CarrollA. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.
2.
DavisG. F. (2013). After the corporation. Politics & Society, 41, 283–308.
3.
DonaldsonT.PrestonL. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
4.
EtzioniA. (1988). The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: The Free Press.
5.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic planning: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
6.
FreemanR. E.WicksA. C.ParmarB. (2004). Stakeholder theory and ‘the corporate objective revisited’. Organization Science, 15, 364–369.
7.
GraeberD. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
JensenM. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 235–256.
9.
JonesT. M. (1983). An integrating framework for research in business and society: A step toward the elusive paradigm?Academy of Management Review, 8, 559–564.
10.
LieJ. (1997). Sociology of markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 341–360.
11.
OrlitzkyM. (2015). The politics of corporate social responsibility or why Milton Friedman has been right all along. Annals in Social Responsibility, 1, 5–29.
12.
SchererA. G.PalazzoG. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.
13.
SundaramA. K.InkpenA. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15, 350–363.