This paper addresses processes of subjection and abjection as expressed in organizational and collective memory. It complements recent developments in organizational memory studies by demonstrating how the dark side of organization has been subjected to what Susan Sontag calls a ‘collective instruction’ process that normalizes how this dark side is understood, or marginalized. The paper argues that history today is often represented as kitsch and offers a method of aesthetic ‘juxtaposition’ of visual artefacts that together with a detailed reading enables researchers to critically challenge this organization of memory and reintegrate abjected material. The method is exemplified by juxtaposing the iconic World War II photo of a little Jewish boy leaving his home with his hands in the air during the Nazi clearances of the Warsaw Ghetto and Paul Klee’s iconic painting of an angel in terror, Angelus Novus, painted in 1920 just after World War I. The analysis demonstrates how history tends to be organized by a majoritarian system – in this case what has been termed ‘the Holocaust industry’ – through collective instruction in how to interpret events, and outlines alternative ways for exposing and resisting this process, resulting in the creation of counter-narratives. This analytical strategy confirms that organizational aesthetics resides at the heart of what is political.
AdornoT. W. (1981). Prisms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AgambenG. (1999). Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
AgambenG. (2000).
4.
AgambenG. (2002). Remnants of Auschwitz: The witness and the archive. New York: Zone Books.
5.
AgambenG. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
ArmbrüsterT. (2002). Anti-modernism and managerial pseudo-liberalism. (Extended review of Paul du Gay: In Praise of Bureaucracy). ephemera: critical dialogues on organization, 2(1), 88–93.
7.
BanerjeeS. B. (2008) Necrocapitalism. Organization Studies, 29, 1541–1563.
8.
BanerjeeS. B.LinsteadS. (2004). Masking subversion: Neocolonial embeddedness in anthropological accounts of indigenous management. Human Relations, 57, 221–247.
9.
BarthesR. (1975). The pleasure of the text. New York: Hill & Wang.
10.
BarthesR. (1977). Image/Music/Text. New York: Hill & Wang.
11.
BarthesR. (1981). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. New York: Hill & Wang.
12.
BaumanZ. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BiroM. (2003). Representation and event: Anselm Kiefer, Joseph Beuys, and the memory of the Holocaust. Yale Journal of Criticism, 16(1), 113–146.
15.
BoothC.ClarkP.DelahayeA.ProcterS.RowlinsonM. (2007). Accounting for the dark side of corporate history: Organizational culture perspectives and the Bertelsmann case. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18, 625–644.
16.
BorgersonJ. L. (2010). Witnessing and organization: Existential phenomenological reflections on intersubjectivity. Philosophy Today, 54, 78–87.
17.
BroughtonP. R. (1981). The Cubist novel: Towards defining the genre. In FowlerDoreenAbadieAnn J. (Eds.), “A Cosmos of My Own”: Faulkner and Yoknapatawpha, 1980. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
18.
BurrellG. (1997). Pandemonium: Towards a retro-organization theory. London: SAGE Publications.
19.
CadavaE.Cortés-RoccaP. (2009). Notes on Love and Photography. In BatchenGeoffrey (Ed.), Photography Degree Zero. (pp. 105–139). London, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20.
CalinescuM. (1987). Five faces of modernity: Modernism, avant-garde, decadence, kitsch, postmodernism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
ChouliarakiL. (2006). The spectatorship of suffering. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
22.
CleggS. (2009). Bureaucracy, the Holocaust and techniques of power at work. Management Revue, 20, 326–347.
23.
CleggS. R.CourpassonD.PhillipsN. (2006). Power and organizations. London: SAGE Publications.
24.
ColwellC. (1997). Deleuze and Foucault: Series, event, genealogy. Theory and Event, 1(2).
25.
ConnertonP. (1989). How societies remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
CraneS. (2008). Choosing not to look: Representation, repatriation, and Holocaust atrocity. Photography, History and Theory, 47, 309–330.
27.
DantoA. C. (2003). The abuse of beauty: Aesthetics and the concept of art. Chicago: Open Court.
28.
