This study examines the phenomenon of ‘liberating leadership’, an emerging trend promising self-mastery and collective unity, resonating with the literature on post-heroic leadership. We evaluate the claims of liberating leadership from a psychodynamic perspective, using a Lacanian approach. We examine how post-heroic forms of leadership reconfigure symbolic and imaginary aspects of follower identification, with ambivalent effects. Drawing empirically on the case of a Belgian banking department, we trace how a ‘liberating’ leader was able to garner intense psychological attachment among followers, accompanied by the ‘dark sides’ of personal exhaustion and breakdown, normative pressure to be overly happy, and the scapegoating of contrarian managers representing symbolic prohibition.
ArnaudG. (2002). The organization and the symbolic: Organizational dynamics viewed from a Lacanian perspective. Human Relations, 55, 691–716.
2.
ArnaudG. (2012). The contribution of psychoanalysis to organization studies and management: An overview. Organization Studies, 33, 1121–1135.
3.
ArnaudG.VidailletB. (2018). Clinical and critical: The Lacanian contribution to management and organization studies. Organization, 25, 69–97.
4.
ArnaudN.MillsC. E.LegrandC. (2016). Liberation through narrativity: A case of organization reconstruction through strategic storytelling. Management International, 20, 107–118.
5.
AvolioB. J.WalumbwaF. O.WeberT. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–449.
6.
BaldryC.BainP.TaylorP.HymanJ.ScholariosD.MarksA.WatsonA.GilbertK.BunzelD.GallG. (2007). The meaning of work in the new economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BeyerJ. M. (1999). Taming and promoting charisma to change organizations. Leadership, 10, 307–330.
8.
BöhmS.BattaA. (2010). Just doing it: Enjoying commodity fetishism with Lacan. Organization, 17, 345–361.
9.
ChaumonF. (2004). Lacan. La loi, le sujet, la jouissance. Paris: Editions Michalon.
10.
CollinsonM. (2018). Leading questions: What’s new about Leadership-as-Practice?Leadership, 14, 363–370.
11.
CollinsonD. (2012). Prozac leadership and the limits of positive thinking. Leadership, 8, 87–107.
12.
ContuA.DriverM.JonesC. (2010). Jacques Lacan with organization studies. Organization, 17, 307–315.
13.
CostasJ.TaheriA. (2012). ‘The return of the primal father’ in postmodernity? A Lacanian analysis of authentic leadership. Organization Studies, 33, 1195–1216.
14.
De CockC.BöhmS. (2007). Liberalist fantasies: Žižek and the impossibility of the open society. Organization, 14, 815–836.
15.
DemaillyL. (2011). Les nouveaux managements et la question de l’autonomie professionnelle. L’information psychiatrique, 87(6), 467–474.
16.
DenisJ. L.LangleyA.SergiV. (2012). Leadership in the plural. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 211–283.
17.
DriverM. (2013). The lack of power or the power of lack in leadership as a discursively constructed identity. Organization Studies, 34, 407–422.
18.
EndrissatN.IslamG.NoppeneyC. (2015). Enchanting work: New spirits of service work in an organic supermarket. Organization Studies, 36, 1555–1576.
19.
Eslen-ZiyaH.ErhartI. (2015). Toward postheroic leadership: A case study of Gezi’s collaborating multiple leaders. Leadership, 11, 471–488.
20.
FaurouxM.NiewenglowskiM.MongellazT.TupinD.RousseauA.CohenA. (2015). ‘J’ai viré mon chef’ (I fired my boss), Complément d’enquête [TV documentary]. France: France Télévisions.
21.
FaÿE. (2008). Derision and management. Organization, 15, 831–850.
22.
FinemanS. (2006). On being positive: Concerns and counterpoints. Academy of Management Review, 31, 270–291.
23.
FletcherJ. K. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 647–661.
24.
FlemingP. (2009). Authenticity and the cultural politics of work: New forms of informal control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
FlemingP.SturdyA. (2011). ‘Being yourself’ in the electronic sweatshop: New forms of normative control. Human Relations, 64, 177–200.
26.
FordJ.HardingN. (2011). The impossibility of the ‘true self’ of authentic leadership. Leadership, 7, 463–479.
27.
FordJ.HardingN. (2015). Followers in leadership theory: fiction, fantasy and illusion. Leadership (Online First).
28.
GabrielY. (1997). Meeting God: When organizational members come face to face with the supreme leader. Human Relations, 50, 315–342.
29.
GabrielY.CarrA. (2002). Organizations, management and psychoanalysis: An overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 348–365.
