AlbyF.ZucchermaglioC. (2006). ‘Afterwards we can understand what went wrong, but now let’s fix it’: How situated work practices shape group decision making. Organization Studies, 27, 943–966.
2.
BecharaA.DamasioA. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336–372.
3.
BecharaA.DamasioH.TranelD.DamasioA. R. (2005). The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: Some questions and answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 159–162.
4.
BillingerS.StieglitzN.SchumacherT. R. (2013). Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study. Organization Science, 25, 93–108.
5.
CabantousL.GondJ-P.Johnson-CramerM. (2010). Decision theory as practice: Crafting rationality in organizations. Organization Studies, 31, 1531–1566.
6.
CohenM. D.BacdayanP. (1994). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 5, 554–568.
7.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
DruckmanJ. N.KamC. D. (2009). Students as experimental participants: A defense of the ‘narrow data base’. UPR-WP-09-05. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Institute for Policy Research.
9.
DrummondH. (1994). Too little too late: A case study of escalation in decision making. Organization Studies, 15, 591–607.
10.
ExadaktylosF.EspínA. M.Branas-GarzaP. (2013). Experimental subjects are not different. Scientific reports3.
11.
HuberL. R.SloofR.Van PraagM. (2017). The effect of incentives on sustainable behavior: Evidence from a field experiment. Labour Economics, 45, 92–106.
12.
Laureiro-MartínezD.CanessaN.BrusoniS.et al. (2014). Frontopolar cortex and decision-making efficiency: Comparing brain activity of experts with different professional background during an exploration-exploitation task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 927.
13.
Laureiro-MartínezD.BrusoniS.CanessaN.ZolloM. (2015). Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 319–338.
14.
LevineS. S.BernardM.NagelR. (2017). Strategic intelligence: The cognitive capability to anticipate competitor behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 2390–2423.
15.
LindebaumD.PéreztsM.AnderssonL. (2017). Why books? Editorial. Organization Studies. First published 25 October. DOI: 10.1177/0170840617740068
16.
LipshitzR.KleinG.CarrollJ. S. (2006). Introduction to the special issue. Naturalistic decision making and organizational decision making: Exploring the intersections. Organization Studies, 27, 917–923.
17.
MeyerR. J.ShiY. (1995). Sequential choice under ambiguity: Intuitive solutions to the armed-bandit problem. Management Science, 41, 817–834.
18.
PetersonR. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450–461.
19.
PoppaT.BecharaA. (2018). The somatic marker hypothesis: Revisiting the role of the ‘body-loop’ in decision-making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 61–66.
20.
SanfeyA. G.RillingJ. K.AronsonJ. A.NystromL. E.CohenJ. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300, 1755–1758.
21.
SutcliffeK. M.BrownA. D.PutnamL. L. (2006). Introduction to the special issue ‘Making sense of organizing: In honor of Karl Weick’. Organization Studies, 27, 1573–1578.
22.
WeickK. E. (2006). Faith, evidence, and action: Better guesses in an unknowable world. Organization Studies, 27, 1723–1736.