DeleuzeG. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1986). Kafka: Toward a minor literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
31.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1988). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy?New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
DembowskiP. F. (2005). Christians in the Warsaw ghetto: An epitaph for the unremembered. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
34.
FinkelsteinN. G. (2000). The Holocaust industry: Reflections on the exploitation of Jewish suffering. London: Verso.
35.
FlemingP.SpicerA. (2007). Contesting the corporation: Struggle, power and resistance in organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
FlemingP.SturdyA. (2009). “Just be yourself!”Employee Relations, 31, 569–583.
37.
FoucaultM. (1996). Film and popular memory. In LotringerSylvere (Ed.), Foucault live: Collected interviews 1961–198. (pp. 122–132). New York: Semiotext(e).
38.
GagliardiP. (1996). Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 565–580). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
39.
GodfreyR.LilleyS. (2009). Visual consumption, collective memory and the representation of war. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 12, 275–300.
40.
GoldhagenD. (1997). The new discourse of avoidance. Frankfurter Rundschau, 18August1997.
41.
GreyC. (2009). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying organizations, 2nd edition.London: SAGE Publications.
42.
GreyC.WillmottH. (2005). Critical management studies: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
HackbarthG.GroverV. (1999). The knowledge repository: Organisation memory information systems. Information Systems Management, 16(3), 21–30.
44.
HalbwachsM. (1992). On collective memory. Trans. CoserL. A.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
HancockP. (2005). Uncovering the semiotic in organizational aesthetics. Organization, 12, 29–50.
46.
HarimanR.LucaitesJ. L. (2002). Performing civic identity: The iconic photograph of the flag raising on Iwo Jima. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 88, 363–392.
47.
HaverkampA. (1993). The memory of pictures: Roland Barthes and Augustine on photography. Comparative Literature, 45, 258–279.
48.
JenkinsE. S. (2008). My iPod, my iCon: How and why images become icons. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 25, 466–489.
49.
KeilbachJ. (2009). Photographs, symbolic images and the Holocaust: On the (im)possibility of depicting historical truth. History and Theory, 47, 54–76.
50.
KingI. (2003). Reassessing organizational structure as a painting of space. Culture & Organization, 9, 195–207.
51.
KleinN. (2000). No logo. London: Flamingo.
52.
KosteraM. (1997). The Kitsch-Organization. Studies in Cultures, Organizations & Societies, 3, 163–177.
53.
KristevaJ. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. [Pouvoirs de l’horreur.] New York: Columbia University Press.
54.
KunderaM. (1984). The unbearable lightness of being. London: Faber & Faber.
55.
KyriakopoulosK.de RuyterK. (2004). Knowledge stocks and information flows in new product development. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 1469–1498.
56.
LeviP. (1989). The drowned and the saved. New York: Vintage International.
57.
LinfieldS. (2010). The cruel radiance: Photography and political violence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
LinsteadS. A. (2002). Organizational kitsch. Organization, 9, 657–684.
59.
LongB. S.MillsA. J. (2008). Globalization, postcolonial theory, and organizational analysis: Lessons from the Rwanda genocide. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4, 389–409.
60.
LongB. S.GrantJ.MillsA. J.Rudderham-GaudetE.WarrenA. (2009). Genocide in Rwanda: Leadership, ethics, and organisational ‘failure’ in a post-colonial context. In RauffletE.MillsA. J. (Eds.), The dark side: Critical cases on the downside of businessSheffield: Greenleaf.
61.
LyotardJ.-F. (1993). The other’s rights. In ShuteS.HurleyS. (Eds.), On human rights (pp. 135–149). New York: Basic Books.
62.
MarcusG. E.FischerM. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
MartíI.FernándezP. (2013). The institutional work of oppression and resistance: Learning from the Holocaust. Organization Studies, 34, 1195–1223.
64.
MarxK. (1992/1885). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Surveys From Exile: Political Writings, 2, 143–249. London: Penguin.
65.
MatilalS.HöpflH. (2009). Accounting for the Bhopal disaster: Footnotes and photographs. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22, 953–972.
MontgomeryS. (1991). Science as kitsch: The dinosaur and other icons. Science as Culture, 2(1), 7–58.
68.