30.
GemmillG.OakleyJ. (1992). Leadership: An alienating social myth?Human Relations, 45, 113–129.
31.
GetzI. (2009). Liberating leadership: How the initiative-freeing radical organizational form has been successfully adopted. California Management Review, 51(4), 32–58.
32.
GetzI. (2011). 1960s’ lessons learned: Liberating leadership and transformational scholarship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 8–12.
33.
GetzI.CarneyB. M. (2009). Freedom, Inc. New York City: Crown Business.
34.
GilbertP.Raulet-CrozetN.TeglborgC. (2014). Figures du client et management : un processus de structuration sous contrôle(s). Gérer & Comprendre, 118, 67–77.
35.
GrintK. (2010). The sacred in leadership: Separation, sacrifice and silence. Organization Studies, 31, 89–107.
36.
HoltzT. (2017). Mutations du leadership dans une entreprise en voie de libération. RIPCO, 23(2), 125–140.
37.
IslamG. (2014). Identities and ideals: Psychoanalytic dialogues of self and leadership. Leadership, 10, 344–360.
38.
JaumierS. (2017). Preventing chiefs from being chiefs: An ethnography of a co-operative sheet-metal factory. Organization, 24, 218–239.
39.
JohnsenR.Gudmand-HøyerM. (2010). Lacan and the lack of humanity in HRM. Organization, 17, 331–344.
40.
KellyS. (2014). Towards a negative ontology of leadership. Human Relations, 67, 905–922.
41.
KennyK. (2012). ‘Someone big and important’: Identification and affect in an international development organization. Organization Studies, 33, 1175–1193.
42.
KosmalaK.HerrbachO. (2006). The ambivalence of professional identity: On cynicism and jouissance in audit firms. Human Relations, 59, 1393–1428.
43.
LacanJ. (1998). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (Seminar IX). Trans. A. Sheridan, ed. Miller.J.-A.London: Vintage.
44.
LacanJ. (2006). Ecrits. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
45.
LandivarD.TrouvéP. (2017). Eprouver les entreprises libérées. Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels, 23, 47–61.
46.
LeonardP. (2007). The romance of collaborative leadership. British Academy of Management Conference. Warwick University.
47.
MeindlJ. R.EhrlichS. B.DukerichJ. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78.
48.
MeissonnierM. (2014). Le Bonheur au Travail [TV]. Arte/Campagne Première.
49.
MüllerM. (2012). Lack and jouissance in hegemonic discourse of identification with the state. Organization, 20, 279–298.
50.
OwensC. (2010). Danger! Neurotics at work. In CederströmC.HoedemaekersC. (Eds.), Lacan and organization (pp. 187–210). London: MayFly Books.
51.
ParkerI. (2005). Lacanian discourse analysis in psychology: Seven theoretical elements. Theory & Psychology, 15(2), 163–182.
SchedlitzkiD.EdwardsG.KempsterS. (2017). The absent follower: Identity construction within organisationally assigned leader–follower relations. Leadership (Online first).
59.
SemlerR. (1993). Maverick: The success story behind the world’s most unusual workplace. New York: Warner Books.
60.
StavrakakisY. (2007). The Lacanian Left: Psychoanalysis, theory, politics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
61.
StavrakakisY. (2008). Subjectivity and the organized other: Between symbolic authority and fantasmatic enjoyment. Organization Studies, 29, 1037–1059.
62.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: SAGE Publications.
63.
SutherlandN.LandC.BöhmS. (2014). Anti-leaders(hip) in social movement organizations: The case of autonomous grassroots groups. Organization, 21, 759–781.
64.
VanheuleS.LievrouwA.VerhaegheP. (2003). Burnout and intersubjectivity: A psychoanalytical study from a Lacanian perspective. Human Relations, 56, 321–338.
65.
VerhaegheP. (2000). The collapse of the function of the father and its effect on gender roles. In R. Salecl, Sexuation (pp. 131–154). Durham, London: Duke University Press.
66.
VerhezenP. (2010). Giving voice in a culture of silence. From a culture of compliance to a culture of integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 187–206.
67.
VidailletB.GamotG. (2015). Working and resisting when one’s workplace is under threat of being shut down: A Lacanian perspective. Organization Studies, 36, 987–1011.
68.
VinceR.MazenA. (2014). Violent innocence: A contradiction at the heart of leadership. Organization Studies, 35, 189–207.
69.
ŽižekS. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
70.
ŽižekS. (2000). The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London: Verso.
71.
ŽižekS. (2009). Violence: Six sideways reflections. London: Profile Books.
