AshcraftK. L.KuhnT. R.CoorenF. (2009). Constitutional amendments: ‘Materializing’ organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1–64.
2.
BarleyS. R. (1996). Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 404–441.
3.
BencherkiN.CoorenF. (2011). Having to be: The possessive constitution of organization. Human Relations, 64(12), 1579–1607.
4.
CoorenF.KuhnT. R.CornelissenJ. P.ClarkT. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1–22.
5.
GreimasA. J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
PeirceC. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce (Ed. BuchlerJ.). New York, NY: Dover.
7.
PutnamL. L.NicoteraA. M. (Eds.). (2009). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
SimmelG. (1950). Individual and society. In: WolffK. H. (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York, NY: Free Press.
9.
TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (2011). The situated organization: Case studies in the pragmatics of communication research. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
WeberM. (1922). Die drei reinen Typen der legitimen Herrschaft. Preußische Jahrbücher, 187, 1–12.
11.
WeickK. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd edn). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.