This paper extends existing understandings of power, resistance and subjectivity in professional service organizations by developing an analysis of how these relate to temporality. Drawing in particular on Hoy’s reading of the Foucauldian account of temporality, we conceive of disciplinary power regimes and resistance as inherently future-oriented, or, to use Ybema’s term, postalgic. In moving beyond the extant research focus on self-disciplined and/or counter-resistant professional selves, we draw attention to the imaginary future self as an employee response to disciplinary power. In contrast to the future orientation of disciplinary power, this response envisages the future as a discontinuous break with the present which we examine as a form of resistant postalgia. Building on in-depth qualitative data gathered at two professional service firms, we explain how imaginary future selves can shed new light on the interplay of power, resistance and subjectivity.
AdamB. (2010). Future matters: Challenge for social theory and social inquiry. Cultura e comunicazione, 1, 47–55.
2.
AlvessonM. (1993). Organizations as rhetoric: Knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 997–1015.
3.
AlvessonM. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
AlvessonM.KärremanD. (2007). Unraveling HRM: Identity, ceremony, and control in a management consultancy firm. Organization Science, 18, 711–723.
5.
AlvessonM.WillmottH. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 619–644.
6.
Anderson-GoughF.GreyC.RobsonK. (2000). In the name of the client: The service ethic in two professional services firms. Human Relations, 53, 1151–1174.
7.
Anderson-GoughF.GreyC.RobsonK. (2001). Test of time: Organizational time-reckoning and the making of accountants in two multi-national accounting firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 99–102.
8.
Anderson-GoughF.GreyC.RobsonK. (2005). “Helping Them to Forget…”: The organizational embedding of gender relations in public audit firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 469–490.
9.
BergströmO.HasselbladhH.KärremanD. (2009). Organizing disciplinary power in a knowledge organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 178–190.
10.
BergströmO.KnightsD. (2006) Organizational discourse and subjectivity: Subjectification during processes of recruitment. Human Relations, 59, 351–377.
11.
BeyerJ. M.HannahD. R. (2002). Building on the past: Enacting established personal identities in a new work setting. Organization Science, 13, 636–652.
12.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinctions: A social critique of the judgement of taste (NiceR., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
BrownA. D. (2006). A narrative approach to collective identities. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 731–753.
14.
BrownA. D.HumphreysM. (2006). Organizational identity and place: A discursive exploration of hegemony and resistance. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 231–257.
15.
BrownA. D.LewisM. A. (2011). Identities, discipline and routines. Organization Studies, 32, 871–895.
16.
BojeD. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London, UK: Sage.
17.
CarlsenA. (2006). Organizational becoming as dialogical imagination of practice: The case of the indomitable Gauls. Organization Science, 17, 132–149.
18.
CarrA. N.HancockP. (2006). Space and time in organizational change management. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 545–557.
19.
CaseyC. (1995). Work, self and society. London, UK: Routledge.
20.
ClarkT. (1995). Managing consultants: Consultancy as the management of impression. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
21.
CleggS. (1990). Modern organizations: Organization studies in the postmodern world. London, UK: Sage.
22.
CostasJ. (2012). “We are all friends here”: Reinforcing paradoxes of normative control in a culture of friendship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21, 377–395.
23.
CostasJ.FlemingP. (2009). Beyond dis-identification: Towards a discursive approach to self-alienation in contemporary organizations. Human Relations, 62, 353–378.
24.
CollinsonD. L. (1992). Managing the shopfloor: Subjectivity, masculinity and workplace culture. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
25.
CollinsonD. L. (2003). Identities and insecurities: Selves at work. Organization, 10, 527–547.
26.
CovaleskiM. A.DirsmithM. W.HeianJ. B.SamuelS. (1998). The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 293–327.
27.
CrapanzanoV. (2003). Reflections on hope as a category of social and psychological analysis. Cultural Anthropology, 18, 3–32.
28.
CritesS. (1971). The narrative quality of experience. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 39, 291–311.
CzarniawskaB. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Czarniawska-JoergesB. (1990). Merchants of meaning: Management consulting in Swedish public sector. In TurnerB. A. (Ed.), Organizational symbolism (pp. 130–150). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
32.
