Extant organizational research into crises has focused on the efforts of different actors to defend and legitimate their ideologies towards particular actions. Although insightful, such research has offered little knowledge about the moral reasoning underlying such action. In this paper, we explore how moral reasoning from different ideological viewpoints can lead to polarized debates and stalemate within the context of ecological crises. We apply our conceptual framework in an analysis of the 19th century French phylloxera epidemic. Drawing upon this analysis, we argue that, by adapting their moral reasoning, opposing stakeholder groups could maintain their underlying ideology, while at the same time pragmatically changing their actions towards the crisis. We discuss the theoretical implications of our analysis for historical research in organizational studies and research on organizations and the natural environment.
AllanK. (2001). Natural Language Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
2.
AlvessonM.WilmottH. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 619–644.
3.
BarleyS. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108.
4.
BarrettM.HeracleousL.WalshamG. (2013). A rhetorical approach to IT diffusion: Reconceptualizing the ideology-framing relationship in computerization movements. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 201–220.
5.
BarthesR. (1983). Mythologies (LaversA. Trans.). New York: Hill & Wang.
6.
BazilleG. (1868). Sur la nouvelle maladie de la vigne en provence (BarralJ. A. Ed. Vol. 49). Paris: Bureaux du Journal.
7.
BellD. (1962). The end of ideology (2nd rev. ed. ed.). New York: Collier Books.
8.
BernardiR.ConstantinidesP.NandhakumarJ. (2017). Challenging dominant frames in policies for IS innovation in healthcare through rhetorical strategies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18(2), 81–112.
9.
BoinA.‘t HartP.McConnellA. (2009). Crisis exploitation: Political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 16, 81–106.
10.
BoykoffM. T. (2007). Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area, 39, 470–481.
11.
CampbellC. (2004). Phylloxera: How wine was saved for the world. London: Harper.
12.
CazalisF. (1869). De la maladie de la vigne causée par le Phylloxéra. Le Messager Agricole, 9.
13.
ClarkP.RowlinsonM. (2004). The treatment of history in organisation studies: Towards an ‘historic turn’?Business History, 46, 331–352.
14.
CohenH. (1961). The evolution of the concept of disease. In LushB. (Ed.), Concepts of medicine (pp. 159–169). Oxford: Pergamon.
15.
Commission Supérieure du Phylloxera. Sessions de Année 1879–1882. Paris: Imp. Nationale. Published 1883.
16.
CornelissenJ. (2005). Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 30, 741–764.
17.
CornelissenJ.HoltR.ZundelM. (2011). The role of analogy and metaphor in the framing and legitimation of strategic change. Organization Studies, 32, 1701–1716.
18.
de CerisA. (1873). Chronique agricole. Journal d’agriculture pratique, 37, 673–676.
19.
de ChervilleG. (1878). La vie a la campagne – 26 Août. Le Temps, pp. 3–4.
20.
DesmondA.MooreJ. R. (1992). Darwin. London: Penguin.
21.
DiamondJ. M. (2006). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. London: Penguin.
22.
DonaganA. (1979). The theory of morality: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
EchiksonW. (2005). Noble rot. New York: W. W. Norton.
24.
EdgellP. (2012). A cultural sociology of religion: New directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 247–265.
25.
ErkamaN.VaaraE. (2010). Struggles over legitimacy in global organizational restructuring: A rhetorical perspective on legitimation strategies and dynamics in a shutdown case. Organization Studies, 31, 813–839.
26.
FaircloughN.MulderrigJ.WodakR. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In van DijkT. A. (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd edition) (pp. 357–378). London: SAGE Publications.
27.
FeldmanR. M.FeldmanS. P. (2006). What links the chain: An essay on organizational remembering as practice. Organization, 13, 861–887.
28.
FordC. C. (2005). Divided houses: Religion and gender in modern France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
FourcadeM. (2012). The vile and the noble. Sociological Quarterly, 53, 524–545.
30.
GaleG. (1979). Theory of science: An introduction to the history, logic, and philosophy of science. New York: McGraw Hill.
31.
GaleG. (2003). Saving the vine from phylloxera: A never-ending battle. In SandlerM.PindlerR. (Eds.), Wine: A scientific exploration (pp. 70–91). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
GaleG. (2011). Dying on the vine: How phylloxera transformed wine. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
GarrierG. (1984). Vignerons du Beaujolais au siècle dernier: Vigne et vignerons dans la France ancienne. Paris: Horvath.
35.
GarrierG. (1989). Le Phylloxéra: Une guerre de trent ans, 1870–1900. Paris: Albin Michel.
GerwirthA. (1982). Human rights: Essays on justifications and applications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
GiddensA. (2009). The politics of climate change: National responses to the challenge of global warming. London: Policy Network.
39.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
40.
GoldenB. R. (1992). The past is the past – or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 848–860.
HargadonA. B.DouglasY. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476–501.
43.
HeggelundG. (2007). China’s climate change policy: Domestic and international developments. Asian Perspective, 31, 155–191.
44.
HeracleousL. (2006). A tale of three discourses: The dominant, the strategic and the marginalized. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1059–1087.
45.
HeracleousL.BarrettM. (2001). Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 755–778.
46.
HoffmanA. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351–371.
47.
HulmeM. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
JermierJ. M.ForbesL. C. (2011). Metaphor as the foundation of organization studies: Images of Organization and beyond. Organization Environment, 24, 444–458.
49.
JermierJ. M.ForbesL. C.BennS.OrsatoR. J. (2006). The new corporate environmentalism and green politics. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd edition) (pp. 618–650). London: SAGE Publications.
50.
