). How Cinderella became a queen: Theorizing radical status change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, 507–550.
11.
DeSouceyM. (2010). Gastronationalism: Food traditions and authenticity politics in the European Union. American Sociological Review, 75, 432–455.
12.
EisenbergE. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227–242.
13.
FlyvbjergB. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245.
14.
FosterW. M.CoraiolaD. M.SuddabyR.KroezenJ.ChandlerD. (2017). The strategic use of historical narratives: A theoretical framework. Business History, 59, 1176–1200.
15.
FosterW. M.SuddabyR.MinkusA.WiebeE. (2011). History as social memory assets: The example of Tim Hortons. Management & Organizational History, 6, 101–120.
Gastronomika (2017). Gastronomika: Anadolu Mutfağını Yeniden Kimliklendirmek. Yaratici Fikirler Enstitusu, Institute of Creative Minds. Retrieved from https://enstitu.com.tr/gastronomika-f2d015034c75.
18.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15–31.
19.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
20.
HatchM. J.SchultzM. (2017). Toward a theory of using history authentically: Historicizing in the Carlsberg Group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62, 657–697.
21.
HillsS.VoronovM.HiningsC. R. B. (2013). Putting new wine in old bottles: Utilizing rhetorical history to overcome stigma associated with a previously dominant logic. In Institutional Logics in Action, Part B (pp. 99–137). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
22.
HobsbawmE.RangerT. (Eds.) (1983/2012). The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.MetzgerM. L.MeyerA. D. (2013). Rekindling the flame: Processes of identity resurrection. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 113–136.
24.
JarzabkowskiP.SillinceJ. A.ShawD. (2010). Strategic ambiguity as a rhetorical resource for enabling multiple interests. Human Relations, 63, 219–248.
25.
KroezeR.KeulenS. (2013). Leading a multinational is history in practice: The use of invented traditions and narratives at AkzoNobel, Shell, Philips and ABN AMRO. Business History, 55, 1265–1287.
26.
KroezenJ. J.HeugensP. P. (2019). What is dead may never die: Institutional regeneration through logic reemergence in Dutch beer brewing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64, 976–1019.
27.
LamertzK.FosterW. M.CoraiolaD. M.KroezenJ. (2016). New identities from remnants of the past: An examination of the history of beer brewing in Ontario and the recent emergence of craft breweries. Business History, 58, 796–828.
28.
LindeC. (2008). Working the past: Narrative and institutional memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
LubinskiC. (2018). From ‘history as told’ to ‘history as experienced’: Contextualizing the uses of the past. Organization Studies, 39, 1785–1809.
30.
MarchJ. G. (2010). The ambiguities of experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31.
MishlerE. G. (1995). Models of narrative analysis: A typology. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5, 87–123.
32.
MordhorstM. (2014). Arla and Danish national identity: Business history as cultural history. Business History, 56, 116–133.
33.
MunslowA. (2016). Narrative works in history. Narrative Works, 6, 108–125.
34.
NoyC. (2007). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 1–18.
35.
OertelS.ThommesK. (2018). History as a source of organizational identity creation. Organization Studies, 39, 1709–1731.
36.
OlickJ. K. (1999). Collective memory: The two cultures. Sociological Theory, 17, 333–348.
PriorL. (2004): Doing things with documents. In SilvermanD. (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 76–94). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
40.
RavasiD.RindovaV.StiglianiI. (2019). The stuff of legend: History, memory, and the temporality of organizational identity construction. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 1523–1555.
41.
ReineckeJ.AnsariS. (2015). When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–648.
42.
ScandeliusC.CohenG. (2016). Achieving collaboration with diverse stakeholders: The role of strategic ambiguity in CSR communication. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3487–3499.
43.
SchultzM.HernesT. (2013). A temporal perspective on organizational identity. Organization Science, 24, 1–21.
StinchcombeA. L. (1965). Organizations and social structure. In MarchJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
47.
SuddabyR.FosterW. M. (2017). History and organizational change. Journal of Management, 43, 19–38.
48.
SuddabyR.FosterW. M.Quinn TrankC. (2010). Rhetorical history as a source of competitive advantage. In BaumJ. A. C.LampelJ. (Eds.), The globalization of strategy research (advances in strategic management) (vol. 27, pp. 147–173). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
49.
SuddabyR.FosterW. M.Quinn TrankC. (2016). ReMembering: Rhetorical history identity work. In PrattM.AshforthB.RavasiD.SchultzM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational identity (pp.297–316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
WadhwaniR. D.SuddabyR.MordhorstM.PoppA. (2018). History as organizing: Uses of the past in organization studies. Organization Studies, 39, 1663–1683.
51.
YbemaS. (2010). Talk of change: Temporal contrasts and collective identities. Organization Studies, 31, 481–503.
52.
ZerubavelE. (2003). Time maps: Collective memory and the social shape of the future. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53.
ZundelM.HoltR.PoppA. (2016). Using history in the creation of organizational identity. Management & Organizational History, 11, 211–235.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