DeetzS. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
33.
Du GayP. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London, UK: Sage.
34.
EzzamelM.WillmottH.WorthingtonF. (2001). Power, control and resistance in the factory that time forgot. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 1053–1079.
35.
FlemingP.SewellG. (2002). Looking for the good soldier, Švejk: Alternative modalities of resistance in contemporary workplace. Sociology, 36, 857–873.
36.
FlemingP.SpicerA. (2003). Working at a cynical distance: Implications for power, subjectivity and resistance. Organization, 10, 157–179.
37.
FoucaultM. (1998). The will to knowledge: History of sexuality (Vol. 1; HurleyR., Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1976)
38.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (Trans. SheridanA.). London, UK: Penguin Books.
39.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. In DreyfusL.RabinowP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Brighton, UK: Harvester.
40.
FoucaultM. (2008). Psychiatric power: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973–1974 (BurchellG., Trans.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
FournierV. (1999). The appeal to “professionalism” as a disciplinary mechanism. The Sociological Review, 47, 280–307.
42.
FurustenS. (1999). Popular management books: How they are made and what they mean for organizations. London, UK: Routledge.
43.
GabrielY. (1993). Organizational nostalgia: Reflections on the “golden age”. In FinemanS. (Ed.), Emotion in organization (pp. 118–142). London, UK: Sage.
44.
GabrielY. (1995). The unmanaged organization: Stories, fantasies and subjectivities. Organization Studies, 16, 477–501.
45.
GaneshS.ZollerH.CheneyG. (2006). Transforming resistance, broadening our boundaries: Critical organizational communication meets globalization from below. Communication Monographs, 72, 169–191.
46.
GreyC. (1994). Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline. Sociology, 28, 479–497.
47.
GreyC. (1998). On being a professional in a “Big Six” firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23, 569–587.
48.
GrintK. (1994). Reengineering history: Social resonances and business process reengineering. Organization, 1, 179–201.
49.
HalfordS.LeonardP. (2005). Place, space and time: Contextualizing workplace subjectivities. Organization Studies, 27, 657–676.
50.
HeideggerM. (1996). Being and time (StambaughJ., Trans.). Albany: State University of New York Press. (Original work published 1927)
51.
HochschildA. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York, NY: Metropolitan.
52.
Holmer-NadesanN. (1996). Organizational identity and space of action. Organization Studies, 17, 49–81.
53.
HoyD. (Ed.). (1986). Foucault: A critical reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
54.
HoyD. (1988). Foucault: Modern or postmodern? In AracJ. (Ed.), After Foucault: Humanistic knowledge, postmodern challenges (pp. 12–41). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
55.
HoyD. (2004). Critical resistance: From poststructuralism to post-critique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56.
HoyD. (2009a). The time of our lives: A critical history of temporality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57.
HoyD. (2009b). The temporality of power. In PradoC. G. (Ed.), Foucault’s legacy (pp. 6–18). London, UK: Continuum.
58.
IbarraH. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764–791.
59.
JermierJ.KnightsD.NordW. Eds.). (1993). Resistance and power in organizations. London, UK: Routledge.
60.
KamocheK.PangM.WongA. (2011). Career development and knowledge appropriation: A genealogical critique. Organization Studies, 32, 1665–1679.
61.
KärremanD.AlvessonM. (2004). Cages in tandem, management control social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization, 11, 149–175.
62.
KärremanD.AlvessonM. (2009). Resisting resistance: Counter-resistance, consent and compliance in a consultancy firm. Human Relations, 62, 1115–1144.
63.
KennyK.WhittleA.WillmottH. (2011). Understanding identity and organizations. London, UK: Sage.
64.
KippingM.EngwallL. (2002). Introduction: Management consulting as a knowledge industry. In KippingM.EngwallL. (Eds.), Management consulting: Emergence and dynamics of a knowledge industry (pp. 1–18). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
65.
KitayJ.WrightC. (2007). From prophets to profits: The occupational rhetoric of management consultants. Human Relations, 60, 1613–1640.
