Most scholarship in modern organization theory maintains a near-exclusive focus on private-sector settings. In contrast, this article argues that complex public-sector organizational systems – such as the European Union (EU) – can provide a very relevant laboratory to both fine-tune organization theoretical propositions and test them empirically. I first draw attention to the value-added of organization theory for the study of EU institutions. Then, I turn to these institutions’ capacity to present a springboard for theoretical development in organization theory, and bring forward a number of avenues for further research on the intersection of EU studies and organization theory that can push forward both research fields.
AhrneG.BrunssonN. (2008). Meta-organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
2.
AhrneG.BrunssonN. (2010). How much do meta-organizations affect their members?Paper presented at SGIR 7th Pan-European International Relations Conference, Stockholm, 9–11 September 2010.
3.
Anderfuhren-BigetS.HäfligerU.HugS. (2013). The values of staff in international organizations. In ReinaldaB. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of international organization. New York: Routledge.
4.
AndrewsD. M. (2012). The rise and fall of EU studies in the USA. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 755–775.
5.
Arellano-GaultD.DemortainD.RouillardC.ThoenigJ-C. (2013). Bringing public organization and organizing back in. Organization Studies, 34, 145–167.
6.
AxelrodR. (2014). How political science can enrich other disciplines. Scandinavian Political Studies, 37, 82–93.
7.
BallD.Garcia-LorenzoL. (2013). A very personal process: Dealing with post-merger cultural change in a financial services institution. Change Management, 12(1), 1–16.
8.
BanC. R. (2013). Management and culture in an enlarged European Commission. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BarnettM. N.FinnemoreM. (1999). The politics, power and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53, 699–732.
10.
BátoraJ. (2010). Book Review: Governing through Institution Building: Institutional Theory and Recent European Experiments in Democratic Organization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 24, 625–629.
11.
BattilanaJ.LecaB.BoxenbaumE. (2009). Agency and institutions: A review of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65–107.
12.
BauerM. W. (2008). Diffuse anxieties, deprived entrepreneurs: Commission reform and middle management. Journal of European Public Policy, 15, 691–707.
13.
BauerM. W.EgeJ. (2012). Politicization within the European Commission’s bureaucracy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78, 403–424.
14.
BellamyR.CastiglioneD. (2003). Legitimizing the Euro-polity and its regime: The normative turn in EU studies. European Journal of Political Theory, 2(1), 7–34.
15.
BevirM. (2011). Governance as theory, practice and dilemma. In BevirM. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of governance. London: SAGE Publications.
16.
BeyersJ. (2005). Multiple embeddedness and socialization in Europe: The case of council officials. International Organization, 59, 899–936.
17.
BeyersJ. (2010). Conceptual and methodological challenges in the study of European socialization. Journal of European Public Policy, 17, 909–920.
18.
BlauP.ScottR. (1962). Formal organizations: A comparative approach. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing.
19.
BoalK. B.SchultzP. (2007). Storytelling, time, and evolution: The role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 411–428.
20.
BordiaP.HobmanE.JonesE.GalloisC.CallanV. J. (2004). Uncertainty during organizational change: Types, consequences, and management strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 507–532.
21.
CaporasoJ. A. (1996). The European Union and forms of state: Westphalian, regulatory or post-modern?Journal of Common Market Studies, 34, 29–52.
22.
ChristensenT.LægreidP.RonessP. G.RøvikK. A. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. London: Routledge.
23.
Commission of the European Communities (2000). Reforming the Commission. A White Paper – Parts I and II, COM (2000) 200 final/2. European Commission, 5April2000.
24.
CowlesM. G.CaporasoJ. A.Risse-KappenT. (2001). Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change. New York: Cornell University Press.
25.
CzarniawskaB.SevonG. (2005). Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in the global economy. Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
26.
De NeveJ. E. (2007). The European onion? How differentiated integration is reshaping the EU. Journal of European Integration, 29, 503–521.
27.
DijkstraH. (2010). Explaining variation in the role of the EU Council Secretariat in first and second pillar policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 17, 527–544.
