Research into the creation of markets highlights the importance of law-making, seen to express relations between stakeholders in emerging organizational fields. Less understood is the role of existing regulation, despite related work on path-dependency. We unpack the role of extant laws by analysing consecutive attempts to establish the mortgage market in post-socialist Hungary, mobilizing the anthropology of law and actor-network methods. Based on interviews and archival documents, we find, first, that existing laws exert agency in the market-building process not only through abstract legal ‘traditions’ but through technical features which may resist the market arrangements proposed by political-economic coalitions. Second, the resistance of law can vary based on whether its spokespersons (guardians of legal consistency) become ‘market engineers’ under specific organizational configurations. We theorize this agency with the concept of ‘legal infrastructure’, and show how it acts as a non-human organizer of markets, ensuring compatibility across the economy.
AhleringB.DeakinS. (2007). Labor regulation, corporate governance, and legal origin: A case of institutional complementarity?Law & Society Review, 41, 865–908.
2.
AhrneG.AspersP.BrunssonN. (2015). The organization of markets. Organization Studies, 36, 7–27.
Avent-HoltD. (2012). The political dynamics of market organization: Cultural framing, neoliberalism, and the case of airline deregulation. Sociological Theory, 30, 283–302.
5.
BauerM. W.GaskellG. (2000). Towards public accountability: Beyond sampling, reliability and validity. In GaskellG.BauerM. W. (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook for social research (pp. 336–350). London: SAGE Publications.
6.
BlockF.EvansP. (2005). The state and the economy. In SmelserN.SwedbergR. (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BodzásiB. (2007). Az új Polgári Törvénykönyv Javaslata: Az önálló zálogjog megszüntetése. Polgári Jogi Kodifikáció, 9, 12–26.
8.
BowkerG. C.StarS. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
BrusztL.MairP.ZielonkaJ. (2002). Making markets and eastern enlargement: Diverging convergence?West European Politics, 25, 121–140.
10.
ÇalışkanK.CallonM. (2010). Economization, part 2: A research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39, 1–32.
11.
CallonM. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In LawJ. (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). London: Routledge.
CollierS. (2011). Post-Soviet social: Neoliberalism, social modernity, biopolitics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
CampbellJ. L. (2011). The US financial crisis: Lessons for theories of institutional complementarity. Socio-Economic Review, 9, 211–234.
16.
CarruthersB. G.HallidayT. C. (1998). Rescuing business: The making of corporate bankruptcy law in England and the United States. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17.
CastelleM.MilloY.BeunzaD.LubinD. C. (2016). Where do electronic markets come from? Regulation and the transformation of financial exchanges. Economy and Society, 45, 166–200.
18.
CzarniawskaB. (2008). A theory of organizing. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
19.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 82, 147–160.
20.
DjelicM.-L. (2002). Does Europe mean Americanization? The case of competition. Competition & Change, 6, 233–250.
21.
DjelicM.-L.QuackS. (2007). Overcoming path dependency: Path generation in open systems. Theory and Society, 36, 161–186
22.
DjelicM.-L.QuackS. (Eds.) (2003). Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
23.
DobbinF. (1994). Forging industrial policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the railway age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
DobbinF.DowdT. J. (2000). The market that antitrust built: Public policy, private coercion, and railroad acquisitions, 1825 to 1922. American Sociological Review, 65, 631–657.
ÉliásJ. (2000). A jelzálog-hitelezés szerepe a mezőgazdaság finanszírozásában. PhD diss. Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem.
27.
EngelsA. (2006). Market creation and transnational rule-making: The case of CO2 emissions trading. In DjelicM.-L.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation (pp. 329–348). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
FligsteinN. (1996). Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61, 656–673.
29.
FligsteinN. (2001). The architecture of markets: An economic sociology for the twenty-first century capitalist societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
FligsteinN.Mara-DritaI. (1996). How to make a market: Reflections on the attempt to create a single market in the European Union. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1–33.
31.
FligsteinN.SweetA. S. (2002). Constructing polities and markets: An institutionalist account of European integration. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1206–1243.
32.
GiamporcaroS.GondJ.-P. (2016). Calculability as politics in the construction of markets: The case of socially responsible investment in France. Organization Studies, 37, 465–495.
33.
GiraudeauM. (2010). Performing physiocracy. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3, 225–242.
34.
GrabhamE. (2017). Time and technique: The legal lives of the 26-week qualifying period. Economy and Society, DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2016.1257257.
35.
GreenwoodR.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 27–48.
36.
GulyaA. (1997). A nagy földfedezés: Jelzálog-hitelezés. HVG, 43, 151–152.
37.
HallP. A.SoskiceD. (Eds.) (2001). Varieties of capitalism : The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
HallidayT. C.CarruthersB. G. (2007). The recursivity of law: Global norm making and national lawmaking in the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1135–1202.