66.
KnightsD.McCabeD. (2000). “Ain’t misbehavin”? Opportunities for resistance under new forms of “quality” management. Sociology, 43, 421–436.
67.
KnightsD.VurdubakisT. (1994). Foucault, power, resistance and all that. In JermierJ. M.KnightsD.NordW. R. (Eds.), Resistance and power in organizations (pp. 167–198). London, UK: Routledge.
68.
KnightsD.WillmottH. (1989). Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology, 23, 535–558.
69.
KondoD. K. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
70.
KosmalaK.HerrbachO. (2006). The ambivalence of professional identity: On cynicism and jouissance in audit firms. Human Relations, 59, 1393–1428.
71.
KuhnT. A. (2006). “Demented work ethic” and a “lifestyle firm”: Discourse, identity, and workplace time commitments. Organization Studies, 27, 1339–1358.
72.
KundaG. (1992). Engineering culture. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
73.
Leclercq-VandelannoitteA. (2011). Organizations and discursive constructions: A Foucauldian approach. Organization Studies, 32, 1247–1271.
74.
McCabeD. (2004). “A land of milk and honey”? Reengineering the “past” and “present” in a call centre. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 827–856.
75.
MuellerF.CarterC.Ross-SmithA. (2011). Making sense of career in a Big Four accounting firm. Current Sociology, 59, 551–567.
76.
MumbyD. K. (1987). The political function of narrative in organizations. Communication Monographs, 54, 113–127.
77.
MumbyD. K. (2005). Theorizing resistance in organization studies: A dialectical approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 19–44.
78.
McAdamsD. P. (1993). The stories we live by. New York, NY: William Morrow.
79.
NewtonT. (1998). Theorizing subjectivity in organizations: The failure of Foucauldian studies?Organization Studies, 19, 415–447.
80.
O’ConnorE. S. (2000). Plotting the organization: The embedded narrative as a construct for studying change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 174–192.
81.
ParkerM. (2000). Organizational culture and identity. London, UK: Sage.
82.
PitsisT. S.CleggS. R.MarosszekyM.Rura-PolleyT. (2003). Constructing the Olympic dream: A future perfect strategy of project management. Organization Science, 14, 574–590.
83.
PrattM. (2000). The good, the bad and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 456–493.
RobertsL. M. (2005). Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 30, 685–711.
86.
RoseN. (1989). Governing the soul. London, UK: Routledge.
87.
SewellG.WilkinsonB. (1992). “Someone to watch over me”: Surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 26, 271–289.
88.
SilvermanD. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
89.
SossJ.FordingR.SchramS. (2011). The organization of discipline: From performance management to perversity and punishment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 203–232.
90.
SpradleyJ. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
91.
StranglemanT. (1999). The nostalgia of organizations and the organization of nostalgia. Sociology, 33, 725–746.
92.
SturdyA. (1997). The consulting process: An insecure business?Journal of Management Studies, 34, 389–413.
93.
SturdyA. (2008). Consultancy and clients. In GabrielY. (Ed.), Organizing words: A critical thesaurus for social and organization studies (pp. 49–51). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
94.
SturdyA.WrightC. (2008). A consulting diaspora? Enterprising selves as agents of enterprise. Organization, 15, 427–444.
95.
SveningssonS.AlvessonM. (2003). Managing managerial identities: Organizational fragmentation, discourse and identity struggle. Human Relations, 56, 1163–1193.
96.
ThomasR.DaviesA. (2005). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26, 683–706.
97.
ThornborrowT.BrownA. D. (2009). “Being regimented”: Aspiration, discipline and identity work in the British parachute regime. Organization Studies, 30, 355–376.
98.
TownleyB. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18, 518–545.
TraceyS. J.TretheweyA. (2005). Fracturing the real-self ↔ fake-self dichotomy: Moving towards “crystallized” organizational discourses and identities. Communication Theory, 15, 168–195.
101.
TretheweyA. (1997). Resistance, identity and empowerment: A postmodern feminist analysis of clients in human service organization. Communication Monographs, 64, 281–301.