28.
DiMaggioP.PowellW. W. (1991). Introduction. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. (Eds.), The New institutionalism in organizational studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
EgeJ.BauerM. W. (2013). International bureaucracies from a public administration and international relations perspective. In ReinaldaB. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of international organization. New York: Routledge.
30.
EgebergM. (1996). Organization and nationality in the European Commission. Public Administration, 74, 721–735.
31.
EgebergM. (1999). The impact of bureaucratic structure on policy making. Public Administration, 77, 155–170.
32.
EgebergM. (2001). How federal? The organizational dimension of integration in the EU (and elsewhere). Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 728–746.
33.
EgebergM. (2003). How bureaucratic structure matters: An organizational perspective. In PetersB. G.PierreJ. (Eds.), Handbook of public administration. London: SAGE Publications.
34.
EgebergM. (2012). How bureaucratic structure matters: An organizational perspective. In PetersB. G.PierreJ. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of public administration (2nd edition). London: SAGE Publications.
35.
EgebergM.GornitzkaÅ.TrondalJ. (2014). A not so technocratic executive? Everyday interaction between the European Parliament and the Commission. West European Politics, 37, 1–18.
36.
EgebergM.GornitzkaÅ.TrondalJ.JohannessenM. (2013). Parliament staff: Unpacking the behaviour of officials in the European Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 495–514.
37.
EriksenE. O. (2009). The unfinished democratization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
EriksenE. O.FossumJ. E. (2012). Rethinking democracy and the European Union. Abingdon: Routledge.
39.
FeatherstoneK.RadaelliC. (2003). The politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
FligsteinN. (2001). Organizations: Theoretical debates and the scope of organizational theory. In CalhounC.RojekC.TurnerB. (Eds.), Handbook of sociology. London: SAGE Publications.
41.
FollesdalA.HixS. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 533–562.
42.
GarudR.HardyC.MaguireS. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28, 957–969.
43.
GeuijenK.t’ HartP.PrincenS.YesilkagitK. (2008). The new Eurocrats: National civil servants in EU policy-making. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
44.
GleibsI. H.MummendeyA.NoackP. (2008). Predictors of change in postmerger identification during a merger process: a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1095–1112.
45.
GravierM. (2008). The 2004 enlargement staff policy of the European Commission: The case for representative bureaucracy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46, 1025–1047.
46.
GravierM. (2013). Challenging the enhancing of the EU’s legitimacy? The evolution of representative bureaucracy in the Commission’s staff policies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 817–838.
47.
GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (2008). Introduction. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications.
48.
GulickL. (1937). Notes on the theory of organizations. In GulickL.UrwickL. F. (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.
49.
HartlappM.LeiberS. (2010). The implementation of EU social policy: The ‘Southern Problem’ revisited. Journal of European Public Policy, 17, 468–486.
50.
Hayes-RenshawF.WallaceH. (2006). The Council of Ministers. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
51.
HeffernanR. (2003). Prime ministerial predominance? Core executive politics in the UK. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 5, 347–372.
52.
HixS. (1998). The study of the European Union II: The ‘New Governance’ agenda and its rival. Journal of European Public Policy, 5, 38–65.
53.
HolzingerK.KnillC. (2002). Path dependencies in European integration: A constructive response to German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer. Public Administration, 80, 125–152.
54.
HolzingerK.SchimmelfennigF. (2012). Differentiated Integration in the European Union: Many concepts, sparse theory, few data. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 292–305.
55.
HoogheL. (2005). Several roads lead to international norms, but few via international socialization: A case study of the European Commission. International Organization, 59, 861–898.
56.
IbsenC. L.LarsenT. P.MadsenJ. S.DueJ. (2011). Challenging Scandinavian employment relations: The effects of new public management reforms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 2295–2310.
57.
JohanssonK. M.TallbergJ. (2010). Explaining chief executive empowerment: EU summitry and domestic institutional change. West European Politics, 33, 208–236.
58.
JohnstonA. I. (2001). Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly, 45, 487–515.
59.
