In this paper we propose that reading and writing with novels contributes to the emerging field of researching affect in organization studies. Situating our argument in current research on work-related uncertainty, we take John Fante’s novel Wait Until Spring, Bandini as a ‘sensuous site’ of research to engage with the experience of feeling stuck – addressed as impasse, limbo or permanent temporariness – as a condition of contemporary work lives. While affect theoretical approaches often emphasize precognitive intensities and their transformative potential, the novel foregrounds how affective intensities stay and stick as they are entangled with powerful socio-political conventions, such as investments in the American Dream or the idea of stable employment. Such affective attachments take shape in antithetic dynamics of the not-so-static state of feeling stuck.
AndersonB. (2016). Neoliberal affects. Progress in Human Geography, 40, 734–753.
2.
AshcraftK. L. (2017). ‘Submission’ to the rule of excellence: Ordinary affect and precarious resistance in the labor of organization and management studies. Organization, 24, 36–58.
3.
AshfordS. J.GeorgeE.BlattR. (2007). Old assumptions, new work: The opportunities and challenges of research on nonstandard employment. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 65–117.
4.
AtkinsonW. (2010). The myth of the reflexive worker: Class and work histories in neo-liberal times. Work, Employment and Society, 24, 413–429.
5.
BamberM.Allen-CollinsonJ.McCormackJ. (2017). Occupational limbo, transitional liminality and permanent liminality: New conceptual distinctions. Human Relations, 70, 1514–1537.
BeyesT.SteyaertC. (2012). Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization, 19, 45–61.
12.
BlackmanL.VennC. (2010). Affect. Body & Society, 16, 7–28.
13.
BristowA.RobinsonS.RatleO. (2017). Being an early-career CMS academic in the context of insecurity and ‘excellence’: The dialectics of resistance and compliance. Organization Studies, 38, 1185–1207.
14.
ButlerJ. (2015). Foreword. In I. Lorey & A. Derieg. State of insecurity: Government of the precarious. London; New York: Verso.
15.
CaseP. (1999). Organizational studies in space: Stanislaw Lem and the writing of social science fiction. Organization, 6, 649–671.
16.
CaseP.GaggiottiH. (2016). Italo Calvino and the organizational imagination: Reading social organization through urban metaphors. Culture and Organization, 22, 178–198.
17.
CollinsonD. L. (2003). Identities and insecurities: Selves at work. Organization, 10, 527–547.
18.
CooperM. (2008). The inequality of security: Winners and losers in the risk society. Human Relations, 61, 1229–1258.
19.
CostasJ. (2013). Problematizing mobility: A metaphor of stickiness, non-places and the kinetic elite. Organization Studies, 34, 1467–1485.
20.
CrombyJ.WillisM. E. H. (2016). Affect – or feeling (after Leys). Theory & Psychology, 26, 476–495.
21.
CostasJ.GreyC. (2014). The temporality of power and the power of temporality: Imaginary future selves in professional service firms. Organization Studies, 35, 909–937.
22.
CzarniawskaB. (2009). Distant readings: Anthropology of organizations through novels. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22, 357–372.
23.
CzarniawskaB.MazzaC. (2003). Consulting as a liminal space. Human Relations, 56, 267–290.
24.
Czarniawska-JoergesB. (1999). Writing management: Organization theory as a literary genre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
De CockC.LandC. (2006). Organization/literature: Exploring the seam. Organization Studies, 27, 517–535.
26.
De CuyperN.de JongJ.De WitteH.IsakssonK.RigottiT.SchalkR. (2008). Literature review of theory and research on the psychological impact of temporary employment: Towards a conceptual model. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 25–51.
27.
DuschinskyR.WilsonE. (2015). Flat affect, joyful politics and enthralled attachments: Engaging with the work of Lauren Berlant. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 28, 179–190.
28.
FanteJ. (2007). Wait until spring, Bandini. Edinburgh: Canongate.
29.
FevreR. (2007). Employment insecurity and social theory: The power of nightmares. Work, Employment & Society, 21, 517–535.
30.
FraherA. L.GabrielY. (2014). Dreaming of flying when grounded: Occupational identity and occupational fantasies of furloughed airline pilots. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 926–951.
31.
FotakiM.KennyK.VachhaniS. J. (2017). Thinking critically about affect in organization studies: Why it matters. Organization, 24, 3–17.
32.
FotakiM.PullenA. (Eds.) (2019). Diversity, affect and embodiment in organizing. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
GabrielY.GrayD. E.GoregaokarH. (2010). Temporary derailment or the end of the line? Managers coping with unemployment at 50. Organization Studies, 31, 1687–1712.
34.
GarstenC. (1999). Betwixt and between: Temporary employees as liminal subjects in flexible organizations. Organization Studies, 20, 601–617.
35.
GherardiS. (2017). One turn . . . and now another one: Do the turn to practice and the turn to affect have something in common?Management Learning, 48, 345–358.
36.
GilmoreS.WagstaffC.SmithJ. (2018). Sports psychology in the English Premier League: ‘It feels precarious and is precarious’. Work, Employment and Society, 32, 426–435.
37.
GreggM.SeigworthG. J. (Eds.) (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
38.
