In this essay, we explore the notions of ‘post-truth’ and ‘alternative facts’ for management studies. Adopting a pragmatist perspective, we argue that there is no intrinsically accurate language in terms of which to refer to reality. Language, rather, is a tool that enables agents to grab hold of causal forces and intervene in the world. ‘Alternative facts’ can be created by multimodal communication to highlight different aspects of the world for the purpose of political mobilization and legitimacy. ‘Post-truth’ politics reveals the fragmentation of the language game in which mainstream politics has been hitherto conducted. Using the communicative acts of businessman-turned-politician President Trump and his aides, as a prompt, we explore the implications that ‘alternative facts’ and ‘post-truth’ have for today’s management scholarship. We argue that management scholars should unpack how managers navigate strategic action and communication, and how the creation of alternative realities is accomplished in conditions of informational abundance and multimodal communication.
BlackburnS. (2017). Truth: Ideas in profile. London: Profile Books.
7.
BloomP.RhodesC. (2018). The CEO society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BoczkowskiP. J.OrlikowskiW. J. (2004). Organizational discourse and new media: A practice perspective. In GrantD.HardyC.OswickC.PutnamL. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 359–377). London: SAGE Publications.
9.
BolmanL. G.DealT. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
BrownA. D.JonesM. (2000). Honourable members and dishonourable deeds: Sensemaking, impression management and legitimation in the ‘Arms to Iraq Affair’. Human Relations, 53, 655–689.
11.
CaputoJ. D. (2013). Truth: Philosophy in transit. London: Penguin.
12.
d’AnconaM. (2017). Post-truth: The new war on truth and how to fight back. London: Random House.
13.
DavisE. (2017). Post-truth: Why we have reached peak bullshit and what we can do about it. London: Little Brown Book Group.
FrankfurtH. G. (2009). On bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
FuchsC. (2018). Digital demagogue: Authoritarian capitalism in the age of Trump and Twitter. London: Pluto Press.
18.
GabrielY. (2004). Narratives, stories and texts. In GrantG.HardyC.OswickC.PutnamL. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 61–78). London: SAGE Publications.
GondJ. P.CabantousL.HardingN.LearmonthM. (2016). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18, 440–463.
HaackS. (1995). Evidence and inquiry: Towards reconstruction in epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
HarveyW. S.TourkyM.KnightE.KitchenP. (2017). Lens or prism? How organisations sustain multiple and competing reputations. European Journal of Marketing, 51, 821–844.
KnightE. (2013). Why we argue about climate change. Melbourne: Black Inc.
32.
KnightE.ParoutisS.HeracleousL. (2018). The power of PowerPoint: A visual perspective on meaning making in strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 894–921.
33.
MaguireS.HardyC. (2013). Organizing processes and the construction of risk: A discursive approach. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 231–255.
34.
ManghamI. L.OveringtonM. A. (1987). Organizations as theatre: A social psychology of dramatic appearances. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
MarchJ. G. (2010). The ambiguities of experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
McDonnellM.-H.KingB. (2013). Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 387–419.
38.
NagelT. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Oxford English Dictionary (June2017). Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). OED Online: Oxford University Press.
RhodesC. (2016). Democratic business ethics: Volkswagen’s emissions scandal and the disruption of corporate sovereignty. Organization Studies, 37, 1501–1518.
44.
RindovaV. P.PollockT. G.HaywardM. L. (2006). Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review, 31, 50–71.
45.
RindovaV. P.WilliamsonI. O.PetkovaA. P.SeverJ. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1033–1049.
46.
RortyR. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
RortyR. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
SandbergJ.TsoukasH. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36, 338–360.
49.
SearleJ. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
SearleJ. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
51.
SearleJ. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
SianoA.VolleroA.ConteF.AmabileS. (2017). ‘More than words’: Expanding the taxonomy of greenwashing after the Volkswagen scandal. Journal of Business Research, 71, 27–37.
SpinosaC.FloresF.DreyfusH. L. (1997). Disclosing new worlds: Entrepreneurship, democratic action, and the cultivation of solidarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
TrumpD. (2017b). Remarks by President Trump at the Conservative Political Action Conference. Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center: The White House Office of the Press Secretary.
63.
TsoukasH. (1999). David and Goliath in the risk society: Making sense of the conflict between Shell and Greenpeace in the North Sea. Organization, 6, 499–528.
WenzelM.KochJ. (2018). Strategy as staged performance: A critical discursive perspective on keynote speeches as a genre of strategic communication. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 639–663.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