JohnstonA. I. (2005). Conclusions and extensions: Towards mid-range theorizing and beyond Europe. International Organization, 59, 1013–1044.
60.
JupilleJ.CaporasoJ. A. (1999). Institutionalism and the European Union: Beyond international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 429–444.
61.
JupilleJ.CaporasoJ. A.CheckelJ. T. (2003). Integrating institutions: Rationalism, constructivism, and the study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 36, 7–40.
62.
KassimH. (2008). ‘Mission impossible’, but mission accomplished: The Kinnock reforms and the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 15, 648–668.
63.
KassimH. (2010). A silent transformation: Leadership and coordination in the European Commission. University of East Anglia, mimeo.
64.
KassimH.PetersonJ.BauerM.ConnollyS.DehousseR.HoogheL.ThompsonA. (2013). The European Commission of the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
KerwerD. (2013). International organizations as meta-organizations: The case of the European Union. Journal of International Organizations Studies, 4(special issue), 40–53.
66.
KnillC.TosunJ.BauerM. W. (2009). Neglected faces of Europeanization: The differential impact of the EU on the dismantling and expansion of domestic policies. Public Administration, 87, 519–537.
67.
Kohler-KochB. (1996). Catching up with change: The transformation of governance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 3, 359–380.
68.
Kohler-KochB. (2010). Civil society and EU democracy: ‘Astroturf’ representation?Journal of European Public Policy, 17, 100–116.
69.
Kohler-KochB.RittbergerB.(2006). Review article: The ‘Governance Turn’ in EU studies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 27–49.
70.
KollerB. (2012). The takeoff after Lisbon: The practical and theoretical implications of differentiated integration in the EU. World Political Science Review, 8(1), article 2.
71.
KorunkaC.ScharitzerD.CarayonP.SainfortF. (2003). Employee strain and job satisfaction related to an implementation of quality in a public service organization: A longitudinal study. Work and Stress, 17, 52–72.
72.
KreppelA. (2012). The normalization of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 635–645.
73.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.) (2011). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
LinL. H. (2012). Organizational structure and acculturation in acquisitions: Perspectives of congruence theory and task interdependence. Journal of Management, 40, 1831–1856.
75.
MaguireS.HardyC. (2006). The emergence of new global institutions: A discursive perspective. Organization Studies, 27, 7–29.
76.
MaletsO. (2010). Book Review: Meta-Organizations. Organization Studies31(12): 1740–1744.
77.
MarchJ. G. (1962). Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, & Company.
78.
MarchJ. G. (2007). The Study of Organizations and Organizing Since 1945. Organization Studies28(1): 9–19.
79.
MarchJ. G.SimonH. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
80.
MartinL. L.SimmonsB. (1998). Theories and empirical studies on international institutions. International Organization, 52, 729–757.
81.
MayntzR. (2009). Prolog. In DingwerthK.KerwerD.NölkeA. (Eds.), Die Organiserte Welt: International Beziehungen und Organisationsforschung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
82.
McAuleyJ.JohnsonP.DuberleyJ. (2007). Organization theory: Challenges and perspectives. London: Prentice Hall.
83.
MizruchiM. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–298.
84.
MoeT.WilsonS. A. (1994). Presidents and the politics of structure. Law and Contemporary Problems, 57, 1–44.
85.
MurdochZ. (2012). Negotiating the European External Action Service (EEAS): Analysing the external effects of internal (dis)agreement. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, 1011–1027.
86.
MurdochZ.GeysB. (2012). Instrumental calculation, cognitive role-playing, or both? Self-perceptions of seconded national experts in the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 1357–1376.
87.
MurdochZ.GeysB. (2014). Institutional dynamics in international organizations: Lessons from the recruitment procedures of the European External Action Service. Organization Studies, 35, 1793–1811.
88.
MurdochZ.TrondalJ. (2013). Contracted government: Unveiling the European Commission’s contracted staff. West European Politics, 36, 1–21.
89.
MurdochZ.TrondalJ.GeysB. (2015). Representative bureaucracy and seconded national government officials in the European Commission. Regulation and Governance, forthcoming.