HemmingsC. (2005). Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies, 19, 548–567.
39.
HoltR.ZundelM. (2014). Understanding management, trade, and society through fiction: Lessons from The Wire. Academy of Management Review, 39, 576–585.
40.
JohnsenR.Berg JohansenC.ToyokiS. (2018). Serving time: Organization and the affective dimension of time. Organization, 26, 3–19.
41.
JokinenE. (2016). Precarious everyday agency. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 19), 85–99.
42.
KallebergA. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74, 1–22.
KoeneB.GarstenC.GalaisN. (Eds.) (2014). Management and organization of temporary agency work. New York: Routledge.
45.
KordichC. J. (n.d.). John Fante: His novels and novellas. New York: Twayne Publishers.
46.
LandC.ŚliwaM. (2009). The novel and organization: Introduction from the Editors. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22, 349–356.
47.
LinsteadS. A. (2018). Feeling the reel of the real: Framing the play of critically affective organizational research between art and the everyday. Organization Studies, 39, 319–344.
48.
LohmannP.SteyaertC. (2006). In the meantime: Vitalism, affects and metamorphosis in organisational change. In FuglsangM. (Ed.), Deleuze and the Social (pp. 77–95). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
49.
LorimerH. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 83–94.
50.
MarlerJ. H.Woodard BarringerM.MilkovichG. T. (2002). Boundaryless and traditional contingent employees: Worlds apart. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 425–453.
51.
MassumiB. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, 31, 83–109.
McLeanS. (2017). Fictionalizing anthropology: Encounters and fabulations at the edges of the human. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
54.
MunroI.HuberC. (2012). Kafka’s mythology: Organization, bureaucracy and the limits of sensemaking. Human Relations, 65, 523–543.
55.
OttoB.PorsJ.JohnsenR. (2019). Hidden in full view: The organization of public secrecy in Miéville’s The City and the City. Culture and Organization, 25, 91–103.
56.
ParkerS. K.GriffinM. A.SpriggC. A.WallT. D. (2002). Effect of temporary contracts on perceived work characteristics and job strain: A longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 55, 689–719.
57.
PetriglieriG. (2007). Stuck in a moment: A developmental perspective on impasses. Transactional Analysis Journal, 37, 185–194.
58.
PorsJ. G. (2019). The political and ethical potential of affective resonance between bodies. In FotakiM.PullenA. (Eds.), Diversity, affect and embodiment in organizing (pp. 23–46). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
59.
PorsJ.OttoB.OlaisonL. (2019). Editorial: Ghostly matters in organizing. Ephemera. Theory and Politics of Organization, 19(1), 1–29.
60.
PullenA.RhodesC.ThanemT. (2017). Affective politics in gendered organizations: Affirmative notes on becoming-woman. Organization, 24, 105–123.
61.
PughA. (2015). The tumbleweed society: Working and caring in an age of insecurity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62.
RatnerH.BojesenA.BrammingP. (2014). Lean production of intensive cities: Using the power of Italo Calvino’s imagination to grasp organizational change. Culture and Organization, 20, 77–97.
63.
RippinA. (2009). The illustrated Post Office: A layered account of organisational sexism, brutality and escape. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22, 402–420.
64.
SaloniemiA.ZeytinogluI. U. (2007). Achieving flexibility through insecurity: A comparison of work environments in fixed-term and permanent jobs in Finland and Canada. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 13, 109–128.
65.
SpyridakēsM. (2013). The liminal worker: An ethnography of work, unemployment and precariousness in contemporary Greece. Farnham, UK; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
66.
StewartK. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
67.
SteyaertC. (2015). Three women. A kiss. A life. On the queer writing of time in organization. Gender, Work & Organization, 22, 163–178.
68.
StranglemanT. (2007). The nostalgia for permanence at work? The end of work and its commentators. Sociological Review, 55, 81–103.
69.
StraußA. (forthcoming). Performing hope. In KosteraM.EricssonD. (Eds.), Organising goodness and hope. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
70.
StraußA.FleischmannA. (forthcoming). Reconceptualising solidarity in the social factory: Cultural work between economic needs and political desires. Special issue ‘Solidarities in and through work in an age of extremes’Work, Employment and Society.
71.
ThanemT.WallenbergL. (2015). What can bodies do? Reading Spinoza for an affective ethics of organizational life. Organization, 22, 235–250.
72.
TweedieD. (2013). Making sense of insecurity: A defence of Richard Sennett’s sociology of work. Work, Employment and Society, 27, 94–104.
73.
UmneyC.KretsosL. (2015). That’s the experience: Passion, work precarity, and life transitions among London jazz musicians. Work and Occupations, 42, 313–334.
74.
VijR. (2013). Affective fields of precarity: Gendered antinomies in contemporary Japan. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 38, 122–138.
75.
WetherellM. (2013). Affect and discourse – What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity, 6, 349–368.
76.
WorthN. (2016). Feeling precarious: Millennial women and work. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34, 601–616.
77.
YbemaS.BeechN.EllisN. (2011). Transitional and perpetual liminality: An identity practice perspective. Anthropology Southern Africa, 34, 21–29.
