Erratum

Abstract

Article: Blind Dates and Arranged Marriages: Longitudinal Processes of Network Orchestration

Authors: Raymond L Paquin and Jennifer Howard-Grenville

Published in Organization Studies 2013, Volume 34 Issue 11, pages 1623–1653, first published on May 1, 2013 doi:10.1177/0170840612470230.

Table 4 in this article was not published correctly. The corrected table can be found below.

Table 4.

Top 20 Most Active Firms in West Midlands IS Network and Prior Year Rankings.

Rank	2005	2006 (2005 Rank)	2007 (2005, 2006 Rank)	2008 (2005, 2006, 2007 Rank)	2009 (2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Rank)
1	A	NISP (76)	NISP (76,1)	NISP (76,1,1)	NISP (76,1,1,1)
2	B	HG (na)	DH (na,3)	AJ (36,75,5)	AJ (36,75,5,2)
3	C	DH (na)	HG (na,2)	CD (82,4,4)	CD (82,4,4,3)
4	D	CD (82)	CD (82,4)	DH (na,3,2)	DH (na,3,2,4)
5	E	DP (na)	AJ (36,75)	AT (46,74,6)	AR (44,56,19,10)
6	F	CA (79)	AT (46,74)	EE (na,na,40)	HG (na,2,3,7)
7	G	CG (85)	DJ (na,29)	HG (na,2,3)	AT (46,74,6,5)
8	H	CH (86)	CA (79,6)	DZ (na,95,29)	EE (na,na,40,6)
9	I	CE (83)	GY (na,130)	DJ (na,29,7)	GU (na,na,na,26)
10	J	CU (99)	CG (85,7)	AR (44,56,19)	DZ (na,95,29,8)
11	K	DV (na)	CH (86,8)	DI (na,121,31)	GV (na,na,na,61)
12	L	DU (na)	DL (na,na)	EL (na,na,56)	DJ (na,29,7,9)
13	M	DW (na)	DM (na,na)	IL (na,na,na)	EL (na,na,56,12)
14	N	DX (na)	DN (na,na)	CA (79,6,8)	DI (na,121,31,11)
15	O	DY (na)	DO (na,na)	GO (na,na,195)	CB (80,19,43,29)
16	P	DQ (na)	CE (83,9)	DK (na,na,na)	CE (83,9,16,28)
17	Q	ED (na)	DP (na,5)	GY (na,130,9)	CA (79,6,8,14)
18	R	BH (60)	DQ (na,16)	CG (85,7,10)	GW (na,na,na,25)
19	S	CB (80)	AR (44,56)	CH (86,8,11)	GO (na,na,195,15)
20	T	CM (91)	DR (na,na)	DL (na,na,12)	DK (na,na,na,16)

Notes:

a) Except for NISP, all firms have been coded to obscure their identity.

b) Prior year rankings marked with ‘na’ means the firm was not in the network.

c) The dotted lines visually trace individual firms as they shift position within the top 20 firms from year to year.