90.
NahavandiA.MalekzadehA. R. (1988). Acculturation in mergers and acquisitions. Academy of Management Review, 13, 79–90.
91.
NugentN. (1992). The deepening and widening of the European Community: Recent evolution, Maastricht, and beyond. Journal of Common Market Studies, 30, 311–328.
92.
NugentN. (2010). The government and politics of the European Union (7th edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
93.
OlsenJ. P. (2002). The many faces of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 921–952.
94.
OlsenJ. P. (2003). Towards a European administrative space?Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 506–531.
95.
OlsenJ. P. (2006). Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 1–24.
96.
OlsenJ. P. (2010). Governing through institution building: Institutional theory and recent European experiments in democratic organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
97.
O’ReillyD.ReedM. (2011). The grit in the oyster: Professionalism, managerialism and leaderism as discourses of UK public services modernization. Organization Studies, 32, 1079–1101.
98.
PatersonW.NugentN.EganM. (2010). Hastening slowly: European Union studies, between reinvention and continuing fragmentation. In EganM.NugentN.PatersonW. (Eds.), Research agendas in EU studies: Stalking the elephant. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
99.
PetersB. G. (2011). Institutional theory. In BevirM. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of governance. London: SAGE Publications.
100.
PollackM. A. (2001). International relations theory and European integration, Journal of Common Market Studies, 39, 221–244.
101.
PowellW. W.ColyvasJ. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.SahlinK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organisational institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications.
102.
RaffertyA. E.JimmiesonN. L. (2011). Team change climate: A group-level analysis of the relationships among change information and change participation, role stressors, and wellbeing. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 551–586.
103.
SauruggerS. (2013). Constructivism and public policy approaches in the EU: From ideas to power games. Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 888–906.
104.
SchattschneiderE. E. (1975). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York; London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
105.
SchimmelfennigF. (2010). Integration theory. In: EganM.NugentN.PatersonW. E. (Eds.), Research agendas in EU studies: Stalking the elephant (pp. 37–59). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
SchmidtV. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourses. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.
108.
SchmidtV. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61, 2–22.
109.
SchützeR. (2014). Foreign affairs and the EU Constitution: Selected essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
110.
ScottW. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd edition). London: SAGE Publications.
111.
SelznickP. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
112.
SelznickP. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.
113.
ShawJ. (1996). European Union legal studies in crisis? Towards a new dynamic. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 16, 231–153.
114.
SimonH. (1945). Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan.
115.
StevensA. (2009). Representative bureaucracy: What, why and how? Evidence from the European Commission. Public Policy and Administration, 24, 119–139.
116.
SuddabyR. (2010). Challenges of institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 14–20.
117.
SuvarierolS. (2011). Everyday cosmopolitanism in the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 18, 181–200.
118.
SuvarierolS.BusuoicM.GroenleerM. (2013). Working for Europe: Socialization in the European Commission and agencies of the European Union. Public Administration, 18, 181–200.
119.
SverdrupU. (2010). On the Book ‘Governing through institution building’ by Johan P. Olsen. University of Bergen. Mimeo.
120.
TrondalJ. (2007). The public administration turn in integration research. Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 960–972.
121.
TrondalJ. (2014). The European administrative system reassessed. In BauerM.TrondalJ.(Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the European administrative system. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
122.
TrondalJ.PetersB. G. (2013). The rise of European administrative space: Lessons learned. Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 295–307.
123.
TrondalJ.MurdochZ.GeysB. (2015). On Trojan horses and revolving doors: Autonomy of seconded national officials in the European Commission. European Journal of Political Research, 54(2), 249–270.
124.
Von BogdandyA. (2000) The European Union as a human rights organization? Human rights and the core of the European Union. Common Market Law Review, 37, 1307–1338.
125.
WashingtonM.BoalK. B.DavisJ. N. (2008). Institutional leadership: Past, present and future. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications.
126.
WeberM. (1922/1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
127.
WilleA. (2013). The normalization of the European Commission: Politics and bureaucracy in the EU Executive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