39.
HallidayT. C.CarruthersB. G. (2009). Bankrupt: Global lawmaking and systemic financial crisisStanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
HegedűsJ.VárhegyiÉ. (1999). A lakásfinanszírozás válsága a kilencvenes években. Közgazdasági Szemle, 46, 101–120.
42.
HVG. (1998). Az FHB jelzáloglevelei. HVG, 49, 18.
43.
KleinerT. (2003). Building up an asset management industry: Forays of an Anglo-Saxon logic into the French business system. In DjelicM.-L.QuackS. (Eds.), Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game (pp. 57–82). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
44.
Knox-HayesJ. (2010). Creating the carbon market institution: Analysis of the organizations and relationships that build the market. Competition & Change, 41, 176–202.
45.
KornbergerM.PfluegerD.MouritsenJ. (2017). Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 60, 79–95.
46.
Lainer-VosD. (2013). Boundary objects, zones of indeterminacy, and the formation of Irish and Jewish transnational socio-financial networks. Organization Studies, 34, 515–532.
47.
LatourB. (2002). La fabrique du droit. Paris: La Découverte.
48.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
LatourB. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
LawJ.HassardJ. (Eds.) (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
LounsburyM. (2008). Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 349–361.
52.
MacKenzieD. (2009). Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 440–455.
53.
MatlandR. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5, 145–174.
54.
McLeanC.HassardJ. (2004). Symmetrical absence/symmetrical absurdity: Critical notes on the production of actor-network accounts. Journal of Management Studies, 2, 493–519.
55.
MillerP.RoseN. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19, 1–31.
56.
MilyaevaS. (2014). Tipping the balance: Russian legal culture and cash-settled derivatives. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7, 209–225.
MölleringG. (2009). Market constitution analysis: A new framework applied to solar power technology markets. MPIfG Working Paper, 09(7). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1456833
Nasarre-AznarS.StöckerO. (2005). Covered bonds in Europe. In RobbéJ. J. d. V.AliP. U. (Eds.), Securitisation of derivatives and alternative asset classes: Yearbook 2005 (pp. 167–206). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
61.
PappM. (2005). A jelzáloglevél alapú finanszírozás helyzete Magyarországon pénzügyi stabilitási szempontból: MNB Műhelytanulmányok No.36.
PottageA. (2012). The materiality of what?Journal of Law & Society, 39, 167–183.
64.
PottageA. (2014). Law after anthropology: Object and technique in Roman law. Theory, Culture & Society, 31, 147–166.
65.
PowerM. (2015). How accounting begins: Object formation and the accretion of infrastructure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 47, 43–55.
66.
QuackS. (2007). Legal professionals and transnational law-making: A case of distributed agency. Organization, 14, 643–666.
67.
QuackS.DjelicM.-L. (2005). Adaptation, recombination, and reinforcement : The story of antitrust and competition law in Germany and Europe. In StreeckW.ThelenK. (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 255–281). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68.
RaoH. (1998). Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 912–961.
69.
RilesA. (2005). A new agenda for the cultural study of law: Taking on the technicalities. Buffalo Law Review, 53, 973–1033.
70.
RilesA. (2010). Collateral expertise: Legal knowledge in the global financial markets. Current Anthropology, 51, 795–818.
71.
SchneibergM.BartleyT. (2001). Regulating American industries: Markets, politics, and the institutional determinants of fire insurance regulation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 101–146.
72.
ScottW. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
73.
SpencerJ. W.MurthaT. P.LenwayS. A. (2005). How governments matter to new industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 30, 321–337.
74.
StarS. L. (2002). Infrastructure and ethnographic practice: Working on the fringes. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 14, 107–122.
75.
StarS. L.GriesemerJ. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals on Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
76.
StrykerR. (2003). Mind the gap: Law, institutional analysis and socioeconomics. Socio-Economic Review, 1, 335–367.
77.
SzalayG.GyulaT. (2003). The finance of home purchases and construction, the risks involved and their management in the Hungarian banking system. Report on Financial Stability (pp. 100–116): Central Bank of Hungary.
78.
UslanerE. M.ZittelT. (2009). Comparative legislative behavior. In GoodinR. E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79.
VinczeJ. (2002). A jelzáloglevelek piaci helyzete és fejlődési irányai. Hitelintézeti Szemle, 1, 61–80.
80.
WhittleA.SpicerA. (2008). Is actor network theory critique?Organization Studies, 29, 611–629.
81.
WinnerL. (1999). Do artifacts have politics? In MacKenzieD.WajckmanJ. (Eds.), The social shaping of technology (2nd ed., pp. 28–40). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
82.
WootenM.HoffmanA. J. (2017). Organizational fields: Past, present and future. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.LawrenceT. B.MeyerR. E. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications.