JohnsonM. (1994). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
KallioT. J.NordbergP. (2006). The evolution of organizations and natural environment discourse: Some critical remarks. Organization Environment, 19, 439–457.
52.
KantI. (1996). Kant: The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
KerryJ.GrahamL. (2009). Yes we can (pass climate change legislation). New York Times, October10, 2009, p. 11.
54.
KieserA. (1994). Why organization theory needs historical analyses – and how this should be performed. Organization Science, 5, 608–620.
55.
KirbyE. L.HarterL. M. (2003). Speaking the language of the bottom-line: The metaphor of ‘managing diversity’. Journal of Business Communication, 40, 28–49.
56.
LakoffG. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
LakoffG. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communications, 4, 70–81.
58.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1985). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
60.
LatourB. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Trans. SheridanAlanLawJohn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
LeachM.ScoonesI.StirlingA. (2010). Governing epidemics in an age of complexity: Narratives, politics and pathways to sustainability. Global Environmental Change, 20, 369–377.
62.
LeiserowitzA. A. (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous?Risk Analysis, 25, 1433–1442.
63.
LowenthalD. (1985). The past is a foreign country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
MargadantT. W. (1979). French rural society in the nineteenth century: A review essay. Agricultural History, 53, 644–641.
65.
MarstonG. (2000). Metaphor, morality and myth: A critical discourse analysis of public housing policy in Queensland. Critical Social Policy, 20, 349–373.
66.
MassengillR. P. (2008). Prayers of the people: Moral metaphors in the right-to-life and faith-based labor movements. Poetics, 36, 338–357.
67.
McAdamsD. P.AlbaughM.FarberE.DanielsJ.LoganR. L.OlsonB. (2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 978–990.
68.
MorganG. (1986). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
69.
MudgeK.JanickJ.ScofieldS.GoldschmidtE. E. (2009). A history of grafting (Vol. 35). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
70.
MuellerF.SillinceJ. A. A.HarveyC.HowarthC. (2004). ‘A rounded picture is what we need’: Rhetorical strategies, arguments, and the negotiation of change in a UK hospital trust. Organization Studies, 25, 75–93.
71.
NordhausW. D.BoyerJ. G. (1999). Requiem for Kyoto: An economic analysis of the Kyoto Protocol. The Energy Journal, January, 93–130.
72.
OliverP.JohnstonH. (2000). What a good idea! Ideologies and frames in social movement research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5(1), 37–54.
73.
OrdishG. (1987). The great wine blight. London: Pan Macmillan.
74.
PaulH. W. (1997). Reinventing the vine: Science, vine and wine in modern France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75.
PellingM. (1993). Contagion/germ theory/specificity. In BynumW. F.PorterR. (Eds.), Companion encyclopedia of the history of medicine (pp. 309–334). London: Routledge.
76.
PettigrewA. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change theory and practice. Organization Science, 1, 267–292.
77.
PhillipsR. A.ReichartJ. (2000). The environment as a stakeholder? A fairness based approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 185–197.
78.
PitteJ.-R. (2008). Bordeaux/Burgundy: A vintage rivalry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
79.
PlanchonJ. É. (1874). Le Phylloxéra en Europe et en Amérique. Revue de Deux Mondes, 1–2, 546–566.
80.
PougetR. (1990). Histoire de la lutte contre le phylloxéra de la vigne en France: 1868–1895. Paris: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.
81.
PurvisT.HuntA. (1993). Discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology. British Journal of Sociology, 44, 473–499.
82.
RawlsJ. (2009). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83.
RobinsonJ. (2006). The Oxford companion to wine (3rd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84.
RoschE. H.LloydB. B. (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale: Erlbaum & J. Wiley.
85.
Samra-FredericksD. (2004). Managerial elites making rhetorical and linguistic ‘moves’ for a moving (emotional) display. Human Relations, 57, 1103–1143.
SimpsonJ. (2011). Creating wine: The emergence of a world industry, 1840–1914. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
88.
SmithW. K.LewisM. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.
89.
SorensonC. W.SmithE. H.SmithJ.CartonY. (2008). Charles V. Riley, France and Phylloxera. American Entomologist, 54, 134–149.
90.
SteadJ. G.SteadW. E. (2009). Management for a small planet. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
91.
StevensonI. (1980). The diffusion of disaster: The phylloxera outbreak in the department of the Herault, 1862–1880. Journal of Historical Geography, 6, 47–63.
92.
SuddabyR.FosterW. M.MillsA. J. (2014). Historical institutionalism. In BucheliM.WadhwaniR. D. (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, methods (pp. 100–123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
TaylorJ. R. (2003). Linguistic categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95.
ThompsonJ. B. (1985). Studies in the theory of ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
96.
TsoukasH. (1991). The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Academy of Management Review, 16, 566–585.
97.
VaaraE.TienariJ. (2002). Justification, legimitation and naturalization of mergers and acquisitions: A critical discourse analysis of media texts. Organization, 9, 275–304.
98.
VaaraE.TienariJ. (2008). A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 985–993.
99.
Van de VenA. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590–607.
100.
van DijkT. A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In SchäffneC.WendenA. L. (Eds.), Language and peace. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
101.
van DijkT. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17, 359–383.
102.
WaddockS. (2011). We are all stakeholders of Gaia now: A normative perspective on stakeholder thinking. Organization & Environment, 24, 192–212.
103.
WadhwaniR. D.BucheliM. (2014). The future of the past in management and organizational studies. In BucheliM.WadhwaniR. D. (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, methods (pp. 3–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
104.
WeberE. (1979). Peasants into Frenchmen: The modernisation of rural France, 1870–1914. London: Chatto & Windus.