MunroI. (2005). The mythic foundations of organization. In LinsteadS.LinsteadA. (Eds.), Thinking organization (pp.74–93). London: Routledge.
69.
NancyJ. (2005). The ground of the image. New York: Fordham University Press.
70.
NeocleousM. (2005). Long live death! Fascism, resurrection, immortality. Journal of Political Ideologies, 10, 31–49.
71.
NissleyN.CaseyA. (2002). The politics of the exhibition: Viewing corporate memory through the paradigmatic lens of organizational memory. British Journal of Management, 13, 35–45.
72.
OlickJ. K. (2008). ‘Collective memory’: A memoir and prospect. Memory Studies1, 23–29.
73.
OlickJ. K.RobbinsJ. (1998). Social memory studies: From ‘collective memory’ to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105–40.
74.
OxmanE. (2010). Sensing the image: Roland Barthes and the affect of the visual. SubStance, 39(122), 71–90.
75.
ParkerM. (2010). Pirates and the uses of history (book review). ephemera: theory and politics in organization, 10, 194–198.
76.
ParrA. (2006). Deterritorialising the Holocaust. In BuchananI.ParrA. (Eds.), Deleuze and the contemporary world (pp. 125–145). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
77.
PoratD. (2010). The boy: A Holocaust story. New York: Hill & Wang.
78.
RancièreJ. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible. London: Continuum.
79.
RaskinR. (2004). A child at gunpoint: A case study in the life of a photo. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
80.
RidgenD.RossierN. (Producers and directors) (2009). American radical. The trials of Norman Finkelstein. SD Video, documentary. Clip discussed in text viewable at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0z07NimNrEs (accessed 17 September 2012).
81.
RowlinsonM.CarterC. (2002). Foucault and history in organization studies. Organization, 9, 527–547.
82.
RowlinsonM.BoothC.ClarkP.DelahayeA.ProcterS. (2010). Social remembering and organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31, 69–87.
83.
SchroederJ. E.BorgersonJ. L. (2002). Innovations in information technology: Insights from Italian Renaissance art. Consumption Markets & Culture, 5, 153.
84.
SmithOwen (1998). Fluxus: The history of an attitude. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Press.
85.
SolomonR. (1991). On kitsch and sentimentality. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 49, 1–14.
86.
SontagS. (1979). On photography. London: Penguin.
87.
SontagS. (1980). Fascinating Fascism: Under the sign of Saturn. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
88.
SontagS. (2003). Regarding the pain of others. New York: Penguin.
89.
SørensenB. M. (2010). St Paul’s conversion: The aesthetic organization of labour. Organization Studies, 31, 307–326.
90.
SørensenB. M. (2013). The method of juxtaposition: Unfolding the visual turn in organization studies. In BellEmmaWarrenSamanthaSchroederJonathan (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Visual Organization. London: Routledge.
91.
SpoelstraS. (2007). What is organization?Lund: Lund Business Press.
92.
StewartK. (1996). A place at the side of the road: Cultural poetics in an “other” America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Paperbacks.
93.
StokesP.GabrielY. (2010). Engaging with genocide: The challenge for organization and management studies. Organization, 17, 461–480.
94.
StratiA. (2000). The aesthetic approach in organization studies. In LinsteadStephenHöpflHeather (Eds.), The aesthetics of organizing. London: SAGE Publications.
95.
StroopJürgen (1943). The Jewish Quarter of Warsaw is no more!, also known as The Stroop Report. Koblenz: German Bundesarchiv.
96.
TaylorC. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
97.
ten BosR. (1998). Essai: Business ethics and Bauman ethics. Organization Studies, 18, 997–1014.
98.
WalshJ. P.UngsonG. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16, 57–91.
99.
WarrenS. (2008). Empirical challenges in organizational aesthetics research: Towards a sensual methodology. Organization Studies, 29, 559–580.
100.
WerckmeisterO. K. (1999). Icons of the left: Benjamin and Eisenstein, Picasso and Kafka after the fall of communism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
101.
ZerubavelE. (1996). Social memories: Steps to a sociology of the past. Qualitative Sociology, 19, 283–299.